ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Reviews

The solution is used for endpoint users and Samsung servers.

The administration is its most valuable feature as I can see all versions in one place. 

I used Avira previously and ESET lacks certain aspects in comparison to Avira. 

I have been using ESET Endpoint Antivirus for two years.

It is a highly stable solution. 

At present two hundred people are using the solution. 

Previously I had used Avira, which is a German antivirus solution. 

ESET's initial setup is straightforward. The setup follows a standard procedure. 

ESET is cheap.

I recommend using the solution. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. 

ESET Endpoint Security’s most valuable feature is the management console. Additionally, it doesn’t need a high-performing CPU for software servers. It has the best security feature as well. It provides 100% security by detecting dangerous web pages and illegal sources.

The product’s AI implementation feature could be better for learning user behavior. There could be a feature to detect unsecured devices in the network similar to its older version. We need additional agents for it at present.

We have been using ESET Endpoint Security for three years. At present, we are using the latest version.

I rate the product’s stability a nine out of ten.

The product is highly scalable. I rate its scalability a ten out of ten. There are 150 users in one organization and 25 users in another organization that I manage. It is suitable for medium businesses.

The product’s initial setup is straightforward and fast. I rate the process a nine or ten out of ten. It requires minimal technical staff for deployment.

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten. It is neither cheap nor expensive for our clients. We use the free version, and there are no additional costs involved.

ESET Endpoint Security is a good product for finding new devices and alerting administrators. It has always succeeded compared to other solutions. I never have a problem with security using it. It provides 100% safety for the environment and users.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

ESET Endpoint Antivirus has several useful features. Firstly, it offers parental control options, allowing users to manage and restrict access for children. Additionally, it can block certain web pages that may contain viruses or pose a threat to the computer.

The problem was that it didn't support Windows 7. That's why I had to switch temporarily. So it should be more compatible with different operating systems.

I have been using this solution for a year. I am using the latest version. 

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It is not ten because it does not support Windows 7. 

The scalability of the solution is good. Only I am using the solution. 

The initial setup was fine. It was easy. It took less than an hour to deploy. 

It was done in-house. I needed technical help while trying to update it to Windows 7. And I still wasn't able to do it. 

I paid for a yearly license. It is not expensive; the pricing model is fine. 

I am satisfied with ESET Endpoint Antivirus. I would definitely recommend using the solution. It is easy to use and a good solution. 

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We have 400 seats, and we use Linux Windows and don't have a lot of Macs, so we haven't tested the level of Mac protection. However, this solution is mostly for device protection from malware and ransomware. It's for endpoint security.

We had a log4j attack, and ESET was able to protect our server. 

They do not give us a lot of false positives.

It is not heavy on the server. It does not use a lot of computing power.

The facility of use is very good.

Ransomware protection is embedded in the solution.

It offers effective ransomware protection and good protection overall. 

We have been able to very effectively block attacks. 

The simplicity of the solution is excellent.

It can scale well. 

It would be useful if they could automate the deployment more. 

We have to deploy agent management before deploying software. For Windows, they have an all-in-one package. However, this is not available for Linux. If they had an all-stack protection for Linux, Windows, and Mac, that would be ideal. 

Basic technical support could be better. 

We've used the solution for about four years. 

We have around 400 seats in our company.

It's really great in terms of scaling. We haven't had any issues with extendibility. I have no fears about our being able to scale. 

Technical support is okay. They have online chat. However, it's not always easy to reach the right person. You could get more premium support which is better and does direct you to more local support.

Neutral

The initial setup isn't too difficult. I'd rate it nine out of ten in terms of the ease of setup. It's easy to deploy. We install it on-premise, and it is easy to configure. However, if you want to deploy more agents, you have to do it in two steps instead of one.

The pricing is fair. 

We are looking to do a demo of a variety of solutions to see how they would stand up.

We are not an MSP. We are more of a client. 

Overall, they offer good protection at a good price and have a lot of functionality and configuration. It's my go-to product when I consider security at home or at my business. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

The solution is primarily used as a security tool. We're a distributor of several security technologies. This is an MDR solution. It's similar to Sophos. It protects endpoints. It offers an antivirus and also manages malware as well. 

It's a good, medium-level MDR. It's good for medium-sized companies.

It's on par with other products on the market, when it comes to endpoint protection.

The remediation and deep learning are very helpful. They tout that malware can be killed within 30 seconds.

Its security approach is very deep.

It's stable and reliable. 

The solution can scale. 

The pricing is reasonable. 

I'm unsure as to if they could actually support a large enterprise.

They need to continue to develop their position within the MDR market.

They should develop an XDR solution. That would be the next step for them.

I started with this company in January. However, the company has dealt with the solution for three or four years. 

If you have a simple setup, the stability is good. It is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution offers good scalability. However, if it is a very large setup, for example, 10,000 or more endpoints, I'm not sure how it would hold up. 

We do not have a lot of customers using the solution. 

Technical support is quite good. 

I've dealt with many security solutions, including Sophos and Cynet. 

I'm not sure how easy or complex the setup is. I do not handle the deployment. I'm in sales. 

I'm not clear on the exact cost of the licensing. I don't handle the configurations. That said, the solution is not overly expensive. 

I'm a reseller, and I work with system integrators in Italy.

ESET tends to push the SaaS contract.

I'd recommend the solution to other users. 

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. 

I have a very simple use case which is for providing protection on my home network.

ESET provides good protection.

I don't know if it's possible but I'm always looking for better protection. 

