Git Reviews

We primarily use the solution for version control. We use it to control the development version. We use it for scripts or whatever we are deploying. 

The solution allows for very good version control while coding. We can ignore certain versions and create branches out of exactly what we need. 

The repository is great. We can look into it first before creating versions. 

It works with Unix. 

Once we change things, we can test it locally very easily. 

The initial setup is very easy.

It is stable and reliable.

We have found the solution to be stable.

The pricing is reasonable. 

The solution works perfectly fine so far. For the last year, it hasn't given me issues. 

I've been using the solution for one year. 

It's been stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. I'd rate it eight out of ten. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution can scale well. I'd rate the ability to expand eight out of ten. You can expand it easily. 

Most people are using it in my organization. 

We primarily use GitHub. Now we are using Git for version control. 

The initial setup is very straightforward. It's not complex at all. 

You can pay for a subscription. It is an affordable product. 

I'm an end-user. 

I'd recommend the solution to other users. Both Git and GitHub are very useful for development. 

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. 

We create feature branches with the product for our global development. They merge to create a full request, and we can review and merge the code. 

The version control is quite useful. Each year, we move to a new version to update our code. You can build out branches. 

We are able to do effective incremental work and then push new code remotely. We can resolve merge conflicts.

The setup process is pretty simple.

There is no standard for managing feature branches. While there are branches created, and they can be reviewed before merging, there isn't yet a standardization, which means the team has to follow up.

New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request. They don't necessarily know what to push or if they should be creating feature branches, etc. The should work to make it simpler to use with more standardization to help new users acclimatize faster. 

I've been using the solution for more than five years now. 

The stability is okay. I'd rate it six to seven out of ten. 

The scalability is pretty good. I'd rate it seven out of ten in terms of its ability to expand. 

We have about 50 users or more on the solution right now. 

We don't use technical support. If we run into issues, we turn to forums and deal with the community. We can find the answers we need on Google for the most part. 

We've also used Bitbucket in the past. It has good integration with Jira. I've also used GitHub and GitLab. 

Azure DevOps also allows you to host event repos. However, I have not used it much. 

It's not too complex to set up. The solution is simple to implement. It can differ from project to project. 

We mostly use the free version of the solution. We also use GitLab, which has a licensed version. 

I'm a Git user. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

I use Git for version control. It helps us to distribute development and manage source code. 

The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows. 

I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git. 

I rate the solution's scalability a seven out of ten. My company has eight developers using it. 

I haven't contacted the tool's technical support. 

I would rate my experience with the initial setup of Git as a seven or six out of ten. It has clear documentation and takes one or two hours to deploy. The deployment process involved installing Git, creating a project in Git, and configuring it with administrative privileges. Then, the steps included preparation, conversion, synchronization, and migration. This set up the repository, allowed for safe changes, and enabled inspection of the repository.

I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. 

I can provide support and control over the development teams, such as developing scripts for managing code or administering Git repositories for all members. However, we may need an extra week or two for additional training.

According to my opinion, every programmer should use Git. 

I use the solution for application development.

The product is easy to use.

The price could be improved.

I have been using the solution for almost ten years. I am using the latest version of the solution.

I like the product’s stability. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The tool is scalable. Five people in our company are using the solution. It is not used extensively in our company.

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment took five minutes.

I could deploy the product by myself. I used GitHub Actions for deployment. We need one person to deploy and maintain the product.

The tool is not expensive. I rate the pricing a three or four out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

People should use the solution because it is easy to use. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use Git for our code. 

It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches. 

Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface. 

I have been working the solution for the last three years. 

Git is highly stable and I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

The solution is highly scalable and I would rate it a ten out of ten. My company has 500 users for it. We use it on a daily basis. 

We don't connect with the support team since all the information is available on the internet. 

We switched to Git because it supports multiple vendors. 

Git's setup is easy and I would rate it a nine out of ten. There are documents available with plenty of information. Hence, if there are any issues, you can sort them out. The tool's deployment is fast. 

We did the product's deployment in-house. Users can do it by themselves.

Git is free and you don't have to pay for it. 

I would rate Git a nine out of ten. 

I'm doing little projects to teach myself things and storing them in a Git repository. We have about 20 users at my company. We're open to using it more.

Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use. 

I have used Git for about three years.

I rate Git seven out of 10 for scalability. The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously. 

Git is easy to set up. I've done it multiple times on various systems, and it only takes a few minutes. 

I rate Git eight out of 10. 

I use the solution for website management. 

The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly. 

I have been using the product for ten years. 

I used a version control software called Bazaar. I switched to Git since everyone is using it. 

The tool's setup is straightforward. I could complete the solution's deployment in two minutes. 

The tool is free. 

I would rate the solution a five out of ten. There are better solutions out there than Git. 

We use the product for software development and version control. It helps us to maintain a safe repository of our development. 

Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do. 

The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter. 

I have been working with the solution for seven years. 

The product is stable. 

There is no technical support since we use the open source version. We find support mainly on the forums. 

We use the open source version. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. The product is the best in the industry. 

We use Git for the desktop to maintain some versions of the codebase.

Git is easy to manage, which is one of the main features. Also, the codebase is a major feature. It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production. So we manage the versioning of codebases.

The price is an area that needs improvement.

The process of raising a pull request could benefit from some improvement. Currently, when a pull request is created in an organization, a branch is also created. However, each pull request must be individualized to a specific branch. If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue. Therefore, it would be beneficial if pull requests were individualized to each user so that any modifications made are attributed to the specific user's pull request.

I have been using Git for a year. Also, I don't remember the version of the solution I am using.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

The solution's initial setup process was easy. It is also easy to get the data. So, even though there are a large number of files, it's easy to clone and get the data details and codebase easily.

The organization looks into the pricing aspects of the solution.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

Git is used for version control.

Our extensive IT department collaborates on various projects, utilizing Git to manage versions effectively. One significant advantage is the ability to maintain multiple versions of the same code, even when offline. This is particularly beneficial in scenarios where internet connectivity is not available, enabling individuals to work on their code seamlessly. Ultimately, this is a crucial benefit for our team's productivity and market competitiveness.

All of the features in Git are useful.

The solution could improve by having more customization.

I have been using Git for a few years.

The stability is good.

I rate the stability of Git a ten out of ten.

We have approximately 500 people using the solution.

The solution is scalable.

I have not used the support.

I have used solutions prior to Git.

The setup of Git is straightforward. The time it takes to set up depends on the size of the project.

When we're doing things manually, but now we use automation tools. When there is a request made it is automated and deployed in the project.

We did the implementation in-house. We have a team that handles the implementation.

A few people in each team have to do the maintenance of the solution.

I would recommend people start using Git. Users can work on an offline copy without internet connectivity and later sync their changes once online. This process is effortless and speedy. Additionally, it is highly secure. After setting up an Azure account, integration with other tools is possible, allowing for continuous integration and deployment.

I rate Git out of ten.