OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Tricentis LiveCompare comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #27. OpenText holds a 5.6% mindshare in ALM, compared to Tricentis’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

4,801 Views
4,513 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Tricentis LiveCompare

Read 1 Tricentis LiveCompare review

819 Views
442 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Tricentis LiveCompare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Tricentis LiveCompare and OpenText Software Delivery Management are competing products enhancing software delivery. Tricentis LiveCompare holds an advantage due to its customer satisfaction, while OpenText Software Delivery Management is favored for advanced features.

Features: Tricentis LiveCompare provides impact analysis, risk-based testing, and integration with various testing tools. OpenText Software Delivery Management is notable for delivery and deployment capabilities and offers real-time analytics. OpenText's broad features suit complex enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis LiveCompare ensures user-friendly deployment and reliable customer service focused on quick issue resolution. OpenText Software Delivery Management has a more complex deployment, supporting large-scale operations with extensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis LiveCompare is known for cost-effectiveness with lower initial setup costs and promising ROI. OpenText Software Delivery Management, though more costly upfront, justifies its price with superior functionality and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)

Tricentis LiveCompare

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

27th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 5.6%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis LiveCompare is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Software Delivery Management	5.6%
Tricentis LiveCompare	0.9%
Other	93.5%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

Generating audit evidence effortlessly saves time and money

OpenText ALM Octane is a new product with full development ongoing, where new ideas are launched regularly. Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes. This efficiency is especially valuable for audits required by financial regulators.

Read full review

it_user713811

Product Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade

The LiveCompare apps that my customers and I have benefitted from the most are analyses and reports on the following: * Upgrades – LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality accurately identifies what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade. * Migration to SAP Hana – LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time. * SAP License management optimization. * Custom code analytics – Includes usage monitoring, quality and performance monitoring, Java analysis, and ABAP code quality. * Testing - LiveCompare optimizes the entire testing phase in upgrade projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very stable tool. The tool has been in the industry for so many years. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"It’s easy to set up."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the reports. We are able to do customization."

"Current version of the solution is fairly stable."

"The solution natively supports Agile-Waterfall hybrid software development at an enterprise scale. This is very important to us. Because even though the company wishes to go Agile, we still have projects which follow a Waterfall methodology. In order for us to accommodate both, we needed some sort of hybrid system. Because if we are using a fully Agile system, then the reporting might not be correctly extracted."

"The way testing is closely tied into the product Backlog has made it more intuitive, or easier to manage the relationship between building out an application and testing it. In other tools, that is more segregated. The way it's designed in Octane, people have said it makes more sense to them, and that it's easier for them to understand their data and to maintain and test their solutions."

"There are a lot of predefined reports. We can attach additional reports for users, like who worked on what defect and when, as well as what is the status of the release compared to the previous release. It is really endless. All the data is really linked together. Then, if all the data is linked together, there is an option to prepare reports out of it. We are very impressed with its reporting capabilities."

"The benefits I've mentioned can be reflected as monetary benefits, which I would estimate at 35 percent annually."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros

"Using LiveCompare allows us to automate many of the required tasks while gaining access to data needed to optimize our SAP environments with fewer resources than before."

"LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."

"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."

Cons

"I haven't been impressed with the reporting from a requirements matrix and a traceability perspective."

"The reporting side of ALM Octane could do with a few areas of improvement. There is not enough flexibility in the way that we can cut up the data to report on certain things."

"There's a trend in our requests to have the ability to export data, en masse, out of Octane. There are capabilities within Octane to export data, but there are specifics around test suites and requirements and relations, as well as certain attributes, that we would like to be able to export easily out of Octane and into a database or Excel."

"When I manage projects that are being created in ALM, I have a standard template, but I don't have a template for them in Octane. I literally have to create the project from the ground up every time, which for an administrator, is a nightmare solution"

"The reporting needs to be improved and allow for customization. I want to build my own widgets, but I don't want to use the ones already in the system. I want to build mine from scratch."

"The limitation of Octane is that we can't do a release outside of the sprint."

"Development of extensions or connections to GitHub actions could be better. Better integration with Azure DevOps would also help."

"Improvements could be made by way of additional integrations across the lifecycle."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons

"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."

"Microsoft is a big challenge for Micro Focus when it comes to pricing because they are much cheaper. But it definitely depends on the complexity of the environment. If it has multiple technologies, at that point, looking at other options and Microsoft would be a feasible approach."

"In my opinion, it's good value for the price that you pay."

"The product is highly priced compared to other tools."

"Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."

"The solution has reduced our testing costs."

"The tool's price is extremely high."

"It's expensive. HPE products, and now Micro Focus, have always been expensive. The license is not cheap, and it will always be a challenge, particularly for small organizations like ours."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice

"IntelliCorp is flexible in terms of licensing and the pricing structure. They are open to discussing a customer's specific requirements."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

11%

Transportation Company

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	34

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 35% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian ALM vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 19% of the time

Deloitte SAP Services vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 15% of the time

Jira vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 15% of the time

Avantra vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 14% of the time

More Tricentis LiveCompare Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

April 2026

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2026

Download Tricentis LiveCompare product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

No data available

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Tricentis LiveCompare provides advanced analytics and smart automation, enhancing testing efficiency and accuracy for SAP landscapes.

Designed for complex environments, Tricentis LiveCompare specializes in impact analysis, offering real-time insights that minimize risks and enhance decision-making processes in SAP system updates and changes. Its intelligent analytics help identify and prioritize critical test cases, reducing unnecessary tests.

What are the most valuable features of Tricentis LiveCompare?

Impact Analysis: Identifies changed elements to focus on critical areas.
Test Optimization: Reduces test volumes while maintaining quality.
Smart Analytics: Provides actionable insights for informed decisions.
Automation Integration: Seamlessly supports continuous testing frameworks.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Tricentis LiveCompare?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers testing costs with targeted approaches.
Time Savings: Accelerates test cycles through optimized processes.
Risk Reduction: Decreases deployment risks with precise impact assessments.
Quality Assurance: Enhances product quality with thorough testing insights.

Tricentis LiveCompare is implemented in industries such as finance and retail where maintaining high system reliability during updates is crucial. Its analytical capabilities support robust testing processes, ensuring operational stability and efficiency across complex SAP systems.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Coca-Cola, eBay, BP, British American Tobacco, Surrey Country Council, AES, P66, MUD, Bentley Motors, Coats, Hershey, Kimberly Clark

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.