Git Reviews

We use the tool to store codes. 

Our team members can work together and save the code in a single repository. 

The product needs to improve its UI. 

I am using the tool for four to five years. 

The product is stable. 

My company has more than 1000 users for the solution. 

The software's technical support is good. 

Positive

The product's initial setup is easy. 

The tool is an open-source product. 

I would rate the product a ten out of ten. 

The most used case for it is managing code versions when working on a project with many developers. After we merge it, the dash is merged in the master dash. Next, when we merge its branch to replace it with the master and resolve conflicts, we collaborate to finish the project.

Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work.

About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved.

I have been using the solution for the last two years.

It is a stable solution. Never faced any bugs or glitches. I rate the stability of the solution an eight out of ten.

It is not a very scalable solution. It is not a good experience to manage large scalable products. I have moderate experience in managing large projects on Git. One thousand users are using the solution regularly. I rate the scalability of the solution a seven out of ten.

The initial setup of Git can be difficult but once you master the solution it is a useful tool and works on many difficulties by rapidly completing the task.

I advice everyone to learn about Git as it is a very useful solution and help in working on projects more rapidly which otherwise would have taken time. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

I use Git mainly to create new reports to store my project and to keep track of the changes I made in my code. So these are the main reasons why all people use Git.

I did use it in my organization as well. I did use it personally, but it was very easy to use it by yourself, especially when you create and upload your code, it's easy. If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated. So, when I started using it in my organization, It was a bit messy, but I finally got it.

Speaking about features, it helps to keep track of your code if it changes, especially to find who made the changes. The solution also makes it easy for other people to change your code.

I don't think it does need any improvement for now since Git is a free, open-source project.

To be honest, I didn't even get close to seeing all its current features. So, I can't imagine any new features that I would be able to recommend.

If it was possible to pay for a Git solution, I would pay for it. However, it's difficult in my country. So I mainly enjoy the free solution.

I have been using Git for four years. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I don't think that it is even possible to count it as a scalable tool.

I never tried to reach tech support.

GitHub and GitLab were pretty good repositories for Git servers. So, I was using the solution on the cloud.

I did not deploy it. I was using already deployed solutions like GitLab and GitHub. I never did even try to deploy it.

I think it's a good investment, but I'm using the free version of the solution.

My recommendation to others to use the solution would depend on their usage. If it's for their personal use, it's going to be easy. But if he was going to use it in an organization or for a personal project with a lot of friends or colleagues, then that would be a different story. You need to be concentrated, and I think a lot before making any changes to the code because every mistake can create a lot of problems.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

I use the solution for website management. 

The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly. 

I have been using the product for ten years. 

I used a version control software called Bazaar. I switched to Git since everyone is using it. 

The tool's setup is straightforward. I could complete the solution's deployment in two minutes. 

The tool is free. 

I would rate the solution a five out of ten. There are better solutions out there than Git. 

We use Git for the desktop to maintain some versions of the codebase.

Git is easy to manage, which is one of the main features. Also, the codebase is a major feature. It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production. So we manage the versioning of codebases.

The price is an area that needs improvement.

The process of raising a pull request could benefit from some improvement. Currently, when a pull request is created in an organization, a branch is also created. However, each pull request must be individualized to a specific branch. If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue. Therefore, it would be beneficial if pull requests were individualized to each user so that any modifications made are attributed to the specific user's pull request.

I have been using Git for a year. Also, I don't remember the version of the solution I am using.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

The solution's initial setup process was easy. It is also easy to get the data. So, even though there are a large number of files, it's easy to clone and get the data details and codebase easily.

The organization looks into the pricing aspects of the solution.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

I use Git to manage my personal projects involving web basics, web design, and web pages. I am able to clone most things using Git.

I use it for web design version control. I also conduct a lot of research on open-source technologies that we can install using Git.

I have discovered that most of the solutions offered on Git can also be found on Docker.

It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace.

Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications.

I have no problems with Git and prefer using the Terminal Point of View for its high speed.

I attempted to use an alternative user interface, but it was too sluggish for me. I discovered that the Terminal is more efficient and rapid for executing events on Linux and Ubuntu. Its swiftness in event deployment is remarkable.

I have been working with Git for three or four years.

I update the versions every now and then.

I would rate the stability of Git a nine out of ten.

Performing periodic updates can be time-consuming, but it is not a significant concern as it doesn't disrupt my schedule. However, I do need to make a conscious effort to initiate the updates.

Git is a scalable solution.

Another advantage is that any team can work on it effortlessly, even large teams, making it highly collaborative.

I am currently using it and there are only a few people who I would like to share my changes with. With the current capability to view the modifications I have made, I am able to open it and see the updates for my team.

I am not planning to increase my usage at this time.

I have not contacted technical support.

Ever since I began my training in web and development, it was the easiest platform for me to use and was the only one that was introduced. I did not explore others.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The deployment process was quick for me. I was able to execute it on my personal computer and also clone it to my personal Git account.

I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. 

We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version.

I highly recommend others use Git for version control.

Because of its version control, I would rate Git a ten out of ten.

We are using Git for development. We are cloning the code, pushing code, and raising pull requests. We use it for the typical Git workflow for development.

The solution has improved our company because I no longer have to copy the code on my own and keep it in a safe folder. This solution is organized and it's very useful in a team.

The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good.

Git could improve the merge conflicts. 

In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive.

I have been using Git for approximately three years.

Git is highly stable.

I have not used the support from Git.

I have not used a similar tool prior to Git.

There is only an online deployment of Git and it belongs to Microsoft.

We have received a return on investment using this solution.

There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case.

My advice to others is Git is the industry standard for source code versioning and my recommendation for them is to learn it and use it.

I rate Git a nine out of ten.

I use the solution for process control and issue management.

The product protects our data. The solution allows us to have both public and private repositories. The product is integrated with other solutions.

The solution could be more user-friendly. Sometimes, I feel lost while using the dashboard.

I have been using the solution since 2016.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

Less than ten people are using the product in our organization.

The initial setup is not complex.

The deployment can be done in-house. We need one administrator and one developer to maintain and deploy the solution.

The product is mostly used by developers and DevOps teams. Bitbucket is more user-friendly than GitHub. If we have a GitHub account, we can invite users. People wanting to use the product should use the free version and understand the features well before buying the licensed version. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.