Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Service Manager [EOL] vs SCSM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SCSM
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (11th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (11th)
 

Featured Reviews

MEKKAB Raouf - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Service Manager & Technology Integration DevOps at Djezzy
Excellent pricing with great change management and service management capabilities
We started with version 9.3, and now we're on 9.6 with the full solution, including the CMS. They have lots of options. They propose a full solution for technology and IT service management. We are a telecom company. We are a leader in the market, and therefore, we need to have all details about our own environment and assets. So far, Micro Focus answers all our needs. I'd advise new users to go directly to the SMAX solution, the last, last version of Service Manager. If they are a technical company or information technology company with engineers and developers, they can use it on-premise. If they don't have such competence in the company, they can ask for the solution on the cloud. It is easily available on Microsoft, Amazon, or Google clouds. I'd rate the product nine out of ten.
LuisSanchez3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Metropolitano de Gobierno Digital at a government with 10,001+ employees
Current setup enables smooth problem-solving but lacks comprehensive guidance and local support
More information about setup procedures and a more user-friendly front end would be beneficial. We need more information for setup processes. It is difficult to do the work independently, requiring us to hire external companies for maintenance hours to fix small issues that could be resolved faster in-house if we had better information. We have been looking for an upgrade version, but finding local service has been difficult. It has been challenging trying to get things done. Speaking with the Microsoft office, we found there are no local companies with substantial experience with SCSM. What we have now was installed five or six years ago. It has been difficult to change configurations and look for upgrades, even with all the manuals. Our office is considering moving away from SCSM and getting a service desk solution outside of Microsoft. For me, it has been a good tool to get help and solve internal problems in the office. It is a very good tool, but the difficulty in getting local service or more information is pushing us to look for another tool.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."
"Its flexibility and ease of customization are its most valuable features."
"Technical support is excellent. They really bend over backwards for us."
"Service Manager does what it should, but it's quite outdated."
"Overall, HP will just give you a really great solution."
"Customer Service: Hmm, let's see, that functions pretty well."
"The solution is simple to set up."
"It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents."
"The solution is quite easy to integrate with other Microsoft products."
"SCCM provides remote tool functionality, which is not in Intune."
"If it is correctly configured, you can access and give service quickly to all the end users."
"If it is correctly configured, you can access and give service quickly to all the end users."
"SCSM is easy to learn because all of the material, including training videos, can be found online."
"It is a simple solution that is easy to configure."
"The remote access is one of the features I really enjoy. The pushing of email updates and things like that are very good."
"The solution offers good productivity at a low price point."
 

Cons

"I think one area which is the most painful from my point of view is if you need to integrate a lot of the tools, and being able to make that a lot more seamless."
"Stability was always an issue until we did a full load and performance test, since then this is in good shape."
"We still find ourselves wrapping customizations around it more than we would like, and we still find the upgrade path more costly and time consuming than we would hope."
"My big concern is that HPE made a decision in its last dot release to change the way that these improvements and enhancements are done by the end user."
"We're coming to end-of-life on the product we've got."
"Micro Focus Service Manager is not very great. It would be better if it had more features. When it comes to features, BMC tops the chart. When it comes to usage, people use BMC more."
"Stability was a major issue in older versions of the product."
"I don't see anything lacking."
"My company had planned a few months ago to apply SCSM over the cloud in order to provide updates, like regular updates, but it had to be put through a few tools from Microsoft on the cloud, which was not easy."
"The logs and reporting-related features of the product have certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"We would like to see a web-based interface that works on mobile devices."
"The solution could be more simple. For example, it takes a lot of work to create reports. It runs on Microsoft SQL queries. Creating custom reports on ManageEngine takes less work from the administrator."
"Although some engineers at Microsoft are good, the support often lacks expertise, and response times are slow."
"The product needs to improve its integration with other tools. It also needs to have a better UI and a simple dashboard."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"The major issues with SCSM include its severe slowness, especially on the client side, and the lack of comprehensive reporting tools."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."
"The license is not cheap."
"I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."
"HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."
"Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."
"The platform is competitively priced."
"The price should be lower."
"It comes free with the enterprise agreement that we have, but the expense really is in having to buy another product to sit on top of it to make it work properly. You wind up having to buy additional support and additional product with their own support and maintenance costs on top of that."
"The license for SCSM is cheap."
"Licensing can be complex and confusing."
"It is a lower price vs. other things on the market."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"It is an expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Marketing Services Firm
12%
Performing Arts
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
15%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise38
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SCSM?
The solution offers good productivity at a low price point.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCSM?
I am not sure about the pricing as I do not have experience with it.
What needs improvement with SCSM?
More information about setup procedures and a more user-friendly front end would be beneficial. We need more information for setup processes. It is difficult to do the work independently, requiring...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager
System Center Service Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

resultspositive, Globicon
Fibabanka, UMC Health System
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.