OpenText ProVision vs Pega Platform comparison

OpenText and Pega are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #43, while Pega is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to Pega’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Pega users who would recommend it.

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

870 Views
574 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Pega Platform

Read 86 Pega Platform reviews

9,855 Views
4,336 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Pega Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Pega Platform and OpenText ProVision compete in business process management and organizational planning. Pega shows an upper hand in service and cost satisfaction, while OpenText ProVision is preferred for strategic alignment.

Features: Pega Platform is valued for dynamic case management, AI-driven automation, and smooth system integration. OpenText ProVision offers tools for business architecture, process modeling, and strategic planning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pega Platform is known for ease of deployment and comprehensive support for fast implementation. OpenText ProVision deployment is thorough, focusing on strategic integration with potentially longer initial setup times.

Pricing and ROI: Pega Platform, though costly, provides rapid ROI through efficiency and automation. OpenText ProVision involves upfront costs but offers significant ROI in strategic value for long-term impact.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ProVision vs. Pega Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. Pega Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

43rd

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (27th)

Pega Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Rules Management (1st), Process Automation (4th), Rapid Application Development Software (7th), Low-Code Development Platforms (7th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (7th), AI Software Development (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pega Platform is 3.7%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pega Platform	3.7%
OpenText ProVision	0.7%
Other	95.6%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

reviewer4848291

Global Head of Digital, Process Automation at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Pega is a low-code platform that enables organizations to build, automate, and optimize business processes and customer experiences through AI-powered decisioning and workflow automation.

Here are the key areas where Pega Platform could be improved: 1. User Interface (UI) & User Experience (UX) Customization Limitations: The UI layer is tightly coupled with the platform, limiting flexibility for custom front-end development. Constellation Architecture: While it improves consistency, it restricts advanced UI customizations compared to older section-based designs. Learning Curve: Non-technical users find the UI unintuitive despite the low-code promise. 2. Integration & Extensibility Limited Out-of-the-Box Integrations: Users report challenges integrating with non-relational databases and legacy systems. Robotics Integration: Pega RPA (formerly OpenSpan) is not seamlessly integrated with BPM, creating silos in automation. 3. AI & Decisioning AI Capabilities Need Maturity: Users expect more advanced, native AI features without relying on external tools. CDH & Decision Hub: While powerful, these components require deep expertise to configure effectively. 4. Cost & Licensing High Licensing Costs: Pega is often seen as expensive, especially for small and mid-sized enterprises. Lack of Flexible Pricing Models: Calls for subscription-based or usage-based pricing to improve accessibility. 5. Performance & Scalability Scalability Concerns: Some users report performance degradation with large user bases or complex workflows. Upgrade Complexity: Platform upgrades can be time-consuming and disruptive if not planned well. 6. Documentation & Community Support Insufficient Learning Resources: Especially for advanced features, documentation is limited and community support is not as strong as competitors. Talent Availability: Finding skilled Pega professionals remains a challenge in many regions. 7. Low-Code/No-Code Experience Not Fully No-Code: Despite branding, some tasks still require technical intervention, and the drag-and-drop interface can be restrictive 2. Conflict Management: Simultaneous development by multiple users can lead to rule conflicts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"The stability of the product is very good."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"It's a good tool for workflow automation."

"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."

"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."

"The latest releases of PegaRULES are scalable, advanced, and can be easily integrated into your environment."

"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."

"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."

"The most notable feature is the dynamic workflow changes, allowing adjustments without completing the entire cycle. Transitioning from test to build to production was seamless and on the fly, which is something truly remarkable about Pega. Additionally, the workflow creation doesn't require users with extensive technical skills, thanks to its low-code platform, making it accessible and efficient."

More Pega Platform pros

Cons

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to advance the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM."

"In the Middle East and Africa region, Pega was not very strong from the user experience standpoint."

"The product's artificial intelligence capabilities could be improved. More advanced AI features could further optimize process automation and decision-making."

"Containerization should be improved in relation to Pega because Camunda is deployable in the containerization deployment process."

