Ruckus Cloudpath and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform compete in network security. Based on feature robustness, ThreatLocker seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced application control and competitive pricing, enhancing its value for smaller organizations.
Features: Ruckus Cloudpath provides robust network security features, including powerful encryption and multi-factor authentication. It also excels in guest access management and integrates with systems like Eduroam. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers superior application control, using advanced allowlisting and ring-fencing to prevent unauthorized software. Additionally, its elevation control streamlines security management and provides thorough audit logs.
Room for Improvement: Ruckus Cloudpath can enhance mobile device management and simplify deployment. It also needs better automation and enriched API features, while cost is a concern. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform can improve on integrating human identity features and SIEM tools. Its Web Control and usability for new engineers could also be enhanced.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ruckus Cloudpath is deployable in on-premises, private cloud, and hybrid environments, with local technical support. However, company commitment is occasionally questioned. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers versatile deployment in public and private clouds, complemented by responsive technical support and integration assistance. Some users request more comprehensive training options.
Pricing and ROI: Ruckus Cloudpath's pricing is considered high, with variable ROI linked to organizational size, favoring large educational institutions. In contrast, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is praised for competitive and flexible pricing. It is noted for affordability in setup and licensing, with pricing including ample support and onboarding, offering excellent value for smaller organizations needing cost-effective security solutions.
For a big organization, there is a high level of ROI with Ruckus Cloudpath, but when it comes to smaller organizations, it yields less ROI as it takes some time because it's not cheap, and there are customers for whom it isn't a great fit.
With on-premises and cloud options, certain scenarios make cloud more expensive while on-premises becomes cheaper.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
We have been using their products for more than ten years, and I have direct access to the Ruckus Turkey manager and also the Middle East region manager, Mr. Olivia.
Ruckus customer service is very good and helpful.
I would rate the technical support from Ruckus as eight out of ten.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
Ruckus Cloudpath is a scalable service, and I would rate its scalability as eight on a scale of one to ten.
Ruckus Cloudpath is a scalable product.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
Ruckus Cloudpath is very stable.
I would rate the stability as nine out of ten.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
I would like to improve the automation aspect, ensuring that if any issues arise or alerts are detected, the cloud platform can respond and troubleshoot more effectively.
There is room for improvement in deployment.
The user interface of Ruckus Cloudpath needs some enhancement along with the support process, requiring more qualified engineers to support this product.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath is on the expensive side.
Ruckus Cloudpath is a bit above medium in terms of pricing.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
The solution provides powerful encryption, a secure wireless network connection through WPA enterprise connection, and advanced security tools.
The MMS portion is the best feature in Ruckus Cloudpath, as they can monitor the entire network intelligently with AI features that simplify the troubleshooting processes.
The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform | 2.6% |
| Ruckus Cloudpath | 2.3% |
| Other | 95.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 73 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
Ruckus Cloudpath offers robust authentication and seamless device onboarding for network management, popular among educational institutions and hospitality industries for secure access and smooth integration.
Ruckus Cloudpath provides comprehensive network management with features like certificate-based security, dynamic user tracking, and seamless integration capabilities. Its AI-driven management improves network oversight, while user-based licensing adds flexibility. However, it faces challenges like high pricing, complex deployment, and scalability issues, needing enhancements in mobile device management and multi-vendor integration. Hospitality and educational sectors benefit significantly from its user-friendly guest access and infrastructure integration.
What valuable features does Ruckus Cloudpath offer?Educational institutions utilize Ruckus Cloudpath for onboarding staff and students efficiently, ensuring secure Wi-Fi access through integration with Active Directory. Hospitality industries use it for seamless guest access and infrastructure integration. Retail and corporate environments rely on it for comprehensive Wi-Fi coverage, access control, and API management, particularly in educational settings.
Gain proactive, industry leading Zero Trust cybersecurity capabilities with ThreatLocker. By employing a deny-by-default approach, you will greatly enhance your security and operational efficiency. Solutions from ThreatLocker are focused on precise application control and
streamlined access management without administrative rights.
ThreatLocker Application Control solutions include Zero Trust Alllowlisting, Zero Trust Ringfencing and Privilege Access Management, significantly reducing any unauthorized software activities in your environment. Granular controls improve your overall security, while ringfencing enhances application behavior monitoring. Elevation requests will allow users to gain administrative access without IT intervention. The platform's ease of policy management and real-time threat visibility contribute to reduced help desk tickets and operational costs, ensuring protection against ransomware and
unauthorized applications.
What are the key features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
Organizations often deploy ThreatLocker to ensure endpoint security in industries requiring stringent application control and administrative access management. Its functionalities are critical for managing Shadow IT, creating policies, and overseeing software installation approvals. Common usage spans sectors demanding robust security and compliance, such as finance and healthcare, where maintaining high
security and efficiency is crucial.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
