OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Qualibrate comparison

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

1,432 Views
1,074 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and Qualibrate are competing products in the software testing automation category. OpenText seems to have the upper hand in terms of features, while Qualibrate offers better pricing and return on investment.

Features: OpenText provides extensive testing for mobile and web applications with a focus on detailed analytics and integration options. It supports a variety of testing strategies on real devices, emulators, and AWS device farm, allowing for comprehensive automation capabilities. This product is also renowned for its flexibility in on-premises and cloud deployments, alongside strong integration with tools like UFT and LeanFT. Qualibrate shines with its low-code approach tailored to business process automation, making it easy for business users to record and automate test scripts. It supports seamless integration with SAP Solution Manager for test planning and execution, enhancing usability for end-to-end processes. The interface is intuitive, allowing users to easily handle recordings, playbacks, and maintain test scripts efficiently.

Room for Improvement: OpenText can improve by simplifying its complex deployment process to ease setup time and broaden accessibility. Enhancing user documentation and support for non-standard platforms may also be beneficial. Increased focus on reducing the initial cost will make it more attractive. In contrast, Qualibrate could benefit from extending its testing capabilities beyond business processes to provide a broader scope of automation. Improving integration options with non-SAP environments would be advantageous to capture a wider user base. Additionally, expanding analytics capabilities could provide deeper insights into test outcomes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText's deployment process is complex and may require significant setup time, but it is backed by strong customer support that helps address user challenges. Its capability for both on-premises and cloud deployment offers users a flexible approach. In contrast, Qualibrate offers an agile deployment process that is user-friendly. It provides quick updates with responsive service, focusing on simplified integrations that align well with customer-centric needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText's pricing includes higher initial setup costs, which may impact immediate cost-effectiveness despite its feature richness. This could deter budget-conscious users as the ROI might take longer. On the other hand, Qualibrate presents a lower entry cost paired with rapid ROI, establishing itself as a more cost-effective choice for businesses looking to maximize value with limited budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: June 2026).

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Qualibrate

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

32nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (21st), Test Automation Tools (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	1.9%
Qualibrate	1.4%
Other	96.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

it_user1760325

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pricing is great."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"With Qualibrate, when we looked at the time and resources we are saving it was €1.5 million per year, mostly because of the move away from manual testing."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

"If you look at it from an overall perspective, where you look at the time that we typically would spend on testing, then it is probably a bit more like 60 to 70 percent time savings."

"Before Qualibrate, we did a release in about three months, and the regression testing would take us about three weeks with 15 people; now, we do it in one night."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"We do see the long-term value in terms of time savings and the stress it is going to alleviate for the team."

More Qualibrate pros

Cons

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

"Their support has been quite good overall, but there have been some frustrations recently where we just feel like we're not always being heard."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Qualibrate

Compared 10% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Qualibrate

Compared 9% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Qualibrate

Compared 6% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs Qualibrate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualibrate Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download Qualibrate product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Qualibrate is a leading solution for test automation, offering a low-code approach that simplifies automation tasks. Its integration with SAP Solution Manager ensures efficient test management, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking to streamline their testing processes.

Qualibrate provides user-friendly features that make test script recording and automation accessible to business personnel. It facilitates the reduction of transactions into end-to-end processes, allowing for seamless changes. The tool's integration with SAP Solution Manager enhances test planning, execution scheduling, and process flow management. Users utilize Qualibrate mainly for regression and user acceptance testing within SAP applications, automating standard change processes, and transitioning from manual to automated testing. Its capability to integrate with systems like ServiceNow and host operations in the cloud highlights its versatility in managing critical applications.

What are Qualibrate's most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies test script recording with low-code features.
SAP Integration: Streamlines test management with SAP Solution Manager.
Test Planning: Offers scheduling tools for test execution.
End-to-End Processes: Allows conversion of transactions into comprehensive processes.
Dummy Data Reduction: Minimizes unnecessary data in testing environments.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Reduces manhours through automation of regression testing.
SAP Optimization: Enhances testing strategies specifically for SAP applications.
Cloud Hosting: Ensures reliable testing of critical applications in the cloud.
System Integration: Seamlessly operates with platforms like ServiceNow.

In industries heavily reliant on SAP applications, Qualibrate plays a key role in transitioning from manual to automated regression testing, significantly reducing development complexity. Organizations employing this tool can expect streamlined operations, especially in sectors requiring frequent updates and changes to SAP environments.

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Qualibrate