ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Reviews

I use ESET Endpoint Security to detect malware.

ESET Endpoint Security's best feature is that it's invisible until it detects a problem.

ESET Endpoint Security lacks some advanced functionalities and features which would be useful to be interconnected with the solutions we use, such as Microsoft 365.

I've been using ESET Endpoint Security for more than five years.

I've had no problems with ESET Endpoint Security's stability.

ESET Endpoint Security is very scalable - we scaled up and down by a few hundred users in a month with no problems.

I'm really satisfied with ESET's technical support, they solve all of our problems immediately.

The initial setup was quick and easy.

I advise anybody considering ESET Endpoint Security to find a good partner to implement it. I would rate ESET Endpoint Security as eight out of ten.

We are using ESET Endpoint Security to protect our PCs.

Most of our clients are not hooked directly to the internet limiting the chance of threats.

The most valuable feature in ESET Endpoint Security is the game mode to restrict notifications.

The user interface of ESET Endpoint Security could be more user-friendly and more features could be added.

I have been using ESET Endpoint Security for approximately 10 years

ESET Endpoint Security is highly stable.

The scalability of ESET Endpoint Security is good. We can buy more licenses if we add a computer or two.

I have used the support from ESET Endpoint Security.

I rate the support from ESET Endpoint Security a five out of five.

I have not used another solution other than ESET Endpoint Security.

The initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security is very simple.

We do not have any maintenance costs because it is a stable solution. We do not have notifications and we do scans when needed. 

I rate the price of ESET Endpoint Security a five out of five.

The price of the solution is very good compared to other solutions.

I rate ESET Endpoint Security a five out of ten.

We used ESET Endpoint Antivirus for the workstations to prevent Trojans, worms, and malware.

I liked that ESET Endpoint Antivirus was light, easy to install, and easy to integrate.

Online security could still be improved in ESET Endpoint Antivirus because security is threatened by phishing.

We used ESET Endpoint Antivirus for three years, but then we moved to a different solution. We used it in the previous year before we moved to Microsoft Defender.

ESET Endpoint Antivirus was easy to scale.

We didn't contact the ESET Endpoint Antivirus support team.

We didn't use a different solution previously, because we started with ESET Endpoint Antivirus.

The initial setup for ESET Endpoint Antivirus was straightforward. We installed it on many workstations.

We deployed ESET Endpoint Antivirus with our in-house team.

You need to pay for the ESET Endpoint Antivirus license monthly or yearly, whichever you choose.

We used the latest version of ESET Endpoint Antivirus.

We had one engineer who was responsible for the maintenance of the solution. We had fifteen users of the solution before we shifted to ESET Endpoint Protection Advanced.

I would recommend ESET Endpoint Antivirus to others, but currently, we're using Microsoft Defender.

I'm giving ESET Endpoint Antivirus a rating of seven.

We are using ESET PROTECT for endpoint protection.

The dashboard is useful for management, and its cost for the features is hard to beat.

It is rather easy to use. It is pretty much hands-off once you get it set up on the machines. We've not had any issues, and it has been easy to maintain. 

The update process can be improved, and there could be an automatic update process when a new version comes out. For system updates or program updates, there could be more automation.

I have been using this solution since I came to this organization. It has probably been 10 years. 

We have not had any stability-related problems with it.

It is very scalable. In terms of its users, from senior management to production floor workers, we probably have 450 users. 

In terms of usage, we're using the basics of it. There is probably more we could do. We're not utilizing it at 100%.

They've been very helpful anytime we've had an issue. They're easy to work with, and it's usually a straight phone call. Their online help and chat function have been good, but if an issue needs any more than that, a phone call has been very helpful.

We've had it since I've been here.

It was implemented before I got here, but its setup is straightforward.

As far as I know, it was implemented in-house. Its maintenance is pretty much handled by one person.

The bang for the buck is as good as I've seen out there.

It is just under $20 a user per year, and there are no additional costs. I would rate it a five out of five in terms of pricing.

I would advise looking at all the features and finding out which one is going to work for you.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use ESET Endpoint Security to control the endpoints. We can run full control of endpoints and receive good information from ESET about the endpoints.

The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Security performance.

I have used ESET Endpoint Security for approximately 10 years.

I have found ESET Endpoint Security to be stable.

ESET Endpoint Security is scalable.

We have approximately 350 users using ESET Endpoint Security.

The technical support from ESET Endpoint Security is good.

The initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security can be complicated when you get involved with encryption.

There is a license required to use ESET Endpoint Security.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate ESET Endpoint Security nine out of ten.

