Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Reviews

I am using Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention for security.

We have not implemented the solution fully and it is still being configured.

The solution is stable overall.

The implementation could be improved.

I have been using Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention for approximately three months.

I did not experience any crashes. The solution has been stable in my usage.

I rate the scalability of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention a four out of ten.

I have used the support from Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.

I rate the support from Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention a seven out of ten.

I have used a similar Microsoft solution to Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, and the Microsoft solution was better. However, we were using Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention because we had a contract.

The initial setup of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is of medium difficulty level.

I have not seen an ROI at this time. I have only used the solution for a short time. I would need approximately one year to determine the ROI.

The price of the solution is expensive.

I rate Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention a five out of ten.

We use this solution for data loss prevention, enforcement and monitored file labeling. 

Having visibility under a single console has helped us. 

The solution has multiple modules and is good with integration. It also enables data classification and monitored file labeling. It's a classic solution. 

They should support additional customization of SMTP or port customization.

We've been using this solution for four years. 

The stability is very good. 

Scalability comes with the license so it's based on your requirements. If you want to increase the number of users you may need to rescale. To do that requires different hardware. 

The customer support is far from perfect but it's okay. 

Because the solution is deployed on premise, you need to deploy every component based on SQL.

It's important to work your way through the console first because you'll need it to manage the solution. There are multiple components and they all need to be understood. 

I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

We primarily use the solution for data loss prevention.

The good side of the Forcepoint DLP is integrating with the end user behavior dynamically. 

The formation level defining a DLP has become a very static form. In the case of Forcepoint, if it is possible to implement it, they integrate with the end user behavior analytics and then dynamically can run which documents should go to home. This is the most fascinating part.

The integration is great. It's good for dynamically assigning the volume and dynamically blocking some points based on the behavior change.

The most challenging part of DLP is the categorization of documents. Most organizations take the parts and the products, and then finally, the phase is difficult to categorize their product, and these are all very static.

The deployment can be difficult. 

It could be priced a bit lower.

I've been using the solution for two or three years. 

It is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

I can't speak to the scalability. It's not an aspect that I've extensively tested.

Technical support was fine. They were well trained and knowledgable. 

I started with Forcepoint only. I have never used any other solution.

The deployment may be a bit difficult. 

We only need one or two people for maintenance and deployment tasks. 

We implemented the solution ourselves with the help of technical support. They had people that were trained in the prcoess.

The pricing is moderate. I'd rate it three out of five in terms of affordability.

We are Forcepoint partners.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a pretty decent product in general. 

The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved.

Forcepoint is the one I see most frequently mentioned in a lot of webinars or insider threat discussions. 

It is a product that is commonly referenced.

Everything takes a long time, as it does in every software company, especially since COVID. That is something I notice with every product I use.

I have been working with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention for three years.

We are working with the most up-to-date version.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a stable solution.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is scalable.

It is widely used throughout the business.

Response time is slow.

The initial setup is typically straightforward. 

It is unique to every environment. Some things break when you set up a new network or system. It's trial and error.  

Compared to other products, it wasn't overly complicated, It is the same or standard.

I would rate Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention a seven out of ten.

It is a good product. 

I am not overly excited about it, but I believe that all of the software has the same issues that I do.

It is the same problems I have had with other software, such as the customer service being slow, something breaking, or there's a patching issue. 

The incident management and fingerprinting have been the most valuable features.

The policy update size and agent size could be improved. We would also like to have a proper solution for Linux OS which Forcepoint does not offer. In a future release, we would like to have improved integrations. 

I have been using this solution for five years. 

It is a stable solution. 

It is a scalable solution.

The customer support team take a long time to resolve issues.

We have previously used Endpoint Protector. Both Endpoint and Forcepoint have their own strength and weakness.

The initial setup is complex. 

This solution is quite expensive. 

It is an enterprise grade solution and it has all the capabilities which one should have in a DLP including CASB, network DLP and email DLP.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is used for data protection.

