IBM DevOps Test UI offers robust automation testing features that support .NET and Java scripting. It integrates with IBM Rational Performance Tester and supports various applications, making regression testing and automation efficient.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM DevOps Test UI | 1.6% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 10.1% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 6.8% |
| Other | 81.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
IBM DevOps Test UI provides powerful object identification and third-party library integration. It adapts well to automation testing needs and integrates with testing management tools, including compatibility with Siebel, SAP, and more. Users perceive it as easy to implement and highly compatible with technology stacks, enabling enhanced automation efficiency. While improvements are needed in mobile app UI analysis and Linux application compatibility, it remains a strong choice for teams focused on automation testing.
What features make IBM DevOps Test UI stand out?IBM DevOps Test UI is employed extensively for website functionality testing and database integration. Entities within banking and telecom sectors frequently use it for test automation and data creation, often pairing it with IBM Rational Functional Tester to effectively meet testing demands.
IBM DevOps Test UI was previously known as IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Edumate
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada | 4.0 | I use IBM Rational Functional Tester for test automation, which saves time and provides accurate results. Its stability is good, and support is helpful. However, I find the latest version has increased load times. |
| Associate Vice President at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 2.5 | I found IBM Rational Functional Tester contextual and compatible, but it's now outdated and needs a complete revamp for non-technical users. With better open-source alternatives available, I no longer recommend RFT, suggesting RPT instead. |
| CEO at Xcelliti | 4.0 | I find IBM Rational Functional Tester stable, scalable, and compatible with various applications. Setup was simple, and support is great. My main concerns are Linux compatibility issues and the expensive licensing. I rate it 8/10, recommending evaluation first. |
| Test Specialist at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees | 3.5 | I use IBM RFT for website UI testing, valuing its component tester. Its stability is okay, but setup is complex. My main concern is its lack of mobile app support, which is crucial as my products move to mobile. |
| Test Team Lead at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees | 3.5 | I find IBM RFT easy to use, stable, and it offers good object recognition compared to QTP. However, the object repository needs improvement as it sometimes fails to identify objects, requiring manual effort. |
| Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I find IBM RFT excellent for functional testing of thick client applications. Its robust API, descriptive programming, fast execution, and object identification make it a lightweight and cost-effective solution compared to others. |
| Software Engineering Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I've used this product for over four years, automating regression and saving 1200 hours annually. While setup was easy, I experienced crashes and seek better integration with test management tools and more browser support. |
| Technical Lead - QA at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 3.5 | I find this stable tool supports Siebel/SAP, handles volume, and has good tech support. Installation is easy. While reports are poor and it has memory issues, I recommend it as a cheaper, effective Worksoft Certify replacement. |
