SecureWorks Taegis VDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

"I chose SecureWorks Taegis VDR because I trust SecureWorks, having worked with McAfee, Symantec, Trend Micro, Kaspersky, Carbon Black, Cylance, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Cortex XDR, and more, and I would say SecureWorks Taegis VDR is outstanding among all the other vendors in terms of functionality, ease of access, and UI friendliness."

"It is a one-stop solution for different needs with separate APIs. The product offers different solutions for different companies."

"SecureWorks Taegis VDR's best features include unified detection and response, as it pulls in alerts and logs from all my different tools such as EDR, SIEM, firewall, cloud services, and Windows machines, collecting everything into one clean dashboard where I can view all these items and eliminate the need to hunt through ten dashboards to piece a threat together."

"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."

"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."

"Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

"The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten."

"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."

"There is always room for improvement in SecureWorks Taegis VDR, especially regarding user interface and navigation, as the platform is powerful but the UI can feel complex for new users."

"I would like to improve SecureWorks Taegis VDR by enhancing the dashboard to provide a holistic view with granular data."

"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."

"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"

"t needs additional reporting and intelligence features, as well as enhancements in AI-driven detection, which is still in its early stages."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."

"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."

"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."