Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Nozomi and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Nozomi is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Nozomi holds a 15.4% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nozomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Nozomi Networks

Read 9 Nozomi Networks reviews

6,592 Views
1,846 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Read 11 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews

1,581 Views
1,581 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nozomi Networks

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Nozomi Networks and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security are competitors in the IoT security category, each with unique advantages. Nozomi Networks has favorable pricing and support, while Palo Alto Networks offers superior features that make it a better investment.

Features: Nozomi Networks focuses on network visibility and threat detection, including advanced network monitoring and asset management. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security offers advanced threat prevention, seamless integration with its other products, and enhanced analytics with machine learning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Nozomi Networks could improve by enhancing analytics and integration capabilities, expanding machine learning features, and refining user interface aesthetics. Palo Alto Networks might work on simplifying deployment processes, reducing complexity in feature configuration, and pricing adjustments for broader market reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nozomi Networks provides an easy deployment process with user-friendly guidance and responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks, though complex in setup, offers detailed deployment strategies and strong technical support for custom solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Nozomi Networks is seen as cost-effective with high ROI due to lower initial setup costs. Palo Alto Networks, despite a higher upfront cost, provides substantial ROI through long-term security benefits and reduced operational risks, justifying its pricing as a strategic investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks

Ranking in IoT Security

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Ranking in IoT Security

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 15.4%, down from 31.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 6.9%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks	15.4%
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security	6.9%
Other	77.7%

IoT Security

Featured Reviews

reviewer2803332

Country Sales Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Critical networks have gained real-time visibility and detect threats with intelligent monitoring

I would like to see improvements in Nozomi Networks, probably more AI-based integration and better native integration with SOC and SOAR platforms. I would like to see specific features included in the next releases of Nozomi Networks, such as improvements in threat intelligence. They have competition from Dragos, which I believe is better in threat intelligence. I do not have much of an answer about the key differences of Nozomi Networks in comparison to other cyber defense solutions because I only work with Nozomi Networks. However, I heard from the market that they might lack in threat intelligence compared to Dragos. Other than that, I see Nozomi Networks as the best platform for customers, easy to manage, deploy, and operate. The cons might be that they lack some threat intelligence features that Dragos offers.

Read full review

reviewer2774463

Manager ERP (Insurance) at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Have used it to manage device updates remotely and now see potential for improved centralized control

One of the favorite features is that they can plug in a device and update it without being on the network, so you can perform an offline update. If all the IoT devices in the field can provide a single pane of glass and management through that platform in a controlled fashion, that would be really beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."

"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."

"Nozomi Networks has the best AI-based detection and intrusion detection solution, as it is very robust, easy to deploy, and easy to use with a very user-friendly GUI and good support in terms of product and after-sales support."

"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."

"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."

"The most valuable features of Nozomi Networks are the visibility of OT protocols and the versatility in finding the details of the assets feeding the tool."

"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."

"It has impacted security operations in a better way."

More Nozomi Networks pros

"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."

"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."

"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."

"I would recommend Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to any organization with automation plants or standard enterprise IT environments."

"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."

"It is simple to use. We just need to enable features and then configure IoT policies."

"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules. It has also enabled us to create security policies. It is an easy solution to customise when it comes to creating templates and pulling reports."

"The stability is pretty good; it's a very solid solution, so if customers are looking for an IoT/OT solution, they should consider Palo Alto Networks IoT Security."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros

Cons

"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."

"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."

"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."

"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."

"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."

"We have faced downtimes, crashes, or performance issues with certain implementations."

"I would like more customizable options for configurations."

"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."

More Nozomi Networks cons

"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."

"The support is in line with Palo Alto Networks services for other products but needs improvement."

"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."

"Essentially, this solution focuses on data analysis and cannot perform any physical actions."

"I had to call the support because there were some devices that were not showing up."

"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."

"It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates."

"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."

"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."

"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."

"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."

"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?

Nozomi Networks is priced moderately. Its cost is not too expensive, but it is not low either.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?

We use Nozomi Networks as an intrusion detection system for OT deployments, automation systems, and IoT systems such as medical equipment to protect medical systems and smart meters. We detect any ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 28% of the time

Dragos vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 14% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 9% of the time

Armis vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Dragos Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Nozomi Networks Competitors

Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 15% of the time

Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 13% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IoT Security

February 2026

Download Nozomi Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

March 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report

Also Known As

SCADAguardian

No data available

Overview

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Introducing comprehensive IoT Security solutions tailored for enterprises, healthcare, and industrial operations. Safeguard every device, visible or unseen, with Zero Trust security protocols, ensuring protection against known and unknown threats. With rapid 15X faster deployment times, Enterprise IoT Security, Medical IoT Security, and Industrial OT Security streamline operations, allowing teams to prioritize security over setup. Seamlessly integrate with Palo Alto Networks ML-Powered NGFWs or Prisma Access for swift implementation, making your infrastructure IoT-aware within minutes. Eliminate blind spots across existing IT and security solutions with playbook-driven, built-in integrations, and simplify cloud delivery for deployment across any architecture without the need for multiple sensors or network redesign. Protect your assets and ensure uninterrupted operations with our comprehensive IoT security solutions.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

March 2026

Free Report: Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security report.

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.