Tenable Security Center and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform are both influential in the cybersecurity domain, focusing on vulnerability management and zero-trust architecture, respectively. Zscaler appears to have the upper hand with its seamless integration and comprehensive security offerings appealing particularly for scalable cloud-based deployments.
Features: Tenable Security Center is known for its effective vulnerability scanning features, customizable scanning policies, and the ability to generate strong reports. Its distributed scan model allows tracking across large infrastructures. Conversely, Zscaler is celebrated for its zero-trust architecture enabling secure remote work without constant VPN sign-ins, and ease of integration across various cloud environments.
Room for Improvement: Users of Tenable Security Center seek improved report configuration flexibility, easier third-party integration, and better scanning speeds. Enhancements in risk-acceptance management and reduced training costs are also desired. Zscaler users note performance issues related to speed and latency, calling for more configuration customization and strengthened support services. Visibility and alert functions are also areas for growth.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center, mostly deployed on-premises, is stable but complex to set up, requiring technical expertise. Users report varied experiences with support, facing delays particularly from international teams. Zscaler, being cloud-deployed, is easier to scale and generally backed by responsive support; however, quality can vary regionally. Both products receive positive support feedback, with Zscaler appreciated for quicker global response times.
Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is considered costlier compared to alternatives, like Rapid7, but its high ROI is recognized for its manpower reduction and breach prevention. Zscaler's pricing is favorable with its concurrent user licensing, considered economical for larger deployments where scalability decreases per-user costs. While Tenable emphasizes cost avoidance benefits, Zscaler offers competitive pricing and scalability.
If we cannot adjust how to operate the solution, then it becomes very difficult, so hearing and initial tuning are very important.
Through the use of Tenable Security Center, my clients achieve more efficient patching and gain visibility and understanding of security operations, leading to improved resilience and infrastructure insight.
When I see that I am trying to cut costs, for example, even when replacing Prisma, we have managed to save about over half a million dollars a year.
We don't have to purchase many components such as load balancers and proxy servers that were necessary in traditional setups.
When we could not resolve an issue with the vendor, we referred to them and raised a ticket, which usually resulted in good support from their team.
Longer response times and less thorough assistance.
Sometimes, support takes time since the solution has some bugs that need fixing.
They have provided the numbers and contact supports, and it is almost immediate.
I can scale it extensively with the use of agents, allowing scanning in restrictive environments and loosely connected devices.
Scalability is a bit limited with Tenable Security Center.
The only limitation I was mentioning is that it was unable to identify the sources of vulnerability, which they are going to embed by the mid of this year.
The stability of the solution is outstanding.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is very stable.
It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys.
The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements.
Translating reports into European languages is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform probably needs to be more efficient because scanning takes a lot of time.
They might be able to identify if something is missing with Zscaler.
Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pricing.
The product is somewhat pricey, reflecting its valuable features and status as a high-quality solution in the vulnerability management market.
The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is much, much cheaper when comparing price.
We obtained good reports showing when patches were closed and the details of each patch, including who executed it and everything related to the patching process until it was closed.
The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping.
Tenable Security Center is a relatively very good solution, and I don't think it needs improvement; it's a perfect solution.
We have excellent account management, smooth marketplace engagement, and processing in how my team or organization uses Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform.
Since we started using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, it has auto-configuration, and wherever we have deployed the auto-configuration, we have not encountered any problem.
The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tenable Security Center | 9.0% |
| Qualys VMDR | 12.5% |
| Rapid7 InsightVM | 10.8% |
| Other | 67.7% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform | 9.7% |
| Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | 12.3% |
| Cato SASE Cloud Platform | 10.2% |
| Other | 67.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 42 |
Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.
Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enhances security with seamless cloud-based connectivity and VPN-less operation, offering integration with multiple identity providers and advanced security features, suitable for remote work environments.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides secure, adaptive connectivity without traditional VPNs, allowing organizations to replace legacy systems and bolster remote work security. The platform offers cloud-based protection, single sign-on, dynamic URL categorization, and scalable solutions. While advanced security features like DLP and threat protection enhance data protection, users may face issues with speed, connectivity, and some customization options. Integration challenges, latency due to multi-tenant hosting, reporting delays, and licensing costs require consideration. It supports secure internet access and private application security, ensuring traffic control and data compliance.
What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?
What are the benefits of using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is deployed across industries to secure remote access and enforce zero trust principles. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors utilize it for secure internet access and visibility into cloud applications, enhancing performance and compliance in dynamic environments.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
