VMware Live Recovery vs Vision Solutions Double-Take comparison

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. IBM is ranked #32, while Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. IBM holds a 1.3% mindshare in DRS, compared to Broadcom’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Read 4 Vision Solutions Double-Take reviews

890 Views
507 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

6,033 Views
5,128 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Vision Solutions Double-Take

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Vision Solutions Double-Take and VMware Live Recovery are data backup and recovery products. Vision Solutions Double-Take is favored for its pricing and customer support, while VMware Live Recovery is seen as more advanced due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Vision Solutions Double-Take includes real-time data replication, full server migration, and SQL migrations. VMware Live Recovery provides instant VMware integration, disaster recovery for failed sites, and automated DR workflows.

Room for Improvement: Vision Solutions Double-Take could enhance its automation capabilities, expand its feature set to compete directly with VMware, and optimize integration within virtual environments. VMware Live Recovery can improve its user interface, reduce setup complexity, and potentially lower its initial investment cost.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vision Solutions Double-Take offers straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, making it suitable for various IT infrastructures. VMware Live Recovery, requiring expertise in VMware platforms, is efficient for environments already using VMware, but can be challenging for newcomers.

Pricing and ROI: Vision Solutions Double-Take is known for its cost-effectiveness and strong ROI through reduced downtime. VMware Live Recovery, with higher initial costs, provides value through its advanced features and VMware ecosystem compatibility.

To learn more, read our detailed VMware Live Recovery vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (13th)

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Vision Solutions Double-Take is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 7.4%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.4%
Vision Solutions Double-Take	1.3%
Other	91.3%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

it_user710520

Migration Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way

Full server migration possibility and SQL migrations It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way. Linux compatibility SQL migrations GUI For over a year. Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many…

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It takes less time to replicate files between two servers."

"In Version 7.xx the most valuable feature to me is being able to carry out a test full server failover in which case the primary server is still up and running."

"It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way."

"Customer Service: Second to none Technical Support: Second to none"

"The company was able to provide customers with the required RPO that was not possible with traditional backup solutions."

"Site Recovery Manager is valuable because it helps with the difficult problem of failing a group of virtual machines over to your DR site and bringing them up."

"I give VMware Live Recovery a rating of ten out of ten."

"Virtual Machine Recovery during DR situation, with automation and easy to use menus and options."

"SRM's best feature is automation."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with our Nutanix environment."

"Every feature is quite good, and we haven't faced any issues or complaints."

"In terms of resiliency, the most valuable aspect of SRM has been its effectiveness."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"Yes I encountered issues with deployment. The information provided in the guide just stated about 2 or 3 communication ports but even after these ports are enabled there are still issues with the 2 servers communicating via Double-Take."

"Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many issues happen while migrating these servers."

"Zerto may be more cost efficient, so I’m not 100% sold, and may not need it at all."

"One thing which is lacking from the SRM is reporting."

"It would be good if this solution could integrate configuration management software such as Chef Infra."

"VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery could improve by enhancing the network bandwidth from the storage."

"Currently, there is a limitation of consolidating only 15 sites per SRM."

"The solution must provide better integration with third-party vendors."

"DR drill report is good but needs to be improved, and the replication monitoring feature is not available."

"The user experience could be more friendly."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost of SRM is on par with market rates."

"VMware SRM is an expensive solution, and users need to pay extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The price could be lower, in general. My clients pay for an annual license."

"We have a standard enterprise license for the solution."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for VMware SRM, which is not very expensive."

"The price of VMware SRM depends on how many VMs the customer has to move. There is a difference between the standard and enterprise license. I'm presenting the standard license to my customers because the total of VMs is not more than 50. The customer needs only the standard license and the cost is very effective for him."

"It is about $3,000 a year for the 25 pack. The package gives you the ability to protect up to 25 virtual machines."

"The licensing costs are increasing."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 10% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Availability vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 4% of the time

More Vision Solutions Double-Take Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 33% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

February 2026

Download Vision Solutions Double-Take product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

February 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

Double-Take, DoubleTake

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

Continuous data protection, high-availability and disaster recovery software and services.

IBM

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, Accessor Capital Management, Adventist Health, Alfa Bank, Alphawest Services, Ameristar Casinos, Ambrian Capital PLC

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

March 2026

Free Report: VMware Live Recovery vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware Live Recovery vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our VMware Live Recovery vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.