Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks

Ranking in IoT Security

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Ranking in IoT Security

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 12.0%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 5.9%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks	12.0%
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security	5.9%
Other	82.1%

IoT Security

Featured Reviews

Apurva Nigam

Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint

Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation

On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2774463

Manager ERP (Insurance) at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Have used it to manage device updates remotely and now see potential for improved centralized control

One of the favorite features is that they can plug in a device and update it without being on the network, so you can perform an offline update. If all the IoT devices in the field can provide a single pane of glass and management through that platform in a controlled fashion, that would be really beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Nozomi Networks is that it has built OT-oriented protocols such as OPC UA, DNP3, Modbus, and Siemens S7, and for these protocols, Nozomi Networks identifies them very perfectly."

"Nozomi Networks has the best AI-based detection and intrusion detection solution, as it is very robust, easy to deploy, and easy to use with a very user-friendly GUI and good support in terms of product and after-sales support."

"The most valuable features of Nozomi Networks are the visibility of OT protocols and the versatility in finding the details of the assets feeding the tool."

"The return on investment from Nozomi Networks is substantial, particularly concerning time saved."

"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."

"Nozomi Networks has positively impacted my organization by providing observability of the environment and the assets in the OT environment of the shop floor."

"It has impacted security operations in a better way."

"Nozomi Networks has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to build a roadmap based on what I see, ultimately leading to a better security posture, which includes knowing what is inside the network and what vulnerabilities exist."

More Nozomi Networks pros

"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules. It has also enabled us to create security policies. It is an easy solution to customise when it comes to creating templates and pulling reports."

"The stability is pretty good; it's a very solid solution, so if customers are looking for an IoT/OT solution, they should consider Palo Alto Networks IoT Security."

"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."

"It is simple to use. We just need to enable features and then configure IoT policies."

"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."

"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."

"Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs."

"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros

Cons

"The pricing was quite high based on the end customer's perspective."

"Regarding the functionality of Nozomi Networks, the query syntax is very complicated. The syntax of the queries is very complex, so sometimes you will not get what you want."

"I think Nozomi Networks can be improved by enhancing the size of the boxes and the performance for collecting logs, and of course, the price."

"I would like more customizable options for configurations."

"I would add that the documentation is lacking some information, so you need to ask customer support for it, but you cannot have everything."

"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."

"Nozomi Networks can be improved by integrating with other technologies so that teams look at a single dashboard when it comes to security issues."

"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."

More Nozomi Networks cons

"I had to call the support because there were some devices that were not showing up."

"It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates."

"The support is in line with Palo Alto Networks services for other products but needs improvement."

"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."

"More application signatures are required."

"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."

"It would be beneficial to have a more centralized and user-friendly platform that could consolidate all the necessary information, which proved challenging during the initial POC phase."

"Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's reporting capabilities are less comprehensive and robust than those provided by Cisco."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."

"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."

"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."

"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."

"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?

My experience with Nozomi Networks in terms of pricing and licensing is that it is generally a premium solution, not a standard one for all organizational needs. It is more than a typical premium s...

What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?

I see challenges with Nozomi Networks mainly as a detection or visibility tool, but it does not actively block traffic by design for safety reasons. If it detects any abnormalities, it suggests usi...

What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?

I primarily use Nozomi Networks for two main use cases in our environment: OT asset visibility and inventory management, as well as threat detection and anomaly monitoring, which is very important ...

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

Dragos vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Armis vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Zscaler Secure Your IoT and OT vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Nozomi Networks Competitors

Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 15% of the time

Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 10% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 9% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Product Reports

Nozomi Networks

Download Nozomi Networks product report

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Download Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report

Also Known As

SCADAguardian

No data available

Overview

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security enhances device classification and security through a cloud-based AI engine. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, supporting zero-trust policies and efficient network management.

Focused on securing on-premises and industrial control systems, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security utilizes AI-driven integration with Cortex Data Lake for automated security policy management. It aids endpoint security, IoT log monitoring, and regulatory compliance, offering centralized threat protection and vulnerability detection across diverse applications. Challenges include user-friendliness, scalability, and integration with infrastructure, but the service supports robust VPN capabilities and next-gen firewall technology.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Application Visibility: Offers deep insights into device operations.
Third-Party Integration: Enables seamless connections with existing systems.
Zero-Trust Policies: Implements granular security controls.
AI Device Classification: Utilizes cloud-based AI for advanced device management.
Cortex Data Lake: Enhances logging and threat management capabilities.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from using Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Comprehensive Management: Intuitive dashboard simplifies network oversight.
Offline Updates: Supports continued security even without direct cloud access.
Custom Policy Creation: Allows efficient security policy customization.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Offers robust defense across various environments.
VPN Capabilities: Provides secure connectivity in diverse scenarios.

In specific industries, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security serves as a critical tool for centralized network security in on-premises and operational technology environments. It is deployed for automated vulnerability detection and compliance across different applications, addressing regulatory and network security challenges for enterprises.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group

Information Not Available

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security