No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo

Top 10 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Alternatives

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Forescout Platform, Nozomi Networks, and Armis. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security surpasses its competitors by offering advanced machine learning capabilities, integrated threat prevention, and automated policy recommendations, ensuring comprehensive device visibility and security for all IoT environments.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform provides extensive endpoint visibility and network access control, integrating well with third-party products. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security offers granular zero trust policies with next-generation firewall integration, though it may not address all security requirements independently.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report
Forescout Platform involves moderate initial setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is known for lower upfront costs, highlighting a key difference in pricing structures between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform involves moderate initial setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is known for lower upfront costs, highlighting a key difference in pricing structures between the two solutions.
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Nozomi Networks
4.5 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Nozomi Networks
4.5 out of 5
Nozomi Networks offers competitive pricing and excellent support with a focus on real-time analytics and anomaly detection, making it suitable for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks justifies its higher setup cost with comprehensive features, advanced threat prevention, and cloud integration.
Download Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report
Nozomi Networks has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, highlighting the initial cost differences between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Nozomi Networks has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, highlighting the initial cost differences between the solutions.
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Armis offers competitive pricing and intuitive deployment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with rapid ROI. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, with its advanced threat intelligence, requires a higher initial investment but provides robust features justifying long-term savings on security breaches.
Download Armis vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report
Armis offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Palo Alto Networks IoT Security involves a more comprehensive setup process which may entail higher upfront expenses. The distinct setup approaches reflect differing priorities in integration simplicity versus extensiv...
View comparison
Pricing
Armis offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Palo Alto Networks IoT Security involves a more comprehensive setup process which may entail higher upfront expenses. The distinct setup approaches reflect differing priorities in integration simplicity versus extensiv...
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall emphasizes scalability and management, suitable for complex deployments with robust customer support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security focuses on seamless integration and application-based controls, providing advanced risk assessment and strong network monitoring, appealing to those prioritizing thorough security measures.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, with notable differences in initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, with notable differences in initial pricing.
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for IoT
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security appeals for its competitive pricing, ease of use, and quick deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for IoT offers seamless Azure integration and advanced analytics, justifying higher costs with its extensive feature set and comprehensive ecosystem benefits.
Download Microsoft Defender for IoT vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security often features higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, providing different value depending on the user's infrastructure requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security often features higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, providing different value depending on the user's infrastructure requirements.
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Phosphorus Cybersecurity
1 out of 5
Phosphorus Cybersecurity excels in IoT device protection offering automated updates and vulnerability assessments. Its ease of integration is valuable yet there is room for improvement in customer support and documentation. Enhanced reporting features could further benefit users by providing more detailed insights into security status.
View comparison
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Azure Sphere
3.8 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Azure Sphere
3.8 out of 5
Azure Sphere offers robust, affordable IoT security focusing on end-to-end device protection. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security provides extensive feature sets with advanced threat detection capabilities. Azure Sphere is noted for seamless integration, while Palo Alto Networks is valued for extensive device coverage.
Download Azure Sphere vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report
Azure Sphere has a competitive setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is generally considered more expensive. This cost difference highlights Azure Sphere as a more budget-friendly option in comparison to Palo Alto's premium pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Sphere has a competitive setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is generally considered more expensive. This cost difference highlights Azure Sphere as a more budget-friendly option in comparison to Palo Alto's premium pricing.
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Allot IoTSecure
3.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Allot IoTSecure
3.0 out of 5
Allot IoTSecure enhances network security with robust threat detection and seamless integration features. It efficiently protects connected devices yet leaves room for improved scalability and flexibility. Organizations rely on its ability to safeguard IoT networks while seeking advancements in customization and adaptability.
There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution. Additionally, there are installation costs.
View comparison
Pricing
There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution. Additionally, there are installation costs.

Related categories

IoT Security
Network Access Control (NAC)
Endpoint Compliance