It controls the inflow and outflow of all the communication between different sites and so on.
We are using its latest version.
It controls the inflow and outflow of all the communication between different sites and so on.
We are using its latest version.
We were looking for the VPN feature and controlling the inflow and outflow of all the traffic within the site and across the sites. We are also using it for the VPN and VLANs.
It can be a little bit more user-friendly in terms of policy definition and implementation. It seems a little bit complicated, and it could be simplified.
When there is a change in the IP address from the ISP, there is some disruption in the service. So, we try to do it when we have the least number of people working, which means very late at night. So, for the time being, it is working fine.
We have been using this solution for nearly a year.
Apart from the disruption in the service because of the IP address change, it has been quite stable.
We are implementing it phase by phase. Initially, we had one VLAN, and then we added more. So, it is quite scalable, and we haven't had issues with it so far. It has been recommended by the vendor that the model that we have would meet our requirements for the time being. In two or three years, depending on how we expand and how many more resources are required, we might have to look at another version of the device.
It was the vendor who did the initial setup. It was done within the time range that was allocated for the setup. My guess is that it was straightforward.
We are still in the process of implementing the solution. The commissioning has not yet been done. What we had previously is now changed to a new solution and a new way of doing things, and this is still in the implementation phase. Our implementation is being done phase-wise. We do things and tune it until we are happy with it, and then we go to the next phase. So far, it's working fine.
We have a relationship with the vendor. We discussed what we wanted to do and finally, we selected the product, and after that, it was installed and configured on our premises.
We have a small team of three or four people for deployment and maintenance.
Its pricing is fine. It is on a yearly basis. Other than the licensing fee, there is no extra fee.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
The use case for this product has to do with security and visibility. When you are inside the business and when there are different departments and branches, it is used for the visibility of some packets. It can also be used for SSL inspections, to check if the SSL is right and that it is not phishing.
The license management is very valuable. You can get a new license each year, or you can enroll every two to four years. You can get the logs, and you will get the information on the risk in your network and the entire organization. With this information, you can take action on your actives, computers, or devices. You can bring your own device as an SSE.
The simplicity of the deployment and the digitization of risk are other valuable features that Fortinet provides.
The cost is low.
The firmware needs improvement because there are bugs when a new release comes through. Sometimes, the configuration changes, and it's a bit harder to see where the fail is. The first time that you have the firmware, it tends to have some issues, and it's better to wait a bit to update the equipment.
All the development of the firmware should be fixed before the update at the page level.
API tokens need to be improved, particularly with regard to integration with other cloud solutions. In other words, proxy flow and API integration need improvement.
.
I haven't had any problem with the stability of the product.
The scalability is good. You can merge other Fortinet products well with this solution.
Technical support has been good.
The initial setup is easy.
The deployment and maintenance can be done by one person.
I did it myself. To create all the policies and configurations needed by the customers, it usually takes me two days or a week at the most if the project is harder.
The price is really low. It's cheap in comparison to the cost of Cisco or CheckPoint, for example.
If you want to get this product, first you must evaluate the number of people who will use it, and then choose the product that will best fit your needs.
I would rate this solution at eight on a scale from one to ten.
We primarily use the solution for security purposes.
Some security features are used for side blocking and antivirus and application control and bandwidth control. These are important for us.
The initial setup is straightforward.
It's a reliable tool.
The product is scalable.
There could be more modifications. Some features are enabled, however, compared to Fortinet, some features are not easy.
Sometimes the dashboard does not open properly. When we add more options, SD-WAN features, and user control features, the opening is very slow. It does not sync properly.
We've used the solution for one or two years.
The solution is stable and quite reliable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.
The solution is scalable. There is no hardware. There are many clients and we have not had any complaints so far in regard to the product.
Technical support is good, however, they do not respond quickly. They respond late. When we log the case, there's no priority with service. You can't get a response, for example, within an hour or two unless you have priority. Cisco, in contrast, divides its services into P1, P2, or P3. That way, if something is recognized as a P1, they get help much faster.
I also work with Cisco. I'm also aware of Palo Alto as an option.
The initial setup is straightforward and not complex. It's easy compared to Palo Alto and a few others.
Our deployment of Fortinet FortiGate took two years.
We are resellers. We are able to handle the setup and deployment.
We are resellers.
The Fortinet 201 and 900 series are very good.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
We are primarily using the solution as a hosted gateway.
The solution is stable and reliable. The performance has been good.
We have found the product to be scalable.
The manageability has been excellent so far.
The initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward.
The product needs to drastically improve its reporting capability. Right now, that is what is lacking. They need to offer monitoring dashboards.
The product should be more user-friendly and attractive. The interface doesn't look as nice as it could.
I've just used the solution for a few months.
The performance has been great. it's stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable.
The scalability is good. If a company needs to expand, it can do so.
We have 80 to 100 people on the solution currently.
Technical support is great. It's already pretty fast.
We did not use a different solution previously.
The implementation process is easy. It's not overly difficult.
The last time we set it up, it took a maximum of 45 minutes to one hour to deploy - apart from the racking. When it is on-prem and I install it in the rack, it’s powered on, then the configuration takes a maximum of 45 minutes.
We only needed one technical person to manage the deployment.
We have a consultant that helps us with setting up the solution. Actually, we have the managed service with them as well.
