Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Oracle and Parasoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #26, while Parasoft is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.7. Oracle holds a 1.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Parasoft’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

2,982 Views
1,730 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

6,107 Views
2,870 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Oracle Application Testing Suite compete in the software testing tools category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand in API testing capabilities while Oracle Application Testing Suite excels in integration with Oracle products.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest leverages robust API testing capabilities with support for SOAP, REST services, data-driven testing, and multiple scripting languages. It provides seamless integration and virtualization for comprehensive testing scenarios. Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates well with Oracle products, offering functional, load, and performance testing within Oracle ecosystems. It provides load testing with monitoring features and a user-friendly interface for creating customized testing scenarios.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest needs enhancements in reporting, a more intuitive interface, and improved support for complex integrations. Additionally, expanding community resources could aid usability. Oracle Application Testing Suite should enhance cross-platform support, especially for desktop applications, and streamline licensing policies for easier management and automation needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer flexible deployment options, including hybrid cloud environments. Parasoft SOAtest's technical support can have delays in response, whereas Oracle's straightforward licensing and integration with Oracle products enhance its customer experience and attractiveness.

Pricing and ROI: While Parasoft SOAtest is more expensive due to its feature set, it justifies the cost for comprehensive testing requirements. Oracle Application Testing Suite is considered cost-effective for Oracle environments and often features within broader Oracle packages, providing accessible integration and enhanced return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Parasoft SOAtest

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Load Testing Tools (17th)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (22nd), API Testing Tools (8th), Test Automation Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 2.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	2.7%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.5%
Other	95.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This tool did a much better job recording the http requests during web load testing than other open source tools."

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature, the recording feature is the prime feature that open script has, and I also like the connectivity with Oracle Forms as it is very compatible."

"Now I feel its the best tool to automate any of the Oracle Products, which include Oracle EBS Applications, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, Adobe Flex, ADF applications, etc.."

"For a few years, OATS was the only tool that allowed us to load test our Computer Telephone Integration (CTI) with Siebel."

"The solution is scalable."

"My advice to others is if they are using any Oracle Cloud Fusion-based or on-premise-based application, this is a good solution to use."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"It has allowed us to build a large library of repeatable automated tests that are able to be quickly executed on demand."

"Utilizing features that support Data Driven testing and E2E has increased efficiencies drastically."

"SOATest provided a platform for automated testing and creating an enriched automated regression suite."

"It enabled an easy integration of our adjacent platform that was for full automation, and we did reach over 97% automation with the use of this tool."

"This is the best tool for API and back-end automation."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"The solution is scalable."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"There is one piece of functionality that is currently not offered and would be very good to have: Support for Digital Certificates authentication and Single Sign-On (SSO)."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"I think that licensing policies could be more intuitive; when we installed this application for the first time, we couldn't understand why there were only two users."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"Performance is slow as compared to other tools like QTP."

"OATS has some promising features that frankly we wish we could utilize, but so far we haven’t had much luck doing so."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"Sadly, almost everything needs improving."

"The need to refresh 'Test Case Explorer' when adding a data source or environment file, can be improved."

"I personally feel that 50% of Parasoft features are provided by SoapUI free of cost."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"We noticed that our project workspace is sometimes corrupted without any reason."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"Work file [tst] gradually increases in size due to saving or updates of workspace. I can see a major improvement in that."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 3% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

July 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

July 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

OATS

SOAtest

Overview

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Parasoft SOAtest

June 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.