An area for improvement for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is its price. It would be good if they could offer better pricing.

I started using Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention three or four years ago.

This product is very good. It's very stable.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is scalable.

I'm satisfied with the technical support for this product.

Though I didn't install Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, there were no major issues with its installation. I had the help of technicians in terms of installing this solution.

Pricing for this solution could be better.

I'm satisfied with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention in general. It's okay.

We don't have much expectation in the next upgrade of this solution, because we still have no plan for any expansion or growth in our business. Currently, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is okay.

We have 100 users of this solution in our company. For deployment and maintenance, we only have IT staff who is in charge, e.g. our IT admin.

We currently don't have plans to increase usage for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.

I will definitely recommend this product to people who need a DLP solution.

I'm rating Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention a nine out of ten.

We are using it for PCI compliance.

One of the most valuable features is the set of built-in policies that Forcepoint has for PCI compliance. We just need to activate them and start working. Without them, it would be a big task to do a data transformation. Another advantage is that Forcepoint also updates these policies. If there is a new control for PCI compliance, Forcepoint updates it in its system and it can be downloaded.

Forcepoint is also easy to use and manage.

The reporting features, the real-time reporting, can be improved in Forcepoint. On the dashboard, we don't have a feature that shows real-time incidents. We have to schedule a report in the environment.

I have been using Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention for two years. I am a partner for Forcepoint and Symantec. I suggest DLP solutions to my customers.

Forcepoint is very stable. Symantec is also very stable.

Forcepoint is quite scalable. If we have more network traffic, we can add an appliance and it will be enough for that increased traffic. It scales up.

The number of users in environments where we have deployed Forcepoint is between 5,000 and 7,000.

I would rate Forcepoint's technical support at eight to nine out of 10. The support has separate sections, including essential support and basic support.

The initial setup of Forcepoint is straightforward. It uses a Microsoft SQL database and the solution is implemented on Microsoft Windows Servers. When it's based on Microsoft, the solution is very integratable. Optimization of the installation is not complex. It is just like installing other software on Windows. We just need to learn the setup process and click some tabs and the solution is installed.

In general, the initial setup of the different components of Forcepoint takes only two to three days.

Our process is that we first install the database and then we install the Forcepoint Security Manager, which is the centralized location for policy management and reporting for all the solutions' components. Then, if required, we install the additional Security Manager. It is straightforward. Next, we implement the DLP on the endpoints, and then we work through the network side.

One of our recent deployments of Forcepoint was for a bank that has requirements for PCI compliance. In terms of what they invested in the solution, they got the value back within a quarter.

The licensing of Forcepoint is quite straightforward. It's based on the number of users. The support fees are a separate cost.

The main functionality of both Forcepoint and Symantec is actually the same. But when it comes to deployment, Symantec's solution is difficult to deploy. To deploy Forcepoint I only need three Windows servers, but to deploy Symantec DLP I need eight Windows Servers.

With Forcepoint, we can take backups automatically from the appliance itself, using the Security Manager, in case of disaster. We just schedule a backup job and it takes the backup from there. But with Symantec DLP there is no feature for backing up and we have to do the backup manually.

But for larger enterprises, Symantec provides an Oracle Database where there are no limitations for keeping incident data in the database. Forcepoint uses a SQL database that can't hold as much data. Large enterprises often use the Linux operating system for their core applications. Symantec fully supports a Linux implementation of the core architecture of PLP in a Linux environment, but Forcepoint is only installed on Microsoft. This is one of the biggest factors for larger organizations, given that they often require a PLP solution.

If an organization is small or medium in size, I would deploy Forcepoint for it. The price and the architecture requirements, and the equipment required for small and medium businesses, is reasonable. For large enterprises, with more than 20,000 users, I would deploy Symantec.

The primary use case is to protect sensitive data going out of the organization and helping the team to manage the incidents to create few to no false-positive incidents. 

