Ivanti Avalanche Reviews

Ivanti Avalanche's pricing is considered reasonable by enterprise users, but some believe it could be more affordable. The standard licensing fee covers most costs, and licenses must be purchased for each device, with pricing based on assets. Opinions on cost vary, rating between six to seven out of ten in terms of expense. Generally, the price is viewed as fair for its functionalities. Users pay on a yearly basis.

• "The license is based on assets. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
• "You will need to purchase licenses for each device."
• "Although the solution is a bit costly in my opinion, for customers who really need this solution, Ivanti Avalanche is worth it."

Integrators use Ivanti Avalanche primarily for managing Windows CE devices in the contexts of warehousing, logistics, and other key areas such as transport, production, and utilities. They implement it for managing barcode scanners, barcode printers, mobile devices, and performing software updates and file transfers. It is also utilized for remote control of devices and pushing packages to all production devices simultaneously.

The setup of Ivanti Avalanche is straightforward, with quick installation and implementation. Users received strong support from Ivanti technicians, making configuration easy. Although some required two people for deployment, others faced few challenges if they understood the structure. Deployment durations varied, with some completing it in a few days, while others took six months. Experiences ranged from positive impressions, rating it seven out of ten, to those who rated it a six due to some difficulties.

Ivanti Avalanche is noted for its strong scalability, easily managed due to low resource consumption. Users rate its scalability highly, appreciating its ability to handle multiple tasks and create various policies efficiently. Many find it easy to increase its usage within their organizations.

Ivanti Avalanche is noted for its excellent stability. Users rate its stability highly, often giving it nine or ten out of ten. They describe the tool as very good and reliable in this regard. Users emphasize its consistency and high performance without issues.