Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Nozomi and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Nozomi is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Nozomi holds a 13.3% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nozomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Nozomi Networks

Read 11 Nozomi Networks reviews

6,820 Views
1,978 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Read 11 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews

1,665 Views
1,665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nozomi Networks

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Nozomi Networks and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security are competitors in the IoT security category, each with unique advantages. Nozomi Networks has favorable pricing and support, while Palo Alto Networks offers superior features that make it a better investment.

Features: Nozomi Networks focuses on network visibility and threat detection, including advanced network monitoring and asset management. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security offers advanced threat prevention, seamless integration with its other products, and enhanced analytics with machine learning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Nozomi Networks could improve by enhancing analytics and integration capabilities, expanding machine learning features, and refining user interface aesthetics. Palo Alto Networks might work on simplifying deployment processes, reducing complexity in feature configuration, and pricing adjustments for broader market reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nozomi Networks provides an easy deployment process with user-friendly guidance and responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks, though complex in setup, offers detailed deployment strategies and strong technical support for custom solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Nozomi Networks is seen as cost-effective with high ROI due to lower initial setup costs. Palo Alto Networks, despite a higher upfront cost, provides substantial ROI through long-term security benefits and reduced operational risks, justifying its pricing as a strategic investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,510 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks

Ranking in IoT Security

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Ranking in IoT Security

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 13.3%, down from 30.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 6.3%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks	13.3%
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security	6.3%
Other	80.4%

IoT Security

Featured Reviews

Apurva Nigam

Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint

Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation

On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2774463

Manager ERP (Insurance) at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Have used it to manage device updates remotely and now see potential for improved centralized control

One of the favorite features is that they can plug in a device and update it without being on the network, so you can perform an offline update. If all the IoT devices in the field can provide a single pane of glass and management through that platform in a controlled fashion, that would be really beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."

"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."

"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."

"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."

"It has impacted security operations in a better way."

"It brings visibility into the OT environment because most of the enterprises only have methods to check their IT environment."

"The best feature of Nozomi Networks is that it has built OT-oriented protocols such as OPC UA, DNP3, Modbus, and Siemens S7, and for these protocols, Nozomi Networks identifies them very perfectly."

"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."

More Nozomi Networks pros

"Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs."

"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."

"I would recommend Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to any organization with automation plants or standard enterprise IT environments."

"The stability is pretty good; it's a very solid solution, so if customers are looking for an IoT/OT solution, they should consider Palo Alto Networks IoT Security."

"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."

"From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements."

"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."

"The key strength of Palo Alto firewalls lies in their application-based approach, offering a much finer level of control compared to traditional firewalls."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros

Cons

"I would like more customizable options for configurations."

"The solution should include an integration library."

"On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved."

"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."

"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."

"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."

"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."

"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."

More Nozomi Networks cons

"I had to call the support because there were some devices that were not showing up."

"While not overly complex, its usability could be enhanced, making it a more intuitive experience for everyone."

"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."

"Essentially, this solution focuses on data analysis and cannot perform any physical actions."

"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."

"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."

"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week."

"More application signatures are required."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."

"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."

"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."

"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."

"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."

"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?

Nozomi Networks and Claroty are on the expensive end of the market, so the client should have those budgets available.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?

The potential area of improvement I see for Nozomi Networks is that there are many unknown malwares that cannot be identified because they are not updated in the National Vulnerability Database. Th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?

My main use case for Nozomi Networks is that I have experience with implementation, designing, and configuration.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 25% of the time

Dragos vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Armis vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Zscaler Secure Your IoT and OT vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Nozomi Networks Competitors

Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 15% of the time

Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 12% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks

May 2026

Download Nozomi Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

May 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report

Also Known As

SCADAguardian

No data available

Overview

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security enhances device classification and security through a cloud-based AI engine. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, supporting zero-trust policies and efficient network management.

Focused on securing on-premises and industrial control systems, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security utilizes AI-driven integration with Cortex Data Lake for automated security policy management. It aids endpoint security, IoT log monitoring, and regulatory compliance, offering centralized threat protection and vulnerability detection across diverse applications. Challenges include user-friendliness, scalability, and integration with infrastructure, but the service supports robust VPN capabilities and next-gen firewall technology.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Application Visibility: Offers deep insights into device operations.
Third-Party Integration: Enables seamless connections with existing systems.
Zero-Trust Policies: Implements granular security controls.
AI Device Classification: Utilizes cloud-based AI for advanced device management.
Cortex Data Lake: Enhances logging and threat management capabilities.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from using Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Comprehensive Management: Intuitive dashboard simplifies network oversight.
Offline Updates: Supports continued security even without direct cloud access.
Custom Policy Creation: Allows efficient security policy customization.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Offers robust defense across various environments.
VPN Capabilities: Provides secure connectivity in diverse scenarios.

In specific industries, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security serves as a critical tool for centralized network security in on-premises and operational technology environments. It is deployed for automated vulnerability detection and compliance across different applications, addressing regulatory and network security challenges for enterprises.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

April 2026

Free Report: Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security report.

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.