Planview Daptiv vs Sciforma comparison

Planview and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview is ranked #14, while Sciforma is ranked #12. Planview holds a 3.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

2,123 Views
934 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

2,166 Views
1,018 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Sciforma and Planview Daptiv are competing in the project portfolio management space. While Sciforma excels in pricing and support, Planview Daptiv offers superior features which might justify a higher investment.

Features: Sciforma offers resource management, project scheduling, and time tracking. Planview Daptiv is known for its portfolio management and detailed reporting tools. Planview Daptiv's feature set may provide more strategic value for complex projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sciforma is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, enabling a smooth transition. Planview Daptiv provides a flexible deployment model but might involve a more comprehensive onboarding process.

Pricing and ROI: Sciforma presents a competitive setup cost and a promising ROI due to its strong support and affordability. Planview Daptiv involves a higher initial cost, justified by features that may lead to significant long-term ROI for resource-heavy projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sciforma	3.9%
Planview Daptiv	3.2%
Other	92.9%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

More Planview Daptiv pros

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"ONE2TEAM revolutionizes the way of working: The cloud based solution for project and portfolio management with very strong collaboration functionality lets executives and team members access their work environment anytime, anywhere to monitor program status, act, and complete a personalized checklist of tasks without the need to send emails or create presentations, simply working together in a dashboard."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

Cons

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

More Planview Daptiv cons

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Construction Company

13%

Insurance Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 12% of the time

Bicore FLIGHTMAP vs Sciforma

Compared 6% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

June 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

June 2026

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

No data available

One2team

Overview

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Sciforma is a comprehensive project portfolio management tool designed to streamline complex workflows and improve team collaboration, ideal for businesses seeking efficient project execution.

Sciforma facilitates project management by offering a robust platform that integrates planning, tracking, and resource management. It supports businesses in achieving operational efficiency through its customizable structure, flexible reporting, and scalable solutions. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for teams to adopt and integrate into daily operations, ensuring that project objectives align with business goals. Sciforma's flexibility and feature set make it a strategic choice for improving project delivery and enhancing decision-making.

What are the most valuable features of Sciforma?

Resource Management: Dynamic tools to allocate and optimize resources effectively
Project Tracking: Comprehensive tracking capabilities for real-time project insights
Customization: Tailored solutions to fit specific business processes
Reporting: Detailed reports to support business intelligence and decision-making

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Sciforma?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines project processes leading to increased productivity
Cost Management: Better budget control with real-time financial tracking
Scalability: Adapts to business growth and evolving project requirements
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through integrated communication tools

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and construction, Sciforma is implemented to address specific demands like regulatory compliance, financial planning, and milestone tracking. These industries benefit from Sciforma's ability to deliver tailored processes that meet their unique challenges, helping them achieve strategic objectives while maintaining operational efficiency. Sciforma's adaptability ensures it addresses industry-specific project management needs efficiently, making it a preferred tool for experts.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma

June 2026

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.