Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pros and cons

Vendor: Forcepoint

4.0 out of 5

59 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention integrates with Cloud Access Security Broker, enhancing cloud application security. It boasts advanced fingerprinting and OCR capabilities for data protection but requires improved email integration and support for Bangla. While scalability and customization fit various companies, false positives and CPU consumption issues remain. Despite robust data visibility and compliance features, enhancing Forcepoint support is needed for better troubleshooting and customer assistance.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention provides excellent sensitive data protection and block unauthorized data sharing effectively.

The integration capabilities, especially with Cloud Access Security Broker, enhance its security around cloud applications.

Its scalability and customization options allow it to fit the needs of companies regardless of size.

The built-in rules, templates, and content classifiers simplify policy creation and management.

Features like Optical Character Recognition and fingerprinting offer advanced data discovery and classification.

CONS

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention should improve its integration with email and other platforms, as it is not efficient for drive or chat scenarios.

Pricing is a concern with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, as high costs and lack of discounts for bulk purchases make budget approvals difficult.

Support and service from Forcepoint are often considered lacking, as users frequently experience delays in receiving assistance when needed.

Users are concerned about the occurrence of false positives, highlighting a need for improved data classification capabilities within Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention lacks end-to-end integration for security across network, communication channels, and other tools in a consolidated manner.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pros review quotes

reviewer1598412

Management Executive at a security firm with 11-50 employees

Sep 23, 2021

The scalability is fantastic. One of the things that I like about Forcepoint is that I can customize the solution to suit my objectives.

Read full review

IT Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

May 23, 2019

The ease of configuration was probably one of its biggest selling points.

Read full review

MD

Sr. Manager at 2Five1

Aug 17, 2021

The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions.

Read full review

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Free Report: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Enterprise Information Security Analyst at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Apr 7, 2021

The built-in rules, templates, and content classifiers are among the most valuable features. Some of the built-in patterns are good places to get started with. Along with the phrases, they are helpful in putting together policies and fine-tuning our policies.

Read full review

Principal. - Head - IT, Information Security and Admin at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Aug 4, 2021

One of the most valuable features is being able to see file movement, where files are going. Every week we review the files. It can identify software codes, so we code files and we know where they're going and who's doing what. It gives us visibility.

Read full review

Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Aug 12, 2019

Another valuable feature is that it provides integration to things like Cloud Access Security Broker, which provides security around cloud applications.

Read full review

KC

KrishnaChaitanya4

Manager at KPMG

May 22, 2022

I like that you can quickly create policies and enforce them in a matter of minutes.

Read full review

Hassan Moussafir

Information Security Senior Expert at Wafaassurance

Jan 26, 2020

The solution offers very good sensitive data protection.

Read full review

Kamal Abdelrahman

Country Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Feb 21, 2022

The Forcepoint tool is well developed. It is ranked in many evaluations at the top when it comes to enterprise DLP solutions. It has good artificial intelligence that enables our customers to focus on specific incidents, instead of having a complicated list of uncategorized incidents.

Read full review

Muhammad Ali Aziz

Senior Manager Cyber Security Services & Solutions at Trillium

Oct 11, 2022

Forcepoint offers many policies that conform to global DLP best practices, including requirements specific to regions like the Middle East, Europe, etc. They have a policy database in their product. That feature is unique to Forcepoint. Their AI and fingerprinting are incredibly effective and robust. We have tested it multiple times. It always catches the correct data being leaked.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 57)

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Cons review quotes

reviewer1598412

Management Executive at a security firm with 11-50 employees

Sep 23, 2021

With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format.

Read full review

IT Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

May 23, 2019

I can't push a report by a certain organizational entity or unit without a lot of work. The reporting could be better.

Read full review

MD

Sr. Manager at 2Five1

Aug 17, 2021

Their discovery or the way they discover the data at risk can also be improved. There are many database servers that are not supported by Forcepoint.

Read full review

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Free Report: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Enterprise Information Security Analyst at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Apr 7, 2021

The user-friendliness of the interface in formulating DLP policies could be improved. An example would be managing policies. It's a little daunting at first, and can be confusing, at times, when it comes to how to set things up and how to add policies. They could improve on that.

Read full review

Principal. - Head - IT, Information Security and Admin at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Aug 4, 2021

I would like to see improvement in the reporting. We can only get one week's worth of data; we can't get more than that. Also, the reporting console is very slow, making it very frustrating to use.

Read full review

Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Aug 12, 2019

I am really impressed by the interface and management console but the requirements are very high and the response time is too slow.

Read full review

KC

KrishnaChaitanya4

Manager at KPMG

May 22, 2022

It would be better if we could easily integrate with other products. Suppose I want to integrate this DLP with some other CASB solutions or a firewall solution. In that case, it takes a considerable amount of time because Forcepoint DLP doesn't come with a legacy firewall or CASB solutions to integrate with it. We need to do it separately. It's not improvised for different sectors, and I need to look for other solutions. I'm investing a lot of time researching and implementing other solutions for other areas. That is one point where I can't feel satisfied with this Forcepoint DLP. The only problem we have faced is that it consumes most of the CPU whenever a Forcepoint DLP is deployed on an endpoint. This is when users feel some lag in their machine's performance or their Internet performance. That's when we uninstall and try to reinstall, or we'll give a cloud link to which it gets access. We use Forcepoint DLP for endpoint protection, not for email or cloud. For email and drive, we went with the Google DLP. Forcepoint DLP isn't as efficient on drive or chat, or email. For that, we have some specialized solutions, but it would be better to have a single console where you can control all these areas. It would be pretty easy for a consumer who is going to use this product. All in one shot, you can try to track it and enforce your policies on a single dashboard. That is one point currently lacking in Forcepoint, and I feel they need to work on it. In the next release, I would like to use this DLP across different solutions like network, firewall, email, or chat with a consolidated dashboard and with integration facilities with other solutions. Security should work as a whole. It shouldn't work individually in blocks. It does not serve our purpose. It should be integrated with multiple solutions. For that, it should have enough intelligence to work with other tools. I'm looking forward to seeing that kind of capability with Forcepoint.

Read full review

Hassan Moussafir

Information Security Senior Expert at Wafaassurance

Jan 26, 2020

It would be wonderful if the solution could develop more AI and machine learning capabilities. It would also be good if the solution was able to integrate with other ML and AI solutions. Right now, this is lacking.

Read full review

Kamal Abdelrahman

Country Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Feb 21, 2022

There is room for improvement regarding OCR. I would like to see it enhanced to handle multiple languages and it should be easier to manage.

Read full review

Muhammad Ali Aziz

Senior Manager Cyber Security Services & Solutions at Trillium

Oct 11, 2022

They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 57)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Varonis Platform vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Digital Guardian vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

GitGuardian Platform vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Mimecast Incydr vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Trellix DLP vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Safetica ONE vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Varonis Platform vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Digital Guardian vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

GitGuardian Platform vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Mimecast Incydr vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Trellix DLP vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Safetica ONE vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

See all alternatives

Related questions

30

Symantec Endpoint vs. McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection: Technical Comparison Between Data Loss Protection Solutions

190

When should companies use SSL Inspection?

49

What software solution would you recommend to monitor user machines?

135

What is the difference between "data protection in transit" vs "data protection at rest"?

29

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

23

Endpoint DLP for Mac Network

16

Best alternatives to Digital Guardian for data protection?

710

What is Cognitive Cybersecurity and what is it used for?

172

Which solution do you prefer: Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, or Microsoft Purview DLP?

8

When evaluating Data Loss Protection, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?