IBM MaaS360 Reviews

We have provided IBM MaaS360 to all of our mobile users, approximately one year ago. I have also been working to reseller IBM services, such as this one, for almost the past two years.

This product is primarily used for data loss prevention (DLP).

Using this solution has made things more convenient. Earlier, we had to depend a lot more on IT to find and resolve our issues. There are fewer problems and once you raise a ticket, it's easier for them to identify whether it's something that they can fix remotely, or whether it would require a physical examination of the device.

The most valuable features are remote enablement and access to my intranet resources, without depending on the VPN.

Due to integration with Apple DEP and Android Enterprise we don't need to configure each device manually or even share a link, it is ready the moment the user has access to the device.

We also have some internal websites that would normally need VPN to access from the public network, but we have set up a gateway that lets us connect to these internal resources  using the secure browser that's part of the license which is a very significant cost saving in the current times.

The user interface could definitely use some improvement. It's good enough, albeit pretty basic. However, anybody that is not used to it might require some assistance early on because it is not very intuitive.

It is fairly simple to use, yet a little complex to manage. At least, the initial setup is complex to manage.

One of the things that I would like to see in the next release is improvements at the account level. it is a little bit difficult to identify the number of licenses that are visible in my account, and to which suite each belongs. If there are four suites, we sometimes have to have segregation. Some users require the full set of enterprise services, whereas some users who are our partners or just employees are just given basic inventory management tools.

Being able to identify and account for these licenses would definitely help. This is not related to the actual usage, but rather, it's more of an administrative task. It can be overcome with manual bookkeeping but still, a bit more effort would be needed. If this can be simplified then that would be great.

I have been working with IBM MaaS360 for close to two years.

This is a pretty stable product and I haven't seen it crash anytime recently.

My organization has 5,000 devices as of now, so I don't see a problem with scale. I have personally resold the same services to organizations that use as little as 10 devices to 100 devices, to more than 10,000 devices. Scalability is not a real challenge.

There are two aspects to technical support. Since I am a reseller,  I provide my own service along with the licenses, so I charge for the professional services. However, if it is purely through IBM, the service is definitely lacking.

With IBM, it is a significant turnout time and you do need to have someone with qualifications from your own team so that you understand what to do. So, unless you already have somebody who's tech-savvy and understands the language, you're better off hiring professional services for support.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's clicking a link and moving on.

Our deployment took roughly a month because it happened in phases. There was integration, phasing out of the old software, and integration with the new upcoming cloud services. Aside from knowing that there were phases, I don't have specifics on how long each one took.

My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to start by completing the trial as soon as possible so that all of your core issues or core requirements can be identified easily. Next, have all of the integration options kept as secondary because you don't want to do everything together. It's always best to test a few cases; create a test group, and test it on them first. Make sure that everything is working instead of trying to make a turnkey solution. Doing it in phases is more effective than trying to do everything at once.

Overall, this is a good product and it covers most of the services that these solutions are supposed to follow, but it's not perfect. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use IBM MaaS360 for the iPads of our field sales reps. We use it to ensure that they are only using authorized apps, and these apps are maintained and have the latest version.

The ability to send an iPad out to someone and have them auto-provision it when they are out in the field is fantastic. We don't have to have it all configured before we ship it. This is probably the biggest value add.

We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment.

Our company was founded in May of last year, and we launched our sales force in September of last year. We have been using IBM MaaS360 since then, that is, for more than a year. We are using the latest version.

It is stable.

It is scalable for the field sales reps. It didn't seem to be as scalable for the enterprise across multiple platforms. We have around 70 users.

We have IBM MaaS360 for our iPads, but we are using Microsoft Intune for our laptops and our BYODs. When our licensing expires, we will migrate our iPads from IBM MaaS360 to Microsoft Intune. 

