SharePoint vs Workplace by Facebook comparison

The compared Microsoft and Meta solutions aren't in the same category. Microsoft is ranked #1 in ECM , with an average rating of 8.1, and holds a 11.6% mindshare in the category. Meta is ranked #7 in ESS , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 79% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Meta users who would recommend it.

SharePoint

Read 164 SharePoint reviews

10,950 Views
6,023 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Workplace by Facebook

Read 5 Workplace by Facebook reviews

534 Views
454 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Workplace by Facebook

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SharePoint and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SharePoint

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

164

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (1st), Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Workplace by Facebook

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. SharePoint is designed for Enterprise Content Management and holds a mindshare of 11.6%, down 16.9% compared to last year.
Workplace by Facebook, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Social Software, holds 3.3% mindshare, down 3.7% since last year.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePoint	11.6%
OpenText Content Management	8.0%
Alfresco	7.6%
Other	72.8%

Enterprise Content Management

Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Workplace by Facebook	3.3%
Slack Business - Enterprise	11.2%
Microsoft Teams	8.4%
Other	77.1%

Enterprise Social Software

Featured Reviews

AnjneyBhardwaj

Senior Market Research Analyst at IDC Corporate

Collaboration has improved through simplified document access and controlled sharing

SharePoint is definitely used to keep a record of our files and data. The capability is quite good because it is time-saving. I have used it only four or five times, but it has been very helpful to keep all my information in a consolidated manner. The search feature is one of the most beneficial factors that we use to filter out the latest data or the latest file as per our convenience and use case. When you have a large repository, this feature is particularly valuable. Role-based access control has been helpful while developing the knowledge platform. The roles were defined clearly, which made it easy for the four or five of us to work simultaneously and collaborate on our project in a similar manner.

Read full review

Aryan Singh1

Product Manager at Infozion

Offers good integration features but needs to offer more flexibility in the language option offered

There are a couple of things that can be improved in the tool. When we are talking about communications, the tool has interoperable cataloging. The only thing that needs a certain level of improvement within Meta is the vernacular, which can be dependent, as we cannot choose the process of communication that is happening in it. After I launch a bot, if I move from one country to another, and if the entire communication is happening in German, while I have just moved from France, and I need to buy a particular choice of vehicle, then I would want the entire communication to happen in my language. What Meta does not allow as of now is that if I am reaching out to you in French, then only you can have the conversation in French. You cannot select a language in the middle of a conversation. If I want to have a conversation in French, there is a very limited selection. Until and unless a conversation is triggered from a particular language, we do not have the option to choose another language. The tool gives you flexibility in the language, but that is on the business and not on the customer, which sometimes limits the approachability aspect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SharePoint is smooth and easy to use for editing, updating, and uploading files."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."

"It is very stable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is file sharing or information sharing."

"Tech support tops off as excellent."

"The most valuable feature of SharePoint is its user interface, which is very easy to use."

"I rate it a ten."

"Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems."

More SharePoint pros

"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."

"Storage is the best thing about the solution."

"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."

"The product was easy to use."

"The tool's integration feature benefited the workflow...it helped centralize communication."

Cons

"For the functionality you get at this price point, it leaves a lot to be desired."

"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."

"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."

"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."

"The solution should improve its integration with other project management tools."

"Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users."

"The technical support process should be more streamlined as it usually involves contacting vendors and arranging calls for resolution."

"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."

More SharePoint cons

"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."

"What Meta does not allow as of now is that if I am reaching out to you in French, then only you can have the conversation in French. You cannot select a language in the middle of a conversation."

"The implementation could be made easier."

"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."

"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."

"They are about an eight in comparison to other similar products."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"The pricing is competitive."

"For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

"SharePoint is included with our Microsoft license."

"It is very expensive."

"The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

"The regular package costs us $4 per user per month."

"The solution seemed expensive to me."

"The cost has become one-tenth of the cost in comparison to the old techniques. As we were able to qualify and nurture these leads, the overall cost of the entire sales process was reduced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	81

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

It is not really better; we use the same solution as before with Google Drive and the Google App solution. Sometimes I have to refresh pages more than with Google, but it does not charge; the page ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SharePoint?

I create a data warehouse and establish a link between different applications. For data exchange, the vendor is Oracle.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workplace by Facebook?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workplace by Facebook?

I use the solution in my company to create chatbots for our clients, like BMW in India. We have been working on WhatsApp chatbots and Facebook marketing, where we have integrated Adobe Marketo for ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workplace by Facebook?

In our company, we integrate with Workplace through Facebook's tools that were provided to us, and it is there that we created a middleware system for communication back and forth. Whatever data we...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 9% of the time

Box vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

DocuSign vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

IBM FileNet vs SharePoint

Compared 4% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Yammer vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 28% of the time

Slack Business - Enterprise vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 22% of the time

Jive vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 17% of the time

ChatWork vs Workplace by Facebook

Compared 13% of the time

More Workplace by Facebook Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

February 2026

Download SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Social Software

March 2026

Download Workplace by Facebook product report

Also Known As

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Facebook Workplace, Facebook at Work

Overview

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Microsoft

Facebook Workplace is a dedicated and secure space for companies to connect, communicate and collaborate. Organizations of all sizes can use familiar Facebook features such as News Feed, groups, messages and events to get things done.

Sample Customers

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Royal Bank of Scotland, UST Global, DNB Bank, Smart, IJM Corporation, Telenor Group, Mobilink, Landmark Group, Yes Bank, BrightTALK, Kenshoo, Godrej Consumer Products

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.