Parasoft SOAtest vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

Parasoft and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while SmartBear is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. Parasoft holds a 0.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to SmartBear’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

346 Views
207 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 76 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

4,118 Views
3,060 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

SmartBear TestComplete

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and SmartBear TestComplete compete in the test automation software category. SOAtest holds an advantage in API testing capabilities, while TestComplete is more versatile for application testing.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers strong API testing support, including multiple protocol compatibility and comprehensive test automation. It provides extensive scripting and data-driven testing options, and integrates effectively with source control tools. SmartBear TestComplete provides automation features for desktop, mobile, and web applications, exceptional object recognition, and cross-platform support.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest needs a more user-friendly interface, better report functionalities, and improved UI testing. It also lacks seamless integration with some management tools. SmartBear TestComplete faces challenges with complex web and mobile testing setup, significant manual intervention, and a complicated, costly licensing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is flexible with on-premises or hybrid cloud deployment options and offers effective customer service, though support varies by region. SmartBear TestComplete supports on-premises and cloud deployments, providing robust technical support with room for improvement with modern DevOps tool integration.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is positioned as a high-end market option with substantial capabilities but high licensing costs which may be prohibitive for smaller teams. SmartBear TestComplete offers a modular pricing structure which may be more affordable for diverse needs, although recent changes to its pricing model have drawn criticism. Both solutions generally deliver positive ROI, with TestComplete often viewed as more cost-effective.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (28th), API Testing Tools (11th)

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 5.9%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to integrate with Azure DevOps for continuous integration and deployment."

"The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find."

"The ease-of-use and quality of the overall product are above average."

"Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution."

"TestComplete is simple, it's a very easy-to-use tool."

"In TestComplete, I saw a conformed package of a tool that kept everybody in consistency. The team was able to regenerate further tests without having to manipulate more code because the record feature is great."

"SmartBear TestComplete performs some self-healing and has a feature called OCR (optical character recognition)."

"The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

Cons

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing."

"Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage."

"It is very hard to read the test log generated by TestComplete Executor if the log file is very big. TestComplete Executor is a small tool for just running the TestComplete test framework (not for developing)."

"Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work."

"The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation."

"We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses."

"The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex."

"Error handling features in the tool are a little limited."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it."

"This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team."

"Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."

"The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."

"The solution's pricing is too high."

"The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."

"TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module."

"Overall, for us, the cost of the TestComplete platform and the three extra modules is around $8,000."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for automotive compliance and sanity-checking scores.

See all answers

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I don't know much about the pricing, however, I think it's cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

The recording function, when using Python, could be improved, as it does not work well in recording testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 22% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 20% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 14% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 23% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

Qt Squish vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

March 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

March 2025

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

What is SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.

TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.

TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:

Desktop: Users can easily and quickly automate UI tests using today’s most popular desktop applications, such as; Windows, Java, Python,.Net, VBScript, and more.
Web: Users can effortlessly create renewable tests for all of today’s popular web applications, including JavaScript frameworks on 2000+ trusted browser and platform integrations.
Mobile: Users can safely build and automate serviceable UI tests on actual or virtual android or IOS devices, locally or in the cloud. Users can create code or codeless tests. TestComplete seamlessly integrates with many of today’s popular frameworks.

Key Features

Easily create automated UI tests: TestComplete offers scriptless Record and Replay or simple keyword-driven tests to quickly develop any type of UI test users may require. Tests can be recorded once, then replayed when needed across various applications on mobile, web, or desktop environments. TestComplete integrates with many different languages, such as Java, Python, C+, and more.
Keyword driven tests: Users can easily divide testing steps, actions, objects, and data with an integrated keyword-driven test structure. This makes it easy for every user to participate in the test automation process; there is no programming experience needed. Everything is made simple with easy-to-use point-and-click options.
Data driven tests: Easily distinguish data from test commands to keep administrative efforts simple. Users can improve overall coverage by running various automated mobile, desktop, or web UI tests.
Record and Replay: Users can reuse created automated tests across every environment as often as desired. This helps to expand overall test coverage and represents a huge cost and time savings.

Reviews from Real Users

Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”

Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete

February 2025

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.