SAP Signavio Process Manager vs TIBCO Nimbus Control comparison

"The most valuable feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager is the ability to do business process models."

"This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement."

"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."

"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."

"For the collaboration functions, we use the commenting and quick model functions for process owners who don't have specific knowledge about Process Manager."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."

"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."

"It helps clients find information when they need to know how to do their jobs effectively."

"It tends to get more engagement from people across the business."

"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."

"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."

"There is a lot of room for improvement. We've submitted a lot of OSS requests for special inputs we need, like glossary or dictionary entries in Quick Model. Currently, that's not functional."

"The solution is complex."

"Its reporting feature could have customization options."

"I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed."

"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."

"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."

"This product could probably do with less features rather than more. It is overly complicated. In recent releases, it has become harder to use."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"I found the pricing of the solution to be moderate compared to other choices."

"We are using the free trial version."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."