The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. It's very easy to manage agents.
Technical Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Easy to manage but needs to upgrade some features
Pros and Cons
- "The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator."
- "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade the technology; it's like their area function is not quite as good as compared to other market vendors."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade the technology; it's like their area function is not quite as good as compared to other market vendors. So they have to work on it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I am not using it, but I know the capabilities of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. I work for a security integration company that sells OEMs in terms of endpoint security, including McAfee and other solutions.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the solution is good. I would rate it a seven out of ten.
Buyer's Guide
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate scalability an eight out of ten. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
I had some technical issues, which were not known by the vendor itself.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is neither easy nor difficult, and I would rate it a five out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator a six out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Technical Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
A scalable solution that needs to improve the EDR functionality it provides to its users
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's best part is that it is very easy to manage McAfee Agent."
- "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade its technology since the solution's EDR function is not good compared to other vendors in the market."
What is most valuable?
The solution's best part is that it is very easy to manage McAfee Agent.
What needs improvement?
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade its technology since the solution's EDR function is not good compared to other vendors in the market.
For how long have I used the solution?
I use McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, and my experience with it has been good. Though I am not using it full-fledged, I know the solution's capabilities. So, I work in a security integrator company that sells OEMs for endpoint security. So, we don't just sell McAfee, but also other solutions. My company has a partnership with McAfee.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution's stability is good, and so I rate its stability a seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution's scalability is good. So, I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
Technical products are bound to get stuck due to the technical processes involved. Sometimes, certain new issues crop up in the solution, and even the vendor does not know about it. Owing to the aforementioned reasons, I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
I rate the solution's initial setup a five out of ten since it was neither easy nor difficult.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the solution a six and a half out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cyber Security Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Useful tool to detect any pattern, and one can add or remove any servers as required
Pros and Cons
- "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern."
- "I would like to see McAfee reduce the amount of manual work required."
What is our primary use case?
We use McAfee to detect patterns. For example, if we detect credit cards, we can use the advanced pattern.
To maintain the solution, we require two individuals that are knowledgeable in SQL and DLP.
What is most valuable?
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern.
What needs improvement?
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator requires a lot of manual work. For example, if you use Symantec DLP, only one policy is needed, and you can apply it to all of the channels that are an endpoint, like the web or email. With McAfee, you need to create separate rules for all of those channels. One policy for email, one policy for web, and so on. I would like to see McAfee reduce the amount of manual work required.
In the next release, I would like to see an integration with third-party solutions for classification. We find that implementation is limited for some products. I would like an open API that we can integrate with other classification tools.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator for two months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of McAfee is user-friendly and stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. You can add and remove servers as required.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward, not complex.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was done by me within a test environment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We are using a free trial version of McAfee ePolicy.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2026
Product Categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Sentinel
IBM Security QRadar
Elastic Security
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Splunk SOAR
CRITICALSTART
Buyer's Guide
Download our free McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How easy is it to integrate Microsoft Intune with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator?
- Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?
- What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?
- What is the difference between SIEM and SOAR platforms?
- What is an incident response playbook and how is it used in SOAR?
- What are the latest trends in Security Operations Center (SOC)?
- What tools and solutions do you use for automated incident response in an enterprise in 2022?
- How to evaluate SIEM detection rules?
- Why a Security Operations Center (SOC) is important?
- What types of Security Operations Center (SOC) deployment models do exist?







