OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Sciforma comparison

OpenText and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. OpenText is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while Sciforma is ranked #12. OpenText holds a 5.7% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

3,020 Views
1,691 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

2,166 Views
1,018 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Sciforma compete in the project management software category. Sciforma seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, which makes it a preferred choice over OpenText's pricing advantages.

Features: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers resource management, reporting capabilities, and robust risk management integrating with enterprise systems. Sciforma provides flexibility in customization, advanced analytics, and intuitive navigation. The main difference is Sciforma’s adaptability and data-driven insights compared to OpenText’s structured approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sciforma provides cloud-based deployment with strong customer support, allowing easier access and scalability with dedicated support channels. OpenText offers solid customer service but requires more customization during deployment, which can prolong setup time. Sciforma offers a more straightforward deployment model with quicker implementation than OpenText's extensive configuration process.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText usually involves a higher initial setup cost but ensures a good ROI through comprehensive system coverage and integration. Sciforma is known for its competitive pricing strategy, offering efficient cost management with faster ROI due to its adaptable operations. The primary difference is Sciforma’s ability to deliver value rapidly with cost-effective solutions, while OpenText focuses on long-term benefits through extensive integration and functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 5.7%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management	5.7%
Sciforma	3.9%
Other	90.4%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1905414

PPM SaaS Application Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Gives management a cohesive place for tracking business strategies and goals, but cosmetic aspects need work

I like the ease of customization from an admin perspective. I'm really excited about some of the things that are coming in version 10.0.3 as far as what admins are able to do. I also really like how the program portfolio and project management roll up into each other. That's going to be a really good feature for our organization because we have a lot of things that are related, and it's nice to have things under one umbrella where we can go back to them. I also like the fact that it's not very difficult to integrate with other applications, as long as you have the right people with the right skill sets on board. I have seen us integrate with a couple of other cloud solutions and that was done fairly quickly. It's the ease of use and the ability to customize PPM that really work in our favor. Another useful aspect is that the solution gives us a single place where teams can track and measure progress towards their goals. That it is very important from an upper management perspective. Part of the reason that they're using the application is to have a cohesive place for tracking business strategies and organizational goals, and to only implement projects that line up with them.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the automated calculations, especially on the resource side. When project managers enter their resource requirements into their staffing profiles, they are automatically translated into labor forecast calculations. PPM automates a significant portion of the forecast calculations. Timesheets are also built-in. We automatically process time sheets and bill them accordingly."

"Time Management Resource Management Project Management"

"With PPM allowing us to streamline processes, get them all in one place, and automate handovers and notifications, it saves us between 15 and 20 hours a week on things that we would have otherwise had to do ourselves in emails and other types of coordination."

"The availability of multiple integrated modules is a vital aspect"

"It gives a more organized approach for managing the projects and helps us since many things can be automated using this tool, which were previously done manually."

"It's a very detailed tool. As far as an enterprise is concerned, it gives you the flexibility to manage everything: portfolios, projects, finances, proposals, resources, and time... It takes care of even the minor details that need to be captured. The project management functionality is configured really well within the tool. That stands out."

"There are so many different pieces of functionality, and we use almost every single piece from deployment to demand, project, resource, and time management."

"Demand, project and time management parts of the tool are the most valuable."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"ONE2TEAM revolutionizes the way of working: The cloud based solution for project and portfolio management with very strong collaboration functionality lets executives and team members access their work environment anytime, anywhere to monitor program status, act, and complete a personalized checklist of tasks without the need to send emails or create presentations, simply working together in a dashboard."

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

Cons

"There are some limitations when it comes to attaching receipts. For example, if we are going to buy some non-labor-related assets such as hardware, we are not able to attach the receipts in the Financial Management module in version 9.41."

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView."

"I was not involved in the initial setup. I know that the project involved a lot of consulting that took a long time."

"We had bad experience with technical support. They don't do their best to try to help us solve the case."

"I'm not thrilled. I feel like I get the runaround and I have to explain the issue five different times."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation."

"Stops is complex and configuration is always needed."

"Technical support could be improved. Support is a competitive issue in the market with this tool, at least for medium sized customers."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Construction Company

13%

Insurance Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

Planisware vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 3% of the time

Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Bicore FLIGHTMAP vs Sciforma

Compared 6% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Tenrox Cloud PPM vs Sciforma

Compared 4% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

June 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

June 2026

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

One2team

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides resource planning, project delivery, and governance with an intuitive interface, seamless integrations, and powerful modules for effective project lifecycle management.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management delivers comprehensive portfolio and project management, aligning with business strategies and objectives. The platform features seamless integrations with essential tools like Microsoft Project and Jira, offering powerful modules such as time, demand, and resource management. It enhances decision-making with real-time data visibility, workflow automation, scenario comparison, and customizable dashboards. While offering extensive financial management and the ability to model processes, areas for enhancement include user interface, reporting, resource management, and integration with cloud services. Users also aim for improvements in security and mobile capabilities, alongside upgrades in database support and API usage, seeking a reduction in coding dependency for a better experience.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Intuitive interface: Provides a user-friendly design that simplifies navigation and operation.
Seamless integrations: Compatible with Microsoft Project and Jira, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Powerful modules: Includes time, demand, and resource management for effective control.
Real-time data visibility: Ensures accurate and timely insights for decision-making.
Customizable dashboards: Supports personalized views for improved project monitoring.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Flexibility: Enables modeling of various processes to fit specific business needs.
Comprehensive management: Aligns projects with business strategies.
Workflow automation: Reduces manual efforts, increasing efficiency.
Scenario comparison: Assists in evaluating different project outcomes.
Cost management: Provides extensive financial tools for better budgeting.

Industries leverage OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning and project governance. Organizations deploy modules like Demand, Time, and Resource Management to integrate financials and forecast workloads. The platform aids in project management, demand consolidation, and value-based delivery, facilitating investment management, capacity planning, and workflow optimization. Customization aligns with specific needs, supporting project control, defect tracking, and comprehensive reporting. Clients utilize the system for resourcing requirements and staffing profiles, ensuring effective project lifecycle management tailored to industry demands.

OpenText

Sciforma is a comprehensive project portfolio management tool designed to streamline complex workflows and improve team collaboration, ideal for businesses seeking efficient project execution.

Sciforma facilitates project management by offering a robust platform that integrates planning, tracking, and resource management. It supports businesses in achieving operational efficiency through its customizable structure, flexible reporting, and scalable solutions. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for teams to adopt and integrate into daily operations, ensuring that project objectives align with business goals. Sciforma's flexibility and feature set make it a strategic choice for improving project delivery and enhancing decision-making.

What are the most valuable features of Sciforma?

Resource Management: Dynamic tools to allocate and optimize resources effectively
Project Tracking: Comprehensive tracking capabilities for real-time project insights
Customization: Tailored solutions to fit specific business processes
Reporting: Detailed reports to support business intelligence and decision-making

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Sciforma?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines project processes leading to increased productivity
Cost Management: Better budget control with real-time financial tracking
Scalability: Adapts to business growth and evolving project requirements
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through integrated communication tools

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and construction, Sciforma is implemented to address specific demands like regulatory compliance, financial planning, and milestone tracking. These industries benefit from Sciforma's ability to deliver tailored processes that meet their unique challenges, helping them achieve strategic objectives while maintaining operational efficiency. Sciforma's adaptability ensures it addresses industry-specific project management needs efficiently, making it a preferred tool for experts.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.