Opsview vs Pandora FMS comparison

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

7,030 Views
3,656 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Opsview

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Opsview and Pandora FMS are two prominent IT monitoring solutions. Opsview has the upper hand with its ease of use and robust alerting system, while Pandora FMS stands out with its flexibility and customization options for tailored solutions.

Features: Opsview offers superior alerting capabilities, comprehensive monitoring templates, and straightforward configuration and management. Pandora FMS provides extensive customization, scalability, and supports a wide range of data sources and integrations.

Room for Improvement: Opsview requires better documentation, more advanced reporting features, and enhancements in agent performance. Pandora FMS needs to address its initial setup complexity, improve user support, and refine certain customization processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview's deployment is simple with responsive customer support. Pandora FMS has a more complex deployment but offers robust support and detailed customization assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview has reasonable pricing with a good return on investment. Pandora FMS pricing is fair given its high customization potential, though it involves higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Opsview vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: October 2026).

Opsview vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Opsview

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

40th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

21st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

39th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

64th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

26th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

59th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

38th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (59th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Opsview is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.0%
Pandora FMS	0.7%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The system is very robust and very rarely breaks."

"The most valuable feature of Opsview is the ability to clone the services when you're monitoring something out of the test setup."

"With the monitoring capabilities, I can tell when things happen and be proactive about them instead of constantly putting out fires."

"What was very compelling about OpsView was that we could dial out the noise and have meaningful and actionable alerts."

"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."

"Customer service is great; always responsive, within minutes at times."

"Over the past three years, we've grown by about 200%, and the system has been able to manage that growth."

"Very easy-to-use interface, especially starting from v5 onwards Advanced tweaking possibilities Netflow"

More Opsview pros

"The official forum is active enough to answer most of the high-end technical questions that you may have."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"We are consultants and thanks to Pandora can detect a lot of disasters that other companies can't, and we can offer high availability of the system to the client."

"The solution is so lightweight that with only 4GB of ram, it allows keeping track of up to two hundred agents from a single console."

"Network monitoring is fun again with Pandora FMS."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"We are starting to hit the limits of how we can scale out."

"There is one feature that I've been requesting for a while now. Going back to this multi-tenancy thing, right now the tenants can't create their own service checks, so that's still a process they have to get with us."

"There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well."

"In Opsview 4.6.3, there is no provision for making bulk changes to monitored servers via the GUI, though it is possible to custom-script bulk changes via the API."

"SNMP traps management to be improved."

"I wish they'd update the iOS app, which, I think, is the same version I used back in 2012 or so."

"We have had some stability issues, but that is largely because we're using an unsupported database."

"Hard to say, some minor changes could help improve ease of configuring (which have already been requested and are now on the roadmap)."

More Opsview cons

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"Their support is good, but it is just online communication. It would be great to be able to just call someone and talk to them instead of always writing. It works well for me because I am a decent communicator in email, but some people might find it difficult to describe in a written fashion and communicate with them that way. There is a learning curve to the interface, but once you get used to it, it is actually very powerful. They have a lot of options, but people struggle with the interface. They've improved it though, and it is getting better. They need to keep improving the learning curve to help buy-in. I'm the guy that manages it, so I'm comfortable with it. They can refine the upgrade agents to be easier. They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way. It has a complete GUI and everything."

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive."

"They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way."

"We would like the real-time monitoring of an interface to be improved within this solution."

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS."

"I would like to have a dashboard with all assets displayed, with a quick hover-over status."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Construction Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

20%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 5% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios Core vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

Nmap vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Pandora FMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Opsview

Download Opsview product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

No data available

Overview

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Pandora FMS offers comprehensive monitoring for IT infrastructure and services, supporting hybrid environments and enhancing operational efficiency with customizable architecture and seamless tool integration.

Pandora FMS provides a user-friendly platform for monitoring servers, network devices, and applications across virtual and cloud environments. Its agent options, centralized management, and high availability configurations allow it to support extensive network infrastructures. Offering robust alarm systems and lightweight operation, it adapts to enterprise needs, whether large or small. Users benefit from flexible metrics and plugins, although improvements in automation, analytics, and expanded API integration are anticipated. Challenges include interface instability in older versions and the need for improved dashboard customization, real-time monitoring, and cloud integration.

What features does Pandora FMS offer?

All-in-One Monitoring: Supports a wide range of platforms and devices for comprehensive visibility.
Customizable Architecture: Integrates seamlessly with external tools for tailored solutions.
High Availability Configurations: Ensures continuous monitoring and operation.
Flexible Metrics and Plugins: Enables tailored monitoring setups for diverse needs.

What are the benefits and ROI?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes and improves time management.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructures without sacrificing performance.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing IT tools and environments.
Comprehensive Coverage: Provides extensive oversight across a variety of platforms and environments.

In specific industries, Pandora FMS is utilized for IT service supervision, infrastructure monitoring, and network device management. Organizations leverage it to maintain network quality, ensure compliance, predict issues, and manage inventory and security. It supports both remote desktops and clients' systems, making it valuable for generating SLA reports and monitoring hybrid server environments. Pandora FMS's adaptability allows it to serve diverse sectors by facilitating efficient supervision and control.

Sample Customers

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Opsview vs. Pandora FMS