Considering that we are moving to Microsoft Intune, I should ideally not recommend this solution, but there's no reason to not recommend it for the iPads of your sales force. It is a very standard solution. There is lots of knowledge out there and lots of resources who are experts in the solution. It is not a bad solution to use. If I had just the sales force, using IBM MaaS360 is a great way to manage their iPads.

I would rate IBM MaaS360 an eight out of ten.

The primary use case for us is to bring down enrollment and to make it more flexible for the company. The solution is good for small to large enterprise organizations. We have 100,000 devices that have the solution installed. I'm an engineer. 

I really value the ease of implementation. Within a couple of days you can quickly roll out several hundred devices. We didn't need more than that, but I'm convinced that it's possible and that it wouldn't matter if the device is not an iOS or a Windows 10 device. Those operating systems are possible and available within MaaS. The product provides basic security and when you need more, it's fairly easy to bring that in with third parties or a single sign-on MFA. That kind of thing is in place and available for the company.

The interface is very user-friendly. You just click and go. It's quite different from something you would get on Intune. I don't like that interface, the Microsoft interface is more suited to technical people. 

Sometimes I would like to have local support because a company that provides 24/7 support means that the technical support staff are not always fluent English speakers. My English is  not fluent, but it's better to have an English speaker. It's sometimes hard to make yourself understood. We are looking at that now with the single sign-on and MFA, but that's been fairly smooth. 

I've been using this solution for four years. 

In the last four, five years, it's never failed and I've never had a problem. It was always there. When there are new releases from iOS or something, we implement. I've never experienced downtime problems whatsoever. 

The solution is scalable, it works from anything and up to 100,000. That's scalable enough for me. I know two companies who have more than 100,000 devices. It's also worldwide. One environment works worldwide. Employees are working worldwide around the globe and are connected to MaaS360 on all their devices. Our specific organization has about 3,000 users and we are expanding the number of devices.

The technical support is 24/7, 365 days a year. Sometimes you get the answer fairly quickly. Sometimes it needs more of a description or more searching for the right answer. I think that also depends on the case itself. Integration of lots of other products like ERP systems or CRM systems is very easy. 

We tried some other solutions, but they weren't so flexible and also there was not a real unified endpoint management. You could only do, say, smartphones and tablets, no laptops or desktops. I have some minimal experience with Intune which has a very different user interface. The Intune unified endpoint management is really based on Microsoft products. When you want to put in apps other than Microsoft, you have to do a few things beforehand. That's not the case with the MaaS. It doesn't matter what sort of apps you want. It's all perfect.

ROI depends on the price and also on the organization. When you have an organization with a lot of problems and a lot of devices to be enrolled when there is nothing in place, then I would say you get the ROI in three months. When you don't have it, when you already have something in place, the return on investment could be all right. What we see is that the return of investment comes easily when you start from nothing.

I think pricing is very good at the moment. I don't know all the pricing of all the products in the market, of course, but it's reasonable, and depending on the amount of devices it can be cheaper. What I also like is that there is no vendor lock-in. I'm not pushed to use all the products of the same vendor. It's an open product, it's an open platform. I like that.

I would recommend trying this product it because it's easy to start. You will be surprised at the possibilities, the flexibility and the opportunities within MaaS360.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

We use the product for mobile devices. 

The tool's most valuable features are application, distribution, and security. It helps to block user access. 

The product needs to improve tech support. 

I have been working with the product for three years. 

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

I rate IBM MaaS360's scalability  a nine out of ten. My company has 2000 users. 

The tool's deployment is straightforward. 

IBM MaaS360 is worth its money. 

I rate IBM MaaS360's pricing a six out of ten. 

I rate the overall product a nine out of ten. 

We use IBM MaaS360 for email containerization and securing corporate data.

The product’s most valuable feature is email, browser, and application security.

IBM MaaS360’s threat management feature needs improvement. It could identify even more malicious attacks. Additionally, it should support other platforms, including Linux.

We have been using IBM MaaS360 for eight years.

It is a stable product. I rate its stability a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable product and suitable for enterprises. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.

