OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5, while Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 1.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

2,510 Views
1,933 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

3,291 Views
1,909 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web are competitors in the software testing industry. While Visual Studio Test Professional is advantageous for its integration capabilities and pricing, OpenText Functional Testing Lab holds the advantage with its advanced features and extensive automation capabilities.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers seamless integration with Microsoft products, efficient automated test case management, and robust reporting. OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides comprehensive testing functionalities, extensive platform support, and specialized automation tools for mobile and web applications.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could enhance its mobile testing capabilities, improve user experience in cloud environments, and expand cross-platform testing features. OpenText Functional Testing Lab could offer more straightforward reporting tools, simplified user on-boarding, and refined integration with third-party platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing Lab utilizes a cloud-based deployment model, offering flexible access and scaling options, supported by excellent customer service for smooth implementation. Visual Studio Test Professional requires on-premise setup but benefits from robust customer support within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional has a competitive pricing structure with lower initial costs, presenting a favorable ROI over time. OpenText Functional Testing Lab, although priced higher, offers significant ROI thanks to its extensive testing functionalities, appealing to businesses that require comprehensive testing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 1.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	1.9%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	1.9%
Other	96.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"Using the existing enterprise tools, like UFT, or even if you want to go open source, you can use them and it's a real user-functional performance, we are able to achieve that."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."

"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."

"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."

"Microsoft programs are usually very easy and straightforward to install."

"Its initial setup process is easy."

"The interface is easy to use."

"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."

"It is a good and user-friendly tool."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"I don't think the product as it is right now is going to sell itself, but it's really what are the next steps."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"The product must provide more automation."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"We found the documentation to be limited and we had problems with the vendor who delivered it which added to the complexity."

"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."

"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."

"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."

"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."

"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"It is a price-effective solution"

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."

"The tool is affordable."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"Our company pays a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?

We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

Wikidi Testomato vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 4% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

June 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

May 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Visual Studio Test Professional offers sophisticated testing capabilities with a focus on integration with Azure DevOps. Supporting software development, it aids in application creation, lifecycle management, and testing, accommodating a wide array of programming languages.

Visual Studio Test Professional delivers robust features essential for software developers, including seamless integration with C# and .NET projects and extensive customization options. The platform's robust debugging, unit testing, and memory analysis help streamline the development process. Its intuitive interface and integration with tools like IntelliSense and NuGet package manager enhance productivity, alongside its collaboration capabilities with Azure DevOps. While beneficial, it faces challenges such as integration issues with CI tools, high technical skill requirements, and concerns about pricing and stability. Refinements in user interface design, platform compatibility, and support for AI and machine learning technologies remain necessary.

What are the most important features of Visual Studio Test Professional?

Seamless Integration: Works efficiently with C# and .NET, reducing setup complexities.
Intelligent Tools: Includes IntelliSense for coding, simplifying complex tasks.
Robust Debugging: Offers advanced debugging features for troubleshooting.
Extensive Customization: Adaptable to meet development needs effectively.
Azure DevOps Collaboration: Enhances project collaboration and tracking.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines development workflow, saving time.
Enhanced Collaboration: Team integrations facilitate smoother project execution.
Expanded Capabilities: Supports automation, leading to increased productivity.
Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive resources aid in navigating platform complexities.

Visual Studio Test Professional finds its application in software development and automation testing industries, where technical teams use it to create and manage applications across multiple environments. It supports test-driven development, ensuring secure and functional project outputs, and aids in the integration of DevOps practices, enhancing collaborative efforts in software solutions creation.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.