Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Oracle and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Planview is ranked #14. Oracle holds a 4.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Read 13 Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management reviews

1,603 Views
657 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

1,148 Views
528 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and Planview Daptiv are competing products in the project portfolio management category. Research indicates that Planview Daptiv holds a notable edge due to its superior suite of features, despite Oracle Primavera's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management includes comprehensive project planning, advanced resource management capabilities, and risk analysis tools. Planview Daptiv focuses on flexibility with customizable workflows and strong integration capabilities. Primavera offers depth in project analytics, while Daptiv provides broader integration options, which makes it more adaptable to diverse organizational needs.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Primavera could enhance its user interface for a more intuitive experience and reduce deployment complexity. It would benefit from improving integration capabilities with other third-party applications. Planview Daptiv could enhance its project analytics for deeper insights, expand its out-of-the-box reporting templates, and improve training documentation for onboarding users more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Primavera requires more time for deployment due to its complexity but offers solid customer support once implemented. Planview Daptiv has a more intuitive deployment process, reducing the time to productivity and is backed by responsive customer service. Daptiv's ease of deployment and strong support network is an advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has a higher setup cost, which can affect initial ROI but is seen as cost-effective in the long term due to its robust features. Planview Daptiv, despite a somewhat higher price tag, shows better ROI attributed to its quick deployment and flexible structures. Daptiv's pricing aligns well with its benefits, leading to quicker returns on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Primavera Portfolio ...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is 4.2%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management	4.2%
Planview Daptiv	3.1%
Other	92.7%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Cynnie Ruminjo

Senior Software Engineer at Well

Project teams have improved collaboration and have delivered complex portfolios on time

The best features Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management offers include a great user experience, as Oracle has invested heavily in user experience. The application is intuitive and user-friendly, and it also includes project budgeting, cost capitalization, expenses, embedded analytics, and data visualizations that come built-in with the software. The embedded analytics and data visualizations in Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management specifically help us make data-driven decisions from the accurate insights gathered from different sources. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has positively impacted my organization by increasing predictability. It has brought awareness to the executive level with the ability to integrate with other systems, which is flawless and seamless, thus enhancing collaboration in my organization. We have been able to deliver projects on time to our clients, meeting the deadlines and timelines while also hitting the cost timelines. The use of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has increased the odds of timely project delivery through efficient tracking. The software supports mobile and tablets with a modern user interface featuring embedded analytics, enabling project team members to access all their tools and information in our organization. The efficiency of project managers has increased, allowing them to manage multiple projects and thereby lowering the cost by approximately thirty percent.

Read full review

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's tech support is good."

"Delay analysis and extension of time claims are some of the key features."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has definitely had a positive impact on the organization."

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."

"It is very, very good in planning for large projects."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has positively impacted my organization by increasing predictability, bringing awareness to the executive level with flawless and seamless integration to other systems, enhancing collaboration, enabling us to deliver projects on time while hitting cost timelines, and increasing project managers' efficiency to manage multiple projects and lower costs by approximately thirty percent."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has one of the nice dashboards because it gives the company a clear picture on the way a project is going."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management pros

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

More Planview Daptiv pros

Cons

"For us in LATAM, the pricing is extremely high. That is why I only work with oil and gas and mining industries because they have substantial budgets."

"There is a need for improvement in the interfacing and possibly better integration with other programs."

"PCM does not provide any flexibility in positioning fields."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management does not require many improvements, but one area lacking is the incorporation of chat and artificial intelligence, which need significant improvement."

"I would rate the technical support by Oracle at five out of ten."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management can be improved because the cost is a bit high and it is not suitable for those working on a tight budget."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management cons

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

More Planview Daptiv cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution itself is cost-effective."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."

"The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."

"My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management has been very positive. The cost is very cost-effective compared to other alternatives, and I am ver...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

One area for improvement for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is that printing from the software can be difficult, and some of the views in Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management are hard to ad...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management?

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management provides comprehensive project oversight tools, including project scheduling, resources, resource management, and portfolio oversight functionality. These tool...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Adobe Workfront vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 14% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

Planisware vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 6% of the time

Jira vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 5% of the time

EcoSys vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

monday.com vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Deltek Vision vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

March 2026

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report

Download Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

March 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

Primavera Portfolio Management, OPPM

No data available

Overview

Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.

Oracle

Daptiv by Changepoint is an industry-leading Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solution that helps businesses connect strategy to execution. Plan and monitor your portfolios from a top-down perspective to ensure you’re investing in the right projects to align with the overarching goals of your business.

Planview

Sample Customers

Yarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

March 2026

Free Report: Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.