I've been using this solution for 10 years. 

The solution is stable. 

This product is for personal use so I haven't tested scalability.

The initial setup is straightforward, it takes a few minutes. 

I think the licensing costs are reasonable. 

If you're providing a solution that prevents people from gaining access to my network then I'm happy. I recommend this product and rate it 10 out of 10. 

We primarily use the solution for endpoint protection. It protects end-users and small companies as well.

It can keep PCs and devices secure. We can see if there are any issues from outside sources or emails that are a threat.

We have found we don't have many threats. We can look at the history and see which actions get declined. 

The price was very reasonable. 

It's light. I almost don't know that I am using it. The solution is stable. 

I can't speak to any missing features. 

It's not scalable in that you cannot use a license for multiple devices. 

We'd like the solution to make even more updates to ensure protection from the latest threats. 

I've been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. 

The solution is scalable in that you pay for a license per device. If you need more licenses, you just buy them. That way, you can expand your coverage as needed. 

However, you cannot use a license on multiple devices. 

We have five users on the solution so far. 

I've never used technical support. 

I did not previously use other solutions. 

The setup is easy. It was preinstalled on the computer. It took two minutes to put it as "active," and it would start working.

You do not need anyone to manage deployment and maintenance tasks. 

We have witnessed an ROI in terms of security. It saves money by having users avoid recovery costs when a device is attacked. 

The product pricing is very reasonable.

You need to pay for a license for every device.

We pay an annual fee to use the solution. 

I'm likely using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

The software is stable and runs without any issues and users can check the actions that are taken and detected. It's easy to use. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for endpoint security. We use it on PCs, laptops, and software. It acts as an antivirus.

The solution is user-friendly with good memory. It's not heavy and very simple.

It is stable and reliable. 

We can scale the product if we need to.

The pricing is reasonable. 

It's easy to set up and quick to deploy. 

We'd like the solution to be a next generation antivirus with some sort of artificial intelligence or machine learning angle. 

I've used the solution for around ten years. 

The stability I'd rate eight out of ten. It's very reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The scalability is good. I'd rate it seven out of ten. 

We have around 200 users on the solution right now. 

We previously used McAfee. However, it was too heavy for us. It needed too much memory.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. I'd rate the ease of setup eight out of ten. 

Deployment should only be around two or three minutes. It is very fast.

While we bought the solution from a third-party, we installed the solution ourselves, in-house. 

We did not find the solution to be too expensive. 

The solution costs around $20 or $30 per user per year.

We're customers and end-users. 

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

Overall, I would rate the product eight out of ten. 

We just use the solution for ongoing coverage and protection against malware. We have it on our machines, and we just let it do its thing. It does its scans, and there's real-time monitoring. It is basically for everyday use, we just put it on and let it go.

Overall, it's a good product. It's transparent. It rarely gets in the way, and we don't even notice it scanning. 

When something does come up that's problematic, it comes up with a popup and lets you decide whether to delete or quarantine.

The solution is stable. 

I'm not aware of any areas that need improvement. 

What we need is the same as what we would need with any other malware product. It's got to keep up to date with the latest threats, which they do. It's always an ongoing thing with endpoint protection or really with any kind of security, you've got to be up on the latest threats.

I've used the solution for at least a couple of years. It's likely been around four or so.

The stability is perfect. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

I have not tried to scale the product. I wouldn't know if it scales. 

We have 20 employees on the product right now and about 15 endpoints. 

I've never used technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are.

I'm not the network admin and therefore did not deal with the latest setup.

We have a network administrator that handles any necessary maintenance. 

I don't deal with licensing. I'm not sure as to what it costs. 

I'm an end-user.

From my experience, it's been solid, thorough, and transparent behind the scenes. It just does its thing. I'm very happy with it.

I would recommend it. I'd rate it nine out of ten.

The normal security tracking and the real-time warning of viruses or possible threats. We have not currently used the Dynamic Scanner option to set it up for their servers to be checked, but we are planning on activating that on some of our computers. The reports and the data received by the ESET console to feed also our order management tools. The CMDB that we use and have a unique solution, a unique point that oversees all the solutions we have.

The price could be a little lower and the deployment process could be easier.
Dual management for the customer, who needs to access the local on-premise console from a remote cloud-based console.

I have been using ESET Endpoint Security for the past few months.

We have not had any issues with the stability of ESET Endpoint Security.

We are currently happy with the scalability of ESET Endpoint Security.  We are using it with some of our small customers and are not having any issues.

Technical support is very good. Well, truthfully, we did not have any big issues, so we do not know if there is a real case, or what would happen, but so far, they have been very helpful and they resolved our problems in several hours.

The deployment is complex and not very easy to use for most people. You need to be a well-informed IT person for deployment.

The product is good. It has a good interface, but it was not as straightforward as we expected to deploy to the first computers, compared, for example, to the Kaspersky Security Center. You have complete many steps to manage to deploy it. Kaspersky was more efficient, more, let's call it, Adobe-proof.

We found good pricing because we did a trade-off between Kaspersky to ESET.  They were very helpful to gain a customer at this moment in time, but the full price is probably a little higher than most other solutions.

I think that from the user perspective, it is very similar to Kaspersky. They don't have major differences. Maybe ESET has the Dynamic Scanner option which is something that Kaspersky does not have. That might be a plus towards the Zero-day issues that can come over, but so far, we did not have any use for it. We hope not to have any needs, even in the future.

I would rate ESET Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.