Git Reviews

Version control and repository management are the main use cases for Git.

The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code. It's a client-side tool that we install in our local company and connect to the cloud product for use cases.

It should be more user-friendly. Git provides important commands for projects. It's not very user-friendly, but it's okay.

I have been using this solution for one year. We're using the test version. It's integrated with TSS.

There are 50-60 users in my company. We use it based on the use case.

It's straightforward. It takes around ten to fifteen minutes to set up.

The deployment can be done in-house. The deployment process is good but there may be a learning curve for some users. However, it could benefit from additional hands-on experience, particularly for enterprise-level usage.

Overall, I would rate it a seven out of ten. I prefer using other tools that are more user-friendly.

The primary use case is to keep track of changes and maintain control, and it helps contain your code and is useful for collaboration.

One feature I find valuable is that it's a one-shot solution. Also, every software company has a requirement to use Git.

I am trying to understand why they removed the credential because it has been a great feature. But yeah, that's not looking good on me. Moreover, Git should increase security to reduce risk. 

Another improvement could be that it is easy to install but complex to set up.

I have been using this solution for ten years. We always use the latest version in our company.

It is a stable solution that has been fine for me for ten years.

I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Everyone can use it, and there are over 200 uses in my company.

The initial setup is a bit complex because it is open source.

We deployed it from some commands, which took just a few seconds. It's open source, so there is no need for a consultant.

Many tutorials are available online, and one should search for them and go through them before doing anything.

Overall, I would rate it a ten out of ten.

We use Git for version control for programs. 

To have programming projects and keeping track of the copays is always it's always nice to have to be able to reverse changes if they don't work.

I am doing my CV and I am also tracking it with GIt.

I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change.

The program is run from your shell and I am comfortable with that.

You have Git Lab as a platform, which is just Git with a web interface. I believe that is already well integrated.

More security is always welcome in my opinion.

I have been working with Git for two years. I use it occasionally.

I am working with the most recent version.

I would rate the stability of Git a ten out of ten.

In my opinion, Git is a scalable solution.

It is used for Linux, which I believe is the largest open-source project we have running right now.

I don't believe they offer technical support.

I have used Confluence and Jira from Atlassian.

The initial setup is straightforward. You initialize the repo in your code base, and you start committing changes.

It doesn't take very long to deploy it, a few seconds. It's a single connection.

It can be deployed by anyone who is using it.

Git is completely free.

I would definitely recommend using Git.

My advice to others is that it is a good idea to read the manual.

I would rate Git a ten out of ten.

I am an engineer and I am using Git for research. I follow the event issues that can take place.

The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity.

If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful.

I have been using Git for approximately three years.

The stability of Git is good.

We have approximately 500 users using this solution in my company.

I have not used the technical support of the solution.

I have not used similar solutions to Git.

There is no installation for the solution because it is cloud-based.

I would recommend this solution to others. It is popular.

I rate Git an eight out of ten.

We use this solution to assist with our development.

We are using the on-premise deployment model, with Git installed on our server.

The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality.

The GUI needs to be improved.

We have been using this solution for ten years.

The stability of this solution is very good.

For our use, scalability is not a problem.

We do not have a very complicated installation, with fifteen users. We do not plan to increase usage at the moment.

I have never used technical support, although support online is good. We have solved our technical issues by looking on the internet.

We did use another solution before this one but switched because Git was a better product.

The initial setup for this solution is complex. Specifically, it is difficult for the average user to configure. One person is enough to handle the maintenance.

We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge.

We did not evaluate other options before choosing this one.

We are satisfied with this product, but updates to the interface would improve usability.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

Git can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise.

The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily.

Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents.

I have been using Git for approximately five years.

Git is stable.

The scalability of Git is good.

We have only developed using this solution in my company.

I rate the support from Git a three out of five.

Neutral

We use another solution prior to Git.

Git is not simple to set up.

We did the implementation of Git in-house.

We did not evaluate other solutions.

We have one person that does the maintenance of the solution that accesses the cloud services.

I rate Git a ten out of ten.