SAP IQ vs Tibero comparison

SAP and TmaxSoft are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. SAP is ranked #24 with an average rating of 6.8, while TmaxSoft is ranked #28. SAP holds a 1.5% mindshare in SQL, compared to TmaxSoft’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TmaxSoft users who would recommend it.

SAP IQ

Read 23 SAP IQ reviews

1,362 Views
640 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Tibero

Read 4 Tibero reviews

783 Views
775 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP IQ

Tibero

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP IQ and Tibero compete in database management, each with unique strengths. SAP IQ is superior in analytical performance due to its advanced in-memory analytics, while Tibero offers robust security and compatibility, making it ideal for businesses requiring strong security features.

Features: SAP IQ features a columnar storage system, high-speed querying, and impressive data compression capabilities. Tibero is known for its strong Oracle database compatibility, hyper-threading architecture, and advanced cluster support.

Room for Improvement: SAP IQ could enhance its cross-platform capabilities and offer better security features. Improving ease of use and user interface would also be beneficial. Tibero could improve its analytical performance and scalability. It might also benefit from offering more extensive documentation and better integration with non-Oracle platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP IQ offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive documentation, leveraging its integration with SAP tools for a seamless experience. Tibero provides flexible deployment options and offers tailored customer service, making it a better choice for enterprises with complex needs.

Pricing and ROI: SAP IQ requires a higher initial investment but offers significant ROI due to its advanced analytics features. Tibero's flexible pricing model can result in cost savings, especially for Oracle-compatible deployments, making it a financially viable choice for businesses prioritizing compatibility and security.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP IQ vs. Tibero Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP IQ vs. Tibero

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP IQ

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (15th)

Tibero

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of SAP IQ is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tibero is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP IQ	1.5%
Tibero	2.1%
Other	96.4%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Narayanan

Tech Lead, Database Section. at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Compression performance gets high marks but user-friendly interface needs improvement

The downside of SAP IQ, from what I understood from the management side, is that the front end for the DBA, for the admin, is not that user-friendly. If you compare it with SQL Server Management Studio, it is not that user-friendly GUI for the admin. But the engine is very strong and powerful. It is easy to deploy SAP IQ; the implementation and installation are easy. The downside I see is that it doesn't allow most integrated backups; many of the marketplace players such as NetBackup, those software integrated backups are not available. So, if you want to take a backup, you need to take it locally, and then only you can back it up to any storage or anything. Those features such as integrated backup, which would allow it to stripe into an appliance or something similar, are not present. One thing I notice as a downside is that if the CPU utilization is very high, there is no direct way we can find out which query is taking the most CPU. In any other RDBMS, there are DMVs available to find out which query is taking most of the CPU, but those features are not present in SAP IQ. If our CPU is hitting at 100%, it is not easy to identify which connection is taking the most CPU.

Read full review

Cheul Jin-Lee

Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC

A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle

We are a solution provider and Tibero is one of the database products that we implement for our customers. All applications for Oracle work with Tibero and don't need to be customized The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database. If you have knowledge of Oracle then you…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The primary benefit of SAP IQ is its ability to limit the expansion of the costly SAP HANA database, which has limited storage capacity. This necessitates a form of data management that involves moving data from SAP HANA to SAP NLS, which is essentially archiving. This allows us to retain access to the data via a link whenever it is required."

"All data is compressed and indexed, allowing for fast execution of transactions."

"It is very robust for ad hoc DW queries and its columnar compression is unique and valuable."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The product is easy to learn."

"The column-based technologies (basically all the database for ITP) are used for SAP IQ. It is used as a column-based solution."

"SAP IQ is actually quite effective when it comes to scalability; we have a setup that's built with multiple servers involved and that seems to be working fairly efficiently, and if we wanted to add more servers into this entire setup, that would be fairly easy."

"Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database."

More SAP IQ pros

"Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast."

"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."

"Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc."

"Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."

Cons

"The primary negative aspect is the cost, which can be a challenge due to the economic conditions in Peru."

"Multiplex is very problematic. There are consistency problems in the metadata, meaning it is possible to lose metadata consistency. You should make sure you have healthy backups."

"The tool gets stuck sometimes."

"There is very little documentation available."

"Concurrency and functional error messaging."

"The downside I see is that it doesn't allow most integrated backups; many of the marketplace players such as NetBackup or Veritas, those software integrated backups are not available."

"The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future."

"I think the universe should be part of the Sybase IQ tool set."

More SAP IQ cons

"In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."

"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Evaluate all options; check to see if you need expensive add-ons."

"Negotiate based on the features required."

"The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades."

"It's not that costly. So, the pricing is cheap."

"The cost of implementation is about $3,000."

"Negotiation is very important."

"The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle."

"The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

36%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

17%

Logistics Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP IQ?

IQ implementation costs about three thousand dollars. It's less expensive compared to alternatives like Teradata Base in terms of transactional efficiency.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP IQ?

When it comes to SAP IQ, the areas that could be improved or enhanced include the error messaging and the locking capabilities, as that's where we often encounter problems. When there is an issue, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP IQ?

Our usual use cases for SAP IQ is that we have a Software-as-a-Service architecture where this database is the foundation for our SAP BusinessObjects platform. This is where it's getting its data f...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SQL Server vs SAP IQ

Compared 12% of the time

SAP HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 9% of the time

Snowflake vs SAP IQ

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database vs SAP IQ

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs SAP IQ

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP IQ Competitors

Oracle Database vs Tibero

Compared 69% of the time

Altibase vs Tibero

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Database In-Memory vs Tibero

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs Tibero

Compared 5% of the time

SAP HANA vs Tibero

Compared 5% of the time

More Tibero Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP IQ

January 2026

Download SAP IQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

January 2026

Download Tibero product report

Also Known As

Sybase IQ

No data available

Overview

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

SAP

Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

TmaxSoft

Sample Customers

ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.

NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions

Buyer's Guide

SAP IQ vs. Tibero

December 2025

Free Report: SAP IQ vs. Tibero

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP IQ vs. Tibero and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP IQ vs. Tibero report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.