The technical support services need improvement in terms of response time.

Neutral

I rate the initial setup process an eight out of ten. It is deployed on the cloud. The deployment time depends on the number of devices. It takes approximately 25 days to complete.

I rate IBM MaaS360’s pricing a six out of ten.

The product is easy to use and has efficient UI features. I rate it an eight out of ten.

The most valuable feature of the solution is policy implementation.

Sometimes IBM MaaS360 seems buggy. The buggy nature of the solution is the first impression it gives out due to some mismatches in the solution, though in the background, it really works. At first, the tool may not look so efficient, but it is quite efficient in reality. The aforementioned area of concern can be considered for improvement.

In the future, I would like to see better integration capabilities in IBM MaaS360 that allow it to integrate with productivity software from Microsoft.

I have been using IBM MaaS360 for more than three years. My company has a partnership with IBM.

The solution's technical support functions quite well and can be described as average. The solution's technical support team is sometimes slow to respond and not competent enough. I rate the technical support a six out of ten.

Neutral

The implementation phase of IBM MaaS360 was pretty easy. One must clearly understand how MDM solutions work and whether it is valid for all the platforms in the environment.

I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.

I am using the latest version.

For the moment, we utilize the solution solely for iPads, although we also meet the requirements to satisfy our desire to use it for laptops. There are plans for its use with BYOD and for Intunes. The feasibility and cost per user is worthy of examination. 

Overall, the solution is good, although I have not conducted a detailed examination of it. This said, I feel the pricing to be very high.

I have been using IBM MaaS360 for a long time, probably five or six years. 

The solution is quite stable. 

The solution is scalable. 

The solution's technical support is okay. 

The initial setup is not complex. 

The price could be lower. It is excessively high. 

While the solution is currently deployed on-premises, we have plans to move to the cloud, which is why we plan to go with Intune. 

We have a partnership with the vendors. 

While I feel the solution to be fine, better ones do exist, Intunes, for examples, which, features aside, is quite similar. 

I rate IBM MaaS360 as an eight out of ten. 

We have a few use cases. Firstly, we are using the solution for incorporating the licenses. We also use it for smaller devices or to allow an inventory of devices to have access.

We also use the solution for our stores in our business. We need to protect our information while being able to deploy apps and business applications, specifically for our departments.

The most important aspect of the solution is the fact that the platform is unified, and that it covers all the mobility services - that includes not only the MDM components or services. The solution includes mobile application management in order to have an application catalog, which is very helpful. In this catalog, we can synchronize and install applications with ease. Within the MDM component, there's mobile set management, in order to incorporate security. 

The deployment itself was quite easy.

The stability has been very reliable.

We've found the scalability to be very good.

The price of the solution is quite good.

We've found the interface to be pretty good overall. The dashboards are quite good.

You can customize the solution easily.

The main issue we have with the solution is synchronization between the information and between the devices and the portal. The information that we see in the portal sometimes does not reflect, or not show, the real-time situation.

The user experience really isn't so good. It's important that they work to improve this aspect.

I've been using the solution for three years, more or less. It's been a while.

The stability of the solution is excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is very good.

The scalability is good. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so. It's not a problem.

Currently, in our organization, we have 4,000 people, more or less, that use the product. 

We have two models for support. Normally, it falls to the internal department, which manages the support with the IBM products.

However, it's difficult to add new features or to improve anything as there are so many departments around the world. Occasionally, IBM will ask for logs that they want to or need to review, and that can be difficult.

The initial setup was not complex. It was pretty straightforward. A company shouldn't have any issue with the process.

The licensing is paid yearly. We find the pricing to be reasonable. It's not too expensive.

We are an IBM partner.

We are using the latest version of the solution at this time. I'm unsure of the exact version number.

We have the service model, which is very useful to us.

I'd recommend the solution to other companies. There are similar solutions, however. One might be better at this while another is better at that. 

In general, I would rate the solution eight out of ten.