OpenText ProVision vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

OpenText and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #45, while SAP is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

721 Views
454 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 62 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

10,990 Views
5,715 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText ProVision and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in business process management. SAP Signavio seems superior due to its comprehensive features, despite OpenText's advantages in pricing and support.

Features: OpenText ProVision offers robust modeling capabilities, efficient process analysis tools, and a straightforward deployment model. SAP Signavio Process Manager includes collaborative features, extensive reporting, and comprehensive process documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ProVision provides a straightforward deployment model and effective customer support, ensuring smooth integration. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers reliable deployment with proactive customer service and comprehensive training options.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ProVision provides competitive pricing with significant ROI for businesses seeking effective process management. SAP Signavio Process Manager, despite higher setup costs, delivers impressive ROI through its extensive functionality and efficiency improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ProVision vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

45th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (28th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 4.4%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	4.4%
OpenText ProVision	0.6%
Other	95.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Eury Reyes P

Analista sr. de procesos de transformación digital at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reveals real bottlenecks, but pricing and usability need work still require improvement.

SAP Signavio Process Manager could be improved in several areas to make it more competitive and accessible. From my experience, the strongest opportunity lies in enhancing its process mining capabilities. While Signavio offers solid functionality, other tools like Celonis provide deeper insights and more seamless integrations, especially when working with large datasets or complex execution paths. Strengthening the integration layer and expanding native process mining features would significantly elevate the platform. Another area for improvement is pricing. The solution tends to be positioned at a premium level, which can limit adoption compared to other tools that offer similar or stronger capabilities at a more accessible cost. A more flexible or tiered pricing model would make the product more appealing to a broader range of organizations. Regarding usability, while the platform is powerful, it can feel advanced for users who do not have a process engineering background. Improving the user interface and offering more intuitive guidance for non-technical stakeholders would help increase engagement and ease of use across teams. In terms of support, the setup experience is manageable, especially with technical assistance, but there is room for SAP to provide more consistent and accessible support to ensure a smoother learning curve for new users. Overall, enhancements in process mining depth, integration capabilities, pricing flexibility, and user-friendliness would make SAP Signavio Process Manager a more compelling and widely adoptable solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the product is very good."

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview."

"This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning."

"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."

"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager is a good solution that can be used in various organizations."

"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."

"It's easy and fast. It's very quick to work with process teams in terms of improving processes. You just have to send them a URL and to have a process in front of them. I don't use all of the possibilities we have in Signavio. This has made it easier for people to adopt, because when we scrambled the process team together and started a process of improvement, it improved their process. They are much more involved than they had been earlier, and they can also use Signavio to make smaller improvements in the process for themselves. There are many more interactions between the process teams and Signavio than in our previous solution, where you had to hire in a professional process modeler. It's been a great improvement."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Two executives cannot work on one modeling process simultaneously."

"The price can be made cheaper."

"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."

"Part of the product that I think can improve is document control. That's currently not even possible. To work with documents we have something of a workaround using SharePoint."

"It is not easy to learn the product."

"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."

"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."

"The collaboration and commenting are great. However, I think it would be more useful for people to get notifications of comments straight-away so we can react even quicker to them than we already can."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

The price of SAP Signavio Process Manager was quite high but could be afforded by an organization with a sensitive data scale.

See all answers

Comparisons

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 21% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Rational System Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 14% of the time

LeanIX vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 34% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Metastorm ProVision

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ProVision vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText ProVision vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ProVision vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText ProVision vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.