Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo

Top 10 Ruckus Cloudpath Alternatives

Vendor: Ruckus
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Ruckus Cloudpath based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Aruba ClearPass, and Fortinet FortiNAC. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Ruckus Cloudpath surpasses its competitors by offering seamless network access, robust security protocols, and an intuitive user interface that simplifies management, ensuring a superior and secure connectivity experience for enterprises and educational institutions.

Ruckus Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Ruckus, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
4.1 out of 5
Cisco ISE integrates seamlessly with other Cisco technologies, ideal for comprehensive security environments. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath offers easy user onboarding and flexible deployment. ISE caters to Cisco-centric setups, while Cloudpath benefits those seeking diverse user management with simple installation and pricing.
Download Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) has a higher setup cost compared to Ruckus Cloudpath, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. However, each solution's setup process and cost reflect its respective feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) has a higher setup cost compared to Ruckus Cloudpath, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. However, each solution's setup process and cost reflect its respective feature set.
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
Aruba ClearPass offers comprehensive NAC solutions with integration capabilities, making it ideal for complex networks. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath provides streamlined security with user-based licensing, suitable for environments needing efficient onboarding and moderate deployment costs.
Download Aruba ClearPass vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report
Aruba ClearPass generally has higher setup costs compared to Ruckus Cloudpath, which often results in lower setup expenses. Each product presents a distinct pricing structure that can significantly impact budget considerations for network management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Aruba ClearPass generally has higher setup costs compared to Ruckus Cloudpath, which often results in lower setup expenses. Each product presents a distinct pricing structure that can significantly impact budget considerations for network management solutions.
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.9 out of 5
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiNAC delivers network access control with endpoint compliance and IoT visibility but could be challenging to integrate and expensive. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath focuses on user experience and onboarding ease, though it faces compatibility issues with multi-vendor environments and scalability challenges.
Download Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report
Fortinet FortiNAC has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Ruckus Cloudpath, highlighting a distinct difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiNAC has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Ruckus Cloudpath, highlighting a distinct difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Portnox
4.0 out of 5
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Portnox
4.0 out of 5
Portnox simplifies network access with easy onboarding and quick deployment, appealing to fast-paced environments. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath offers advanced security features and detailed customization, suitable for organizations seeking comprehensive network security at a higher cost. Portnox attracts budget-conscious buyers; Ruckus caters to feature-prioritizing businesses.
Download Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report
Portnox has a straightforward and low-cost setup, while Ruckus Cloudpath involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment. These differences in setup costs may impact decision-making.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox has a straightforward and low-cost setup, while Ruckus Cloudpath involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment. These differences in setup costs may impact decision-making.
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
macmon Network Access Control
4.3 out of 5
Macmon Network Access Control provides robust segmentation and visibility for strong protection, emphasizing ease of integration. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath offers flexible onboarding and policy management, catering to scalable needs. Macmon suits cost-conscious buyers, while Ruckus Cloudpath fits those seeking comprehensive features despite higher cost.
Download Ruckus Cloudpath vs. macmon Network Access Control Report
Macmon Network Access Control offers competitive setup costs, while Ruckus Cloudpath provides a more premium setup experience, highlighting the distinct pricing strategies of each network solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Macmon Network Access Control offers competitive setup costs, while Ruckus Cloudpath provides a more premium setup experience, highlighting the distinct pricing strategies of each network solution.
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
Sophos Network Access Control
4.2 out of 5
Sophos Network Access Control excels in integration and scalability, ideal for large networks. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath stands out with superior policy management and onboarding features. Sophos appeals with straightforward deployment and affordability, while Ruckus justifies higher costs with cloud scalability and long-term savings.
Download Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report
Sophos Network Access Control's setup cost is generally perceived as high, while Ruckus Cloudpath tends to offer a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront pricing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Network Access Control's setup cost is generally perceived as high, while Ruckus Cloudpath tends to offer a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront pricing between the two solutions.
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
ExtremeControl
3.9 out of 5
Ruckus Cloudpath Logo
ExtremeControl
3.9 out of 5
ExtremeControl offers extensive customization and integration, attracting entities needing in-depth traffic analysis. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath appeals to those prioritizing secure authentication protocols. ExtremeControl's comprehensive approach suits larger infrastructures, while Cloudpath's simple, cloud-based setup benefits those seeking efficient deployment.
Download ExtremeControl vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report
ExtremeControl involves significant upfront costs with a focus on robust network management, whereas Ruckus Cloudpath provides an affordable initial setup, prioritizing ease of access and cloud integration.
View comparison
Pricing
ExtremeControl involves significant upfront costs with a focus on robust network management, whereas Ruckus Cloudpath provides an affordable initial setup, prioritizing ease of access and cloud integration.

Related categories

Network Access Control (NAC)
Cisco Security Portfolio
ZTNA