SharePoint vs Workplace by Facebook comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Microsoft and Meta solutions aren't in the same category. Microsoft is ranked #1 in ECM , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 11.8% mindshare in the category. Meta is ranked #7 in ESS , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 79% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Meta users who would recommend it.

SharePoint

Read 166 SharePoint reviews

21,303 Views
12,143 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Workplace by Facebook

Read 5 Workplace by Facebook reviews

1,190 Views
940 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Workplace by Facebook

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SharePoint and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SharePoint

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

166

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (1st), Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Workplace by Facebook

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. SharePoint is designed for Enterprise Content Management and holds a mindshare of 11.8%, down 14.7% compared to last year.
Workplace by Facebook, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Social Software, holds 2.8% mindshare, down 2.9% since last year.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	11.8%
OpenText Documentum Content Management	6.7%
Alfresco	5.9%
Other	75.6%

Enterprise Content Management

Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Workplace by Facebook	2.8%
Slack Business - Enterprise	10.5%
Microsoft Teams	7.2%
Other	79.5%

Enterprise Social Software

Featured Reviews

AnjneyBhardwaj

Senior Market Research Analyst at IDC Corporate

Collaboration has improved through simplified document access and controlled sharing

SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data. The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner. The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable. Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.

Read full review

Aryan Singh1

Product Manager at Infozion

Offers good integration features but needs to offer more flexibility in the language option offered

There are a couple of things that can be improved in the tool. When we are talking about communications, the tool has interoperable cataloging. The only thing that needs a certain level of improvement within Meta is the vernacular, which can be dependent, as we cannot choose the process of communication that is happening in it. After I launch a bot, if I move from one country to another, and if the entire communication is happening in German, while I have just moved from France, and I need to buy a particular choice of vehicle, then I would want the entire communication to happen in my language. What Meta does not allow as of now is that if I am reaching out to you in French, then only you can have the conversation in French. You cannot select a language in the middle of a conversation. If I want to have a conversation in French, there is a very limited selection. Until and unless a conversation is triggered from a particular language, we do not have the option to choose another language. The tool gives you flexibility in the language, but that is on the business and not on the customer, which sometimes limits the approachability aspect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For a medium to large scale business, it is excellent."

"It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint."

"For us, in terms of the project development and support tools and for a collaborative repository of live documents, there is nothing like this solution."

"For simple solutions, I recommend this solution."

"SharePoint is easy to collaborate with."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."

"SharePoint is better than Google Pages due to the maturity of the content I can create, the way I can store assets, and the way I can consume them."

"For enterprise global collaboration, DMS, and ECM needs, this is the right platform."

More SharePoint pros

"The product was easy to use."

"The biggest lesson we have learned from working with Workplace is that we should have made the change a lot earlier."

"The tool's integration feature benefited the workflow...it helped centralize communication."

"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."

"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."

"Storage is the best thing about the solution."

Cons

"Technical support was not as good as expected. Sometimes request took upwards of three business days."

"It does too many things and some of them seem impossible to set up."

"The initial setup process is not intuitive."

"The technical support process should be more streamlined as it usually involves contacting vendors and arranging calls for resolution."

"The technical support level is practically nil."

"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."

"The editing tools are still not up to par with all the existing hi-tech and GUI editing tools."

"Mobile rendering is not up to the mark."

More SharePoint cons

"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."

"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."

"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."

"What Meta does not allow as of now is that if I am reaching out to you in French, then only you can have the conversation in French. You cannot select a language in the middle of a conversation."

"The implementation could be made easier."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The pricing is competitive."

"We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."

"The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."

"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

"They are about an eight in comparison to other similar products."

"It is very expensive."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

"The solution seemed expensive to me."

"The cost has become one-tenth of the cost in comparison to the old techniques. As we were able to qualify and nurture these leads, the overall cost of the entire sales process was reduced."

"The regular package costs us $4 per user per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	84

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

I don't know how SharePoint can be improved because it works effectively, so I can't think of any improvement. It exists in the background, similar to Windows, where you don't think about it, but i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

I have been using SharePoint for three years since I began employment at Wartsila. My main use case for SharePoint is storing documents, meeting recordings, and visiting websites created by my coll...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workplace by Facebook?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workplace by Facebook?

I use the solution in my company to create chatbots for our clients, like BMW in India. We have been working on WhatsApp chatbots and Facebook marketing, where we have integrated Adobe Marketo for ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workplace by Facebook?

In our company, we integrate with Workplace through Facebook's tools that were provided to us, and it is there that we created a middleware system for communication back and forth. Whatever data we...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 16% of the time

Atlassian Confluence vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Slack Business - Enterprise vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 20% of the time

Atlassian Confluence vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 9% of the time

Yammer vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 9% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 8% of the time

Chatter vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 5% of the time

More Workplace by Facebook Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

August 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Social Software

September 2026

Download Workplace by Facebook product report

Also Known As

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Facebook Workplace, Facebook at Work

Overview

SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.

SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.

What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?

Document Management: Organize and manage documents efficiently.
Collaboration Tools: Enhance team collaboration and communication.
Microsoft Office Integration: Seamlessly work with Office applications.
Search Capabilities: Robust search and metadata tagging for easy retrieval.
Access Control: Protect and manage sensitive information access.
Power Platform Integration: Quick data handling and automation for improved productivity.

What Benefits Should Users Look for When Evaluating SharePoint?

Improved Team Efficiency: Enhance coordination and document sharing.
Centralized Storage: Efficient content management in a centralized repository.
Seamless Workflow Automation: Automate processes to boost productivity.
Integration Capability: Enhance functionality with external services and applications.
Customization Options: Tailor workflows and user experience to business needs.

In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.

Microsoft

Workplace by Facebook offers intuitive communication and collaboration tools for businesses, making it easy to manage conversations and projects while providing seamless integration with existing systems.

Designed for corporate communication, Workplace by Facebook features a Facebook-like interface for easy adoption. It supports storage and retrieval of past conversations and project files. While lacking direct API access, it integrates with systems like Microsoft Dynamics and Adobe Marketo through business service providers. However, it faces challenges in multi-party conferencing and language selection flexibility. An overwhelming number of groups and lack of task automation are noted concerns. Despite these, it remains popular for internal communication, HR collaboration, and client interactions utilizing Meta facilities.

What are the key features of Workplace by Facebook?

Familiar Interface: Ease of use with a design similar to Facebook.
Storage Capabilities: Efficiently stores and retrieves past conversations.
Knowledge Library: Centralized information-sharing platform.
Collaboration Tools: Posting, groups, and surveys enhance teamwork.
Integration: Compatible with systems like Microsoft Dynamics and Adobe Marketo.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Easy Adoption: Familiar interface speeds up onboarding.
Enhanced Collaboration: Tools that promote team engagement.
Flexible Integration: Adapts to legacy systems via providers.
Efficient Communication: Supports internal updates and HR tasks.

Workplace by Facebook is actively used in corporate settings for managing internal communication and project tracking. Businesses incorporate workplace software for announcements, executive blogs, and HR collaboration, often integrating it with marketing tools like WhatsApp and Adobe Marketo to improve client interaction networks.

Sample Customers

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Royal Bank of Scotland, UST Global, DNB Bank, Smart, IJM Corporation, Telenor Group, Mobilink, Landmark Group, Yes Bank, BrightTALK, Kenshoo, Godrej Consumer Products

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.