We have a three-year licensing agreement with FortiGate.
I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I'd advise potential new users that, if they want to use it, they need to plan and design their business case, including what things they want to use and how to publish their application securely. If they can plan ahead, then they will be successful during deployment.
The solution is mostly used for the connection with VPN clients. We use the solution for network security and network segmentation.
It's a flexible solution. The security that it's providing is a valuable aspect of the product.
FortiGate integrates well with other equipment such as FortiSwitch, FortiIB, and more, and delivers one pane of glass for the management of those devices.
It's an easy solution to set up.
Technical support has been good.
The configuration option availability is not 100% from the website of the FortiGate web management site. When we log on to the web interface on FortiGate, we do not have everything under this web solution. If we need some specific configuration or need to do some specific configuration, we need to do additional things on the CLI.
The stability could be a bit better.
I've used the solution for at least the last 12 months.
In terms of stability, there are some areas in which they need to improve. There are different versions and we understand from past implementations which will work best according to our client's needs. The wrong one may not be as stable as they would like.
Some clients may increase usage in the future. FortiGate is fast becoming a very popular solution and its use will likely grow in general.
In general, technical support is helpful. We are quite happy with the level of support on offer.
The solution's initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward. It's not overly complex or difficult.
The length of time it takes to deploy really depends on the size of the project.
While we do assist the client with the implementation, they tend to handle the maintenance on their end.
Typically we, as integrators, will assist the client with the initial setup.
The overall costs are pretty typical. It's not overly cheap or overly expensive.
I work as an integrator and maybe 60% of my work is around FortiGate. My company is a Fortinet partner and integrator.
If companies are thinking about the security of their network, they should consider FortiGate as a gate to the internet. I would highly recommend it to others.
For small or mid-size businesses, I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Fortinet FortiGate is a firewall that protects all network data. We use it as our primary firewall in the office.
The performance is good.
It is easy to use.
I would like to see better pricing in the next release, as well as a simplification of the installation.
I have been working with Fortinet FortiGate for six years.
Fortinet FortiGate is a stable product.
Fortinet FortiGate is a scalable product.
In our company, it is the main gateway for the internet, and we have less than 100 users.
Deployment is faster per user. Each one has a laptop or a PC, as well as a mobile phone, so we have less than 100 devices per user, but with mobile phones and Internet access, that number can rise to more than 100.
I have contacted technical support many times, they are very important and they are very good. They follow up on all of the cases that we have opened.
The response time is great.
They also always have an updated version of the firmware.
I now have UniFi Switches for our WiFi access point. We began using UniFi to replace Cisco Linksys Ethernet switches.
I am also working with QNAPS for network connections.
For virtual meetings, we use Google Meet. Some of our customers use Webex but we mainly work with Google Meet.
In our company, we have Kaspersky, as well as Fortinet.
It's not straightforward. You must have at least the knowledge and the settings. It's not that simple.
The length of time it takes to install is determined by the configuration you have inside. It could take anywhere from 30 minutes to three hours.
In our company, I am responsible for the solution's maintenance and deployment.
We had the assistance of a consultant at first.
Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.
It would be better if it could be made a little less expensive.
It will be more expensive for the first year, then it will gradually decrease by a certain amount per year or something along those lines.
We have the full license that included all of the features and support.
Aside from the licensing fees, there are no other costs.
I would rate Fortinet FortiGate a nine out of ten.
FortiGate covers multiple schemes. I am using the firewall for basic protection. The work console and access console are powerful tools.
I like Fortinet's cloud management. It allows me to manage all my devices in different branches for three cloud accounts. Even though I use on-prem devices, I can manage everything on the cloud.
I would like Fortinet to add more automation to FortiGate.
We've been using FortiGate for six years.
FortiGate is a highly stable system.
FortiGate covers everything we need. Our company has looked into changing our firewall, but I recommended this solution because it meets all our requirements. Currently, we have between 150 to 200 users covered by the platform.
Fortinet technical support is nice.
Setting up FortiGate isn't complicated. I handled the installation myself, but we have two technicians responsible for maintenance.
We have a yearly subscription.
I rate FortiGate eight out of 10. I'm from Egypt, and FortiGate has a vast share of the security market in this country. Fortinet isn't the leader in routing or switching, but they have a nice share in security.
Fortinet FortiGate is being used in our company.
The interface is very good.
There are limited features.
Scalability could be improved.
The issues with the IOS are that they occasionally hang. They are not as reliable as they once were.
When there is an issue with IOS, new updates are introduced, but the updates also have a lot of issues.
Performance and technical support are the main issues with this solution.
When compared to Cisco ISE, the device administration is not very good.
Fortinet is not very good at firewalls when compared to Cisco. Cisco offers full administration control, TripleA, SQT, they use TACACS security protocols, and they have much more control. Cisco's approach is superior.
I have been working with Fortinet FortiGate for four or five years.
This year, we're removing the Fortinet and switching to Cisco ISE to cut security.
There are issues with the stability of this solution.
There are limitations to scalability.
When compared with Cisco, the technical support is not very impressive.
The initial setup is very easy. It is not complex.
When compared to Cisco, it is very easy.
Pricing is lower than Cisco.
Fortinet FortiGate is not a bad option.
I would rate Fortinet FortiGate a five out of ten.