"Reporting is not so clear and not so great. We really struggle to get the right reporting. When we need reporting based on the content of the tickets, we are not able to get it. The MIS reporting is not great. That's one of the reasons why we are switching to ServiceNow. Its compatibility with the higher versions of Internet Explorer should be improved. It really works well in Mozilla Firefox or any other browser, but when it comes to Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer, sometimes, the layout gets disturbed. The positioning of the buttons changes, and there is some distortion in the layout. I am not sure whether it is our configuration problem or Pega's, but when it is working in Mozilla Firefox, it should also work in Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer."

"Customers expect more out-of-the-box solutions."

"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."

"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."

More Pega Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of users."

"May be somewhat more expensive than other solutions initially, but should have enhanced return on investment."

"The licensing model from Pega BPM is too complex and is more expensive than other solutions, such as SAP. The overall price of the solution depends on the use case."

"The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors."

"It is cost-effective for medium enterprises. It is cheaper than ServiceNow."

"In terms of the pricing for Pega BPM, other solutions may be cheaper, but it doesn't matter if Pega BPM has a higher price tag because what's important is that it's the best solution, and that is what people look for. If I would rate the pricing for the solution, I'd give it three out of five. You have to pay extra for additional features in Pega BPM."

"The price of Pega BPM is in the middle range compared to other solutions."

More Pega Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is Pega BPM easy to work with and can beginners utilize this software?

You do need some preparation to be able to use all functions of Pega BPM. However, all users of this platform are in luck as it comes with good documentation and you can learn pretty much everythin...

See all answers

Have you encountered any issues while using Pega BPM and were you assisted by the company?

My company has been using this tool for years and the only issue we have had, if you can call it that, was while setting it up. When we were setting it up initially, we had some drawbacks and could...

See all answers

When you consider the features and benefits of Pega BPM, would you say this product is fairly priced?

Pega BPM can be considered overpriced for some; it all depends on the size of your company and the requirements of your customers. Sure, there are products out there that do the things that Pega B...

See all answers

Comparisons

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 17% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Rational System Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 11% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Camunda vs Pega Platform

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow vs Pega Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Appian vs Pega Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Operational Decision Manager vs Pega Platform

Compared 4% of the time

FICO Blaze Advisor vs Pega Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Pega Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Buyer's Guide

Pega Platform

January 2026

Download Pega Platform product report

Also Known As

Metastorm ProVision

Pega BPM, Pegasystems, SmartBPM, PegaRULES

Overview

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Pega Platform provides flexible business process management with a focus on rapid application development and automation through a low-code approach, enhancing efficiency across sectors.

Pega Platform is renowned for its ability to streamline operations with robust automation features, including robotic process automation and decision-making capabilities. Its intuitive interface and workflow management contribute to a reputation for enhancing business processes. Although users face challenges with integration limitations and high licensing costs, they benefit from rapid deployment and efficient process adaptations. The unified architecture reduces complexity, while case management and integration services support digital transformations in sectors such as banking, insurance, and healthcare.

What are the key features of Pega Platform?

Low-Code Development: Facilitates rapid application development with minimal coding.
Case Management: Efficiently manages complex workflows and cases.
Integration Services: Offers seamless connectivity with diverse systems.
Robotic Process Automation: Automates repetitive tasks for increased productivity.
Decision-Making Capabilities: Enhances process accuracy with advanced decision tools.
Intuitive Interface: Simplifies user interaction and workflow management.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines operations, reducing time and resource usage.
Quick Deployment: Facilitates rapid implementation and adaptability.
Improved Customer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with customer service solutions.
Increased Flexibility: Adapts to changing business requirements effectively.

In industries like insurance, banking, healthcare, and government, Pega Platform is implemented to automate diverse workflows, supporting initiatives from claims processing to customer onboarding. Enterprises use Pega for case management and digital transformations, valuing its out-of-the-box integrations and real-time reporting capabilities to boost operational automation and enhance customer experiences.

Pega

Sample Customers

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. Pega Platform

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText ProVision vs. Pega Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ProVision vs. Pega Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText ProVision vs. Pega Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.