One of my customers was attacked by ransomware twice. The first time, I was able to roll it back because the attackers seemed to be using an old version of ransomware. We were able to find the crack for it and unencrypted everything. It was amazing. During the second ransomware attack, we were watching it happen, so we shut it down. The key, of course, is backup. The backup was there, and we restored it.

It's hard to evaluate the effectiveness of antivirus stuff because you don't know if it's working well until something happens. ESET has regular updates, and it gives me good feedback. It's not too onerous like some of the products I've used in the past.

ESET's updates are mostly manual. That's my biggest concern. I'd like it to be more automatic. I've had to download the new version and run it manually to install it. I've got several workstations like that right now.

All security solutions seem to update automatically these days. I think there are good technical reasons for that. 

At the customer's site where I deployed ESET most recently, there are about 20 to 25 workstations, and ESET is deployed individually on each.

As far as I know, everything's very stable.

I've gotten good support in Canada when I've needed it. But, interestingly enough, their distribution in Canada seems to have gotten confused a little bit. Support in Canada is well organized, but the product has evolved, and they've gone through some changes in their distribution. I haven't talked to them for about a year.

I was using Malwarebytes as a stopgap solution, but I'm sure they have a whole corporate strategy. I started using ESET initially because they had a centralized control tool. Maybe Malwarebytes has changed so it's managed in the cloud now. I haven't explored that or used a cloud version of the software.

Setting up ESET is reasonably complex but not onerous. It depends on who is installing it. 
I wouldn't expect any of my clients to deal with it, but I'll happily work through it. The installation process has evolved. I initially set it up using the central control function. In later versions, ESET's central tool was replaced. After I had installed that, I just used the individual ones. 

We pay for an annual license that costs about $35 per workstation. 

I'd rate ESET eight out of 10. I think there's always room for improvement. However, I must admit that if I had to choose again and had the proper reviews, I might conceivably switch to a product based in North America. I've become quite sensitive to the political aspects of having offshore security software. That will probably be my most significant deciding factor if I change.

Most antivirus programs seem to be decent. We haven't seen any reports of solutions doing a lousy job in the marketplace. I suspect all the big ones only do an okay job. The truth is that the best defense against ransomware is simply backup.

We use ESET Endpoint Security for system security.

The solution is very lightweight and does not consume that much processor in terms of CPU utilization. The centralized management system is very good.

The detection could be better in ESET Endpoint Security. Sometimes it takes time to detect threats and might be because it's not holding all the memory. There are some features that have to mature. More features might be available in the higher-end product. 

The cloud version of the solution could improve.

I have used ESET Endpoint Security within the last 12 months.

The stability of ESET Endpoint Security is above average but excellent.

The application updates are very good. They do not affect the performance of the PC. If the users have a medium-scale PC the solution operates very well. If the user's PCs have the latest processor and it is updated, they can use some other product. A faster PC does not get impacted by the software if it is heavier on resources.

We do not have plans to increase usage at this time. We are not using the solution extensively.

ESET Endpoint Security does not require any maintenance, it is done automatically.

We are always looking at new product technology innovation.

I have evaluated Sophos' solutions.

There is some antivirus software, such as McAfee when it is very difficult to install the software on some devices. When we patch or make some reports, it does not show them in the report. It's not communicating with the licensed software or a similar issue.

Technology is growing and changing fast. People are working from home, and office, products should be capable of handling the office and the home environments. This is the challenge.

My advice to others wanting this type of solution is to check all the Endpoint Security solutions available. The threat signatures and sandbox features are good to have if there is an attack, they can detect them and give updates for their users. The faster the better. The cloud versions of threat detection solutions are very good and are really important.

I rate ESET Endpoint Security a six out of seven.

I use for ESET Endpoint Antivirus to protect my personal and business files.

The performance of the solution is very good it does not impact my hardware and is user-friendly.

The solution could improve by having higher-level security and reporting.

I have been using ESET Endpoint Antivirus for approximately six years.

ESET Endpoint Antivirus is stable.

I have found ESET Endpoint Antivirus scalable.

We have approximately 150 users using this solution.

I have not faced an issue that I would need to contact the support.

I have used Kaspersky and Trend Micro previously.

The installation is straightforward.

When comparing ESET Endpoint Antivirus to other antivirus programs, such as Trend Micro or Kaspersky, it is the best. The other two were too heavy on the system resources, it consumes a lot of hardware. Additionally, they could not detect auto-run viruses.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate ESET Endpoint Antivirus a nine out of ten.