OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

OpenText and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5, while SmartBear is ranked #20. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

2,235 Views
1,721 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

3,075 Views
1,722 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

ReadyAPI Test and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web compete in the domain of software testing solutions. OpenText is noted for its advanced feature set, while ReadyAPI Test offers a competitive edge in pricing and support.

Features: ReadyAPI Test offers seamless integration capabilities, robust testing frameworks, and ease of project and test suite setup. OpenText facilitates advanced mobile testing tools, automation features, and multi-device testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could enhance its mobile testing flexibility and expand automation functionalities. OpenText might benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving deployment flexibility, and refining user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test provides straightforward deployment with strong support channels, making integration within existing systems seamless. OpenText offers similar customer service quality but involves a more complex setup process due to its extensive functionality.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is known for its affordable pricing, making it suitable for smaller budgets while ensuring good ROI. OpenText, although having higher initial setup costs, promises substantial ROI due to its broader testing functionalities for larger operations.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (11th), API Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 2.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
ReadyAPI Test	2.2%
Other	95.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The pricing is great."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration, and it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours."

"SoapUI is very useful; before we started using SoapUI, we had to do everything manually, which is very time-consuming, and there were a few things we couldn't validate, but using SoapUI made everything easier, you can do six to seven hours of work efficiently, and it's more flexible to use."

"I primarily use Soap UI to test XML/JSON requests and responses for APIs hosted by us and our vendors."

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly."

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"With versions prior to 2.0 I found that configuration was trickier than it should be, particularly with aspects such as NV."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"Sometimes it would get stuck, so we had to close ReadyAPI and then start it again."

"Better integration capabiliites with a range of Test Management Systems (not that it is not possible using the API) where a range of aspects are considered such as housing of the project, sharing (some capabilities here), versioning of projects, automatic saving of run information and results (again this can be done in test suite setup but would be great to view in a test management system)."

"I have not been able to use this tool a lot of time, so I don't consider myself in a position to say what can really be improved."

"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."

"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."

"I am not really a fan of the Ready Pro version even though I am sure it offers a lot."

"For automation commands, it should be able to do what SmartBear is doing with ReadyAPI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"It is free of charge."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 10% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

April 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

April 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

ReadyAPI Test is a versatile solution for API testing, known for its flexibility, automation, and ease of setup. It efficiently handles SOAP, REST, and JDBC testing, with a user-friendly interface that supports both technical and non-technical teams.

ReadyAPI Test offers robust capabilities in API testing, including functional, load, and security testing. Features such as Groovy scripting, mock services, and data-driven testing enhance workflow efficiency. It integrates well with project environments, supporting script writing and database validation. Teams benefit from easy navigation and comprehensive testing capabilities, making it suitable for IT clients and software test engineers.

What are the main features of ReadyAPI Test?

Groovy Scripting: Enables advanced testing scenarios and custom functions.
Mock Services: Allows simulation of service responses for more dynamic testing.
Data-Driven Testing: Supports testing with diverse data sets for extensive validation.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances project workflows with seamless environment connections.
Load and Security Testing: Provides efficient performance analysis and security checks.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation for both technical and non-technical users.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Streamlined testing processes reduce time spent on manual tasks.
Flexibility: Adapts to varied testing needs and environments easily.
Comprehensive Testing: Supports a full range of API testing types for different protocols.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces long-term costs through automation and efficient operations.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates better team collaboration with integrated tools.

ReadyAPI Test is deployed across industries for automated and manual API testing. It suits industries like IT services, where it assists software test engineers in end-to-end testing scenarios, including email systems and mainframe integration. Organizations utilize it for extensive testing requirements, offering a range of validation methods across project lifecycles.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

April 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.