


IBM MaaS360 and Sophos Mobile are both competitive mobile management solutions. IBM MaaS360 seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while Sophos Mobile stands out in robust features and advanced security options.
Features: IBM MaaS360 excels in security features, device management, and integration with various platforms. Sophos Mobile is praised for its comprehensive suite of security tools, including malware protection and seamless cross-platform functionality. Despite both being feature-rich, Sophos Mobile's advanced security options give it an edge.
Room for Improvement: Users of IBM MaaS360 report issues with occasional system lag and a somewhat steep learning curve for new users. For Sophos Mobile, feedback points to the need for improved reporting capabilities and better interoperability with certain third-party applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM MaaS360 receives favorable reviews for ease of initial setup, with many users commending the straightforward deployment process. Their customer service is also well-regarded. Conversely, Sophos Mobile's deployment process is seen as more complex, though their customer service receives high marks for responsiveness and helpfulness.
Pricing and ROI: Users find IBM MaaS360 to be more affordable initially, with lower setup costs and a satisfactory return on investment. Sophos Mobile, while priced higher, is deemed worth the cost due to its superior features and security capabilities.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
With Microsoft Intune, tasks such as device provisioning, policy deployment, application delivery, and compliance enforcement require less manual effort than in more traditional management models.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
IBM's support and technical service were helpful when needed.
In terms of responsiveness, they handle the calls immediately and efficiently.
The technical support for Sophos Mobile requires improvement.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
We recommend it for both small and medium-sized enterprises.
It could scale better to meet diverse client needs.
At an enterprise level with more requirements, there is room for improvement.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
In my experience, Microsoft Intune is a stable platform as it is a cloud-based service, and updates are regularly delivered by Microsoft.
Sophos is stable, and the product works well.
I would rate the stability of Sophos Mobile as a seven out of ten.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
It would be beneficial to have the VPN feature incorporated into Sophos Mobile, even if it requires separate payment.
I also believe the portal itself requires improvements because the interface can be difficult to understand sometimes.
Regarding functionality, I think an area Sophos Mobile can actually improve is by infusing more AI-integrated services and solutions into the product.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
The pricing and licensing experience with IBM MaaS360 was satisfactory and not expensive.
The product is affordable, and there is no issue with its purchase for small companies.
In terms of pricing, Sophos Mobile is favorable compared to other mobile device security solutions.
The pricing of Sophos Mobile is high compared to the market, specifically 40% higher.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
The main benefit of IBM MaaS360 is phone control and rollout.
Sophos Mobile has been rated nine out of ten for security and performance.
The features that stand out for maintaining mobile security are compliance and the ability to install applications and configure work profiles.
Sophos Mobile provides fantastic management and control along with web application control capabilities on mobile, features that would usually be on a firewall at the perimeter of the business or the organization.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 22.3% |
| IBM MaaS360 | 7.7% |
| Sophos Mobile | 2.4% |
| Other | 67.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 151 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 60 |
| Large Enterprise | 177 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
IBM MaaS360 enhances mobile device management with tracking, security, app deployment, policy management, and integration with Apple DEP and Android Enterprise. It supports remote control, cost efficiency, and is user-friendly, suitable for both corporate and BYOD environments.
MaaS360 offers a comprehensive suite for managing and securing mobile devices. With features like encryption, passcode enforcement, and containerization, it ensures data security and compliance. MaaS360 simplifies app deployment via distribution groups and integrates seamlessly with Apple and Android systems. Its focus on kiosk mode, application security, and automated provisioning make it a strategic choice for companies prioritizing a robust endpoint management strategy. Though it offers extensive options, improvements in notifications, user management, and Microsoft integration are needed.
What are the most important features of IBM MaaS360?IBM MaaS360 finds applications in industries needing robust mobile device management and security. Enterprises deploy it widely to ensure compliance and safeguard corporate data, providing application control, data leak prevention, and secure email management. It is used for configuring policies for field staff and enabling efficient device enrollment, significantly cutting initial setup costs.
Sophos Mobile offers multifaceted mobile management and security, integrating threat detection, cloud management, and centralized control, providing robust solutions for device compliance and protection. Known for its remote management and user-centric interface, it enhances corporate network integration.
Delivering a comprehensive suite, Sophos Mobile ensures secure device management with features like remote data wiping, phishing management, and Intercept X capabilities. It empowers organizations to manage antivirus solutions remotely, enforce custom network policies, and monitor app usage efficiently. Its ability to integrate with synchronized security components addresses the growing demand for enhanced security. While known for its security and user-friendly design, Sophos Mobile seeks improvement in setup simplicity and cross-platform compatibility.
What are the key features of Sophos Mobile?In industries like healthcare and finance, Sophos Mobile is deployed to manage mobile endpoints securely. By creating separate work profiles and preventing unauthorized app installations, companies ensure compliance and data protection. Locking, tracking, and remote wiping capabilities protect sensitive data in case of device loss, while policy control and enrollment ease enhance operational efficiency.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.