Oracle WebCenter vs SharePoint comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Oracle is ranked #17, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 1.9% mindshare in ECM, compared to Microsoft’s 15.9% mindshare. Additionally, 70% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle WebCenter

Read 12 Oracle WebCenter reviews

1,106 Views
675 Comparison Views

70% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 162 SharePoint reviews

9,649 Views
4,535 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Oracle WebCenter

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SharePoint and Oracle WebCenter compete in the enterprise content management space. SharePoint generally has the upper hand due to its lower pricing and strong support services, appealing to cost-conscious organizations.

Features: SharePoint offers robust document management and team collaboration capabilities. It seamlessly integrates with Microsoft Office products, providing essential tools for efficient workplace communication. Oracle WebCenter is distinguished by its advanced content management, expansive enterprise portals, and comprehensive application integrations.

Room for Improvement: SharePoint can improve its scalability options and enhance integration with non-Microsoft products. Additionally, expanding its customization capabilities could serve more complex user needs. Oracle WebCenter's interface could be more user-friendly, and the deployment process simplified. Further expansion in native mobile support options would also benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePoint's cloud-based model facilitates quick setup and easy scaling, complemented by reliable customer support. In contrast, Oracle WebCenter, while flexible in deployment, is perceived as more complex, demanding significant technical expertise, although it comes with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: SharePoint is typically more budget-friendly with lower setup costs, delivering quicker ROI, making it ideal for organizations focusing on cost efficiency. Oracle WebCenter incurs higher initial costs but promises higher ROI through its extensive enterprise-grade functionalities, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive content management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle WebCenter

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

17th

Ranking in Web Content Management

11th

Ranking in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)

6th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (35th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

1st

Ranking in Web Content Management

1st

Ranking in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

162

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Oracle WebCenter is 1.9%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 15.9%, down from 20.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Mehdi Hasankhan

Head of Development and Implementation at Arak Petrochemical Company

Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products

WebCenter content access has a lot of options and flexibility. At this time, I only see one problem: in the sub-content and channels surrounding Windows 10. It only functions with Windows 7 and Windows 8. All of the operating systems in my company are up-to-date and we are using Windows 10. For whatever reason, you can't use the Oracle content on these platforms at all. This lapse is very bad for my company because I can't change the version of Word and downgrade. Maybe it is just a technical problem. But it is a lot of my problem with this solution currently.

Read full review

Madhur D'silva

Lead Consultant at Eviden

Collaborative work benefits while user-friendliness challenges persist

The most valuable feature of SharePoint is its user interface, which is very easy to use. I do not have to be very technical to use it. Its rights management capabilities and ability to restrict access to certain people are also very useful. Furthermore, I can access SharePoint from any device, whether it is a phone or laptop, which is very convenient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integration within the solution is very good."

"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."

"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."

"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."

"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."

"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."

"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."

"This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."

"The stability of SharePoint is high."

"Ability to store files of any type."

"It has an easy to distribute administration capability, and can also scale to meet a large number of future needs."

"The search feature is valuable."

"SharePoint acts as a version control system, allowing easy recovery of past document versions."

"The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution."

"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."

"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."

"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."

"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."

"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."

"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."

"Its functions need more stability."

"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."

"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."

"I have been facing some challenges when using SharePoint, as the workflows freeze at times, so there is a maintenance activity which needs to be done periodically."

"There's room for improvement in the search functionality, although it has matured significantly over the years."

"The initial setup was very complex."

"The support is the worst. It is bad when Microsoft support does not even know what to do and you have to tell them. Also, they take too long to solve a problem."

"The technical support process should be more streamlined as it usually involves contacting vendors and arranging calls for resolution."

"Make it more intuitive."

"We would like more security features, like automating."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."

"The price needs to be lowered."

"The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"SharePoint is included with our Microsoft license."

"The pricing is competitive."

"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."

"The platform has medium pricing."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The data classification and search elements are cheap."

"We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SharePoint?

The search feature is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

As SharePoint is part of the Microsoft 365 suite, the pricing is acceptable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

Not with SharePoint specifically, but overall with the software or tools from Microsoft, I think there are areas that need improvement. It's very difficult to understand the objective. There are so...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Content Management vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 20% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 14% of the time

WordPress Business-Enterprise vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 9% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 8% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Oracle WebCenter

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle WebCenter Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 8% of the time

DocuSign vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon WorkDocs vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

WordPress Business-Enterprise vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebCenter

August 2025

Download Oracle WebCenter product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

July 2025

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

WebCenter, FatWire

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies.

Oracle

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint

July 2025

Free Report: Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors, best Web Content Management vendors, and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.