Mac users can use Forcepoint DLP without any problem. They can create user-defined policies rather than using pre-defined ones. Using the fingerprinting policy can safeguard any data kept on a particular drive. We're using OCR to protect data being sent out through images implementing discovery policies to check if any particular file is been shared.  

The Forcepoint DLP is such a useful tool for organizations as it protects sensitive data with multiple kinds of functionality such as OCR and an analytics engine (which helps determine if any sensitive data is in danger of policy violations). It's easy to determine the incidents that have been triggered. This has helped to identify what sensitive data has been shared. The only part where it didn't work so well is during agent upgrading. If we automatically try to upgrade the agent it causes a lot of problems.

With OCR and Risk Analysis, we are able to determine if anything sensitive is been shared. OCR helps us to safeguard those things and with risk ranking, we can determine which user is trying to violate policies multiple times even though they have been blocked to him or her. It does require additional servers, as the processing and result of the incident is high, however, it's worth using to see all the use cases being met with these two features as well. They are the best features provided by Forcepoint.

The feature which needs improvement is the Forcepoint agent upgrading. When you automatically try to upgrade the agent it causes problems. For example, the system starts to behave abnormally or the agent is unable to communicate with the policy engine. If we try to upgrade to new version with the old version running, sometimes it works without any issue, but sometimes it causes a lot of issues and it gets disconnected from the DLP servers. 

You can see incidents via delays on the console even if the agent is properly installed and connected with the proper policy updates.

I've used the solution for two years.

Our main target is banking, insurance, and pharmacy — my main clientele.

I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure.

There is an admin and you have to monitor the solution all the time. The same is true even if you use Symantec or Digital Guardian's DLP — it's all the same. They all require one administrator to monitor the system every day. In short, DLP solutions are good to have, but they do require maintenance.

In terms of human resources, if you have a DLP solution, you have to monitor it every day. Regardless of budget.

I would like to see some file access rights management. This allows users to access whichever files, folders, and resources they choose. This is something Forcepoint and Symantec both don't offer. 

I have been using this solution for roughly four years.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is really scalable. Some of my customers have 20,000 licenses, others have five licenses.

The technical support is very good. From a Forcepoint perspective, they're quite responsive. If I were to open a ticket now, they would respond within an hour. They're quite quick.

I used to use Symantec DLP. Licensing-wise, Forcepoint is easier to deploy with less infrastructure. But at the end of the day, if you want the full suite, Forcepoint seems a little bit easier.

Deployment can take anywhere from four to five hours. It can take up to two days depending on the infrastructure.

The size of the deployment team can vary. One company could require one admin to check the logs every day and another could need to check only once a week. It depends on the department — DLP is complex.

All of the vendors that I know have the same licensing fee — all of them. The ones that I've used, like Forcepoint, Symantec, and Digital Guardian, all have similar licensing, either perpetual or subscription — it depends on what you want. Do you want only endpoint DLP or do you want a DLP suite? Either way, they do have similar licensing. 

I would certainly recommend this solution to others. It's one of the best DLP solutions on the market.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.

We are mainly using this solution to protect internal documents. It's an internal document creator for the customers.

The most valuable feature is the endpoint DLP. It's specific to copying to the USB or copying to the internal storage in our office.

It's user-friendly and the interface is good.

In terms of display, the support and the Mac platform requires a lot of improvement.

When working with different browsers, we need to upgrade.

Being able to upgrade the agent from the console itself would be great.

I have been using Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention for two years.

It's stable. Forcepoint is a very old product.

It's scalable, but we don't have many requirements to scale it.

We have approximately 50 users in our company.

Technical support is always good with providing a solution and understanding the issues.

They are able to resolve the issue and provide a solution.

Overall, I would say that the support is good.

We moved from Symantec.

The initial setup was not completely straightforward, but not too complex.

The migration takes some time, but that is with any solution.

It took approximately two months to deploy.

The deployment was completed in-house.

Pricing is handled by another department. I don't have any information in this area.

This is a product that I can recommend to others who are interested in using it.

I would suggest evaluating it and do some testing before making a decision. It's a different environment.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.