Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs PTC Integrity comparison

OpenText and PTC are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while PTC is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7. OpenText holds a 4.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 68% of PTC users who would recommend it.
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews
  • 3,237 Views
  • 3,075 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
PTC Integrity
Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews
  • 1,808 Views
  • 1,808 Comparison Views
68% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

PTC Integrity and OpenText Software Delivery Management compete in software development process enhancement. OpenText appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced collaboration and reporting features, which many find justify its higher costs.

Features: PTC Integrity provides robust integration with third-party tools, comprehensive configuration management, and enhances traceability and control. OpenText Software Delivery Management offers advanced collaboration, superior reporting tools, and lifecycle visibility, making it a feature-rich solution important for organizations seeking complete solutions.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could improve by enhancing user interface intuitiveness, simplifying its integration with other software, and expanding its out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. OpenText Software Delivery Management might focus on lowering its pricing structure, improving its initial setup complexity, and enhancing user training resources to fully utilize its features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PTC Integrity offers flexible on-premises and cloud deployment options with responsive customer service, aiding smooth implementation. OpenText Software Delivery Management has a streamlined cloud-based deployment model complemented by extensive support options, providing flexibility and swift integration beneficial for tech-centric environments.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity is attractive with its initial cost structure and potential for high ROI through long-term operational efficiency savings. OpenText Software Delivery Management, while having higher upfront costs, is perceived as providing strong ROI due to its enhanced feature set and reduced time to market. Despite higher pricing, OpenText is often seen delivering more value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (9th)
PTC Integrity
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
12th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 4.5%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.2%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Software Delivery Management4.5%
PTC Integrity4.2%
Other91.3%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

PE
Peter-Paul Eijkenboom
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Generating audit evidence effortlessly saves time and money
OpenText ALM Octane is a new product with full development ongoing, where new ideas are launched regularly. Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes. This efficiency is especially valuable for audits required by financial regulators.
Read full review
AS
Srikumar Aravinda Krishnan
Lead Engineer at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Unified platform streamlines workflows though user interface needs improvement
The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities. By using PTC Integrity, we have a unified platform that eliminates the need to switch between different systems for hardware and software tasks. This integration fosters real-time collaboration, allowing vendors to efficiently transfer details and share data through PTC Integrity. The platform also enables us to raise reports that other team members can access and utilize. Furthermore, the stable nature of the solution enhances its value, contributing to seamless operations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The user experience is a lot better than any tool that I have used before. Overall, it is great. It has a smooth interface, which is very user-friendly. It makes it easier to work together and have more transparency and customization, which is very good."
"With an Octane project, we have our automation, our requirements, our tests, our pipeline into build-and-deploy, and the ability to identify problem areas. It makes things quicker because it's more along the lines of an automated process."
"There are a lot of predefined reports. We can attach additional reports for users, like who worked on what defect and when, as well as what is the status of the release compared to the previous release. It is really endless. All the data is really linked together. Then, if all the data is linked together, there is an option to prepare reports out of it. We are very impressed with its reporting capabilities."
"On the user side, what I like a lot is the reporting capabilities. There's no tool, to my knowledge, that gets anywhere close to Octane at the moment when it comes to the reporting capabilities. I can do everything with the reporting. There's nothing missing. I have all the options. I can create graphs, including graphs of several types and looks."
"It is a very stable tool. The tool has been in the industry for so many years. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The feature I found most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its ability to integrate with the CI/CD stack."
"It's more streamlined because we have it all under one umbrella. And once the business requirements and rules have been created, we can do test cases and apply them to the business rules."
"People really how easy it is to customize. In some previous tools, that has been very limited, or you had to know how to write code to do some of the customizations, or it was very confusing. Going back to the user interface, they've made the customization of the tool, the workspace settings, very easy for people to figure out and use."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros
"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."
"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."
"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."
"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."
"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."
"PTC Integrity has good stability."
"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."
"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."
More PTC Integrity pros
 

Cons

"There is an opportunity for them to do a little more with the dashboarding. We still feel that HPE Quality Center/HPE ALM reporting is very powerful. We talked with R&D, and there are some things on their roadmap, but at the same time, their strategy is to connect Octane with visualization tools such as Power BI."
"Documentation is not clear."
"The reporting needs to be improved and allow for customization. I want to build my own widgets, but I don't want to use the ones already in the system. I want to build mine from scratch."
"The limitation of Octane is that we can't do a release outside of the sprint. We can only plan the release in the sprint. With Agile and JIRA tools, we can plan the release outside the sprint and do a global release of all the projects from the sprint."
"They don't support all IDEs yet. We have Visual Studio code, which is not supported, and loved by our developers. This integration is missing. We also had to do our own in-house integration with the Confluence. That is also something that they could add."
"Also, while there is a Requirements Module in Octane, it is very plain. It's okay to have some requirements described there, but it's not really following the whole BDD approach. I would like to have more features for requirements in there."
"It could use just some small improvements. I would like additional features, like planning features, user story mapping, or connection to collaboration tools."
"The solution should improve by adding scrum board-like functionality."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons
"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."
"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."
"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."
"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."
"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."
"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."
"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."
"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."
More PTC Integrity cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it's comparable to what we had previously. It's not priced at the higher end of the scale by any means. It's priced nicely, in the middle of the market. For what you're getting, it's a very good tool."
"It's expensive. HPE products, and now Micro Focus, have always been expensive. The license is not cheap, and it will always be a challenge, particularly for small organizations like ours."
"The senior management of my company handles the purchases of the solution. However, the price per developer was a major reason we switched from Jira. Apart from the complexity and the support, the price was a major reason that a team of 20 people unanimously decided that we would prefer to go with Micro Focus ALM Octane rather than Jira. The senior management had seen some benefit in it and they preferred it over Jira because the per developer cost was less and the support was superior."
"If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."
"Microsoft is a big challenge for Micro Focus when it comes to pricing because they are much cheaper. But it definitely depends on the complexity of the environment. If it has multiple technologies, at that point, looking at other options and Microsoft would be a feasible approach."
"It's pretty pricey, one of the most expensive ones on the market... The value depends on if you use all the features that it has. It comes with a lot of features. The difference between the license structure of ALM and Octane versus JIRA, is that you get everything with ALM and Octane... For JIRA, you buy the pieces one piece at a time."
"There is a conversion fee for changing licenses."
"The tool's price is extremely high."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice
"The product is expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
10%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet...
See all answers
What do you like most about PTC Integrity?
I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?
PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?
The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 36% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 16% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 7% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 6% of the time
Polarion ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Polarion ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors
Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity Logo
Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity
Compared 48% of the time
Jira vs PTC Integrity Logo
Jira vs PTC Integrity
Compared 11% of the time
Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity Logo
Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity
Compared 6% of the time
More PTC Integrity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management
January 2026
OpenText Software Delivery Management reportDownload OpenText Software Delivery Management product report
Buyer's Guide
PTC Integrity
January 2026
PTC Integrity reportDownload PTC Integrity product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
MKS
 

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?
  • Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
  • Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
  • Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
  • Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
  • Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?
  • Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
  • Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
  • Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
  • Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
  • Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText
The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
PTC
 

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
TRW Automotive
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity
December 2025
Free Report: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.