Top 10 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Alternatives

Name: Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Brand: Palo Alto Networks
Rating: 4.2 (11 reviews)

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

11 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Forescout Platform, Nozomi Networks, and Armis. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security surpasses its competitors by offering advanced machine learning capabilities, integrated threat prevention, and automated policy recommendations, ensuring comprehensive device visibility and security for all IoT environments.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Forescout Platform

4.2 out of 5

Forescout Platform

4.2 out of 5

Forescout Platform provides extensive endpoint visibility and network access control, integrating well with third-party products. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security offers granular zero trust policies with next-generation firewall integration, though it may not address all security requirements independently.

Download Forescout Platform vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report

Pricing

Forescout Platform involves moderate initial setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is known for lower upfront costs, highlighting a key difference in pricing structures between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Nozomi Networks

4.5 out of 5

Nozomi Networks

4.5 out of 5

Nozomi Networks offers competitive pricing and excellent support with a focus on real-time analytics and anomaly detection, making it suitable for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks justifies its higher setup cost with comprehensive features, advanced threat prevention, and cloud integration.

Download Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report

Pricing

Nozomi Networks has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, highlighting the initial cost differences between the solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Nozomi Networks has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, highlighting the initial cost differences between the solutions.

Armis

4.3 out of 5

Armis

4.3 out of 5

Armis offers competitive pricing and intuitive deployment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with rapid ROI. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, with its advanced threat intelligence, requires a higher initial investment but provides robust features justifying long-term savings on security breaches.

Download Armis vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report

Pricing

Armis offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Palo Alto Networks IoT Security involves a more comprehensive setup process which may entail higher upfront expenses. The distinct setup approaches reflect differing priorities in integration simplicity versus extensiv...

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for IoT

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for IoT

3.7 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security appeals for its competitive pricing, ease of use, and quick deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for IoT offers seamless Azure integration and advanced analytics, justifying higher costs with its extensive feature set and comprehensive ecosystem benefits.

Download Microsoft Defender for IoT vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security often features higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, providing different value depending on the user's infrastructure requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security often features higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for IoT, providing different value depending on the user's infrastructure requirements.

Phosphorus Cybersecurity

1 out of 5

Phosphorus Cybersecurity

1 out of 5

Empowering enterprises to go beyond discovery to full xIoT visibility and remediation. Phosphorus fully automates the remediation of the biggest IoT, OT, and network device vulnerabilities—including unknown and inaccurate asset inventory, default device credentials, out-of-date device firmware, and out-of-date certificates.

View comparison

Azure Sphere

3.8 out of 5

Azure Sphere

3.8 out of 5

Azure Sphere offers robust, affordable IoT security focusing on end-to-end device protection. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security provides extensive feature sets with advanced threat detection capabilities. Azure Sphere is noted for seamless integration, while Palo Alto Networks is valued for extensive device coverage.

Download Azure Sphere vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report

Pricing

Azure Sphere has a competitive setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is generally considered more expensive. This cost difference highlights Azure Sphere as a more budget-friendly option in comparison to Palo Alto's premium pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Allot IoTSecure

3.0 out of 5

Allot IoTSecure

3.0 out of 5

Generate incremental revenue and differentiate your mobile IoT by offering security services. Network-based security addresses important concerns for all verticals, complementary to basic connectivity and other IoT services.

Pricing

There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution. Additionally, there are installation costs.

View comparison

Pricing

There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution. Additionally, there are installation costs.

Related categories

IoT Security

Network Access Control (NAC)

Endpoint Compliance