Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security vs Phosphorus Cybersecurity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Phosphorus Cybersecurity
Ranking in IoT Security
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 6.2%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Phosphorus Cybersecurity is 3.7%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security6.2%
Phosphorus Cybersecurity3.7%
Other90.1%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Ahsan Riaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Information Security Officer at Packages Group
Responsive system enhances network management but integration needs refinement
I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage. As an insurance company in the financial sector, we must meet strict regulatory requirements, and Palo Alto has proven to be an excellent solution. Its management is straightforward, the dashboards and reporting are comprehensive, and most importantly, it functions exactly as described in the documentation. For example, when we needed to block YouTube on our network, Palo Alto successfully blocked access while our Cisco firewall failed to block access on iPhones. This highlights the inconsistency we've experienced with different firewalls, whereas Palo Alto has consistently performed as expected.
Use Phosphorus Cybersecurity?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
19%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Armis, Palo Alto Networks and others in IoT Security. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.