Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Reviews

We use the solution for data storage.

The product is easy to use, and anybody can easily migrate to advanced DB.

Adding more transformations and plugins to the solution is very important.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics for 10 years.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven to eight out of ten.

Around 20 to 30 users, including developers and architecture engineers, regularly use the solution for migration purposes. For a small organization, fewer people would be required for the migration.

I rate the solution a seven to eight out of ten for scalability.

The solution provides good technical support. The support team's response time depends on the issue's criticality. They will call you back in two or three hours if the severity is high. If the severity is low, they will take more than 24 hours.

Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is a moderately priced solution. We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you get help from partners, it will be expensive for you.

Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is a cloud-based solution. Since we are migrating, the cost is high. We assume the cost will be reduced post-migration, increasing the company's profitability. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics will be more profitable for any company in the long run. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our data is available on-premises, so we are extracting the data from our private on-premises servers and Azure databases.

I like SQL post, which is for storage and distributed computing. Another good feature is the copy activity.

Synapse Analytics needs to develop an automation framework because now you have to build a cache yourself. You have to build a pipeline in WhereScape, which does end-to-end pipeline automation well. 

Microsoft should come up with a framework to save people time. If they developed a tool like WhereScape, it would dramatically reduce development time.

I'm waiting for Microsoft to implement a feature that automatically detects and processes the copy activity. That feature is available in Databricks, but I hope they will add it to Synapse Analytics' data factory integration run-time.

I've been using Synapse Analytics for two or three years.

Synapse Analytics is stable because the scope is so broad. Anything you do in it is like 1 percent of the total solution.

Scalability is built in. You don't need to do anything. If you're working with a terabyte of data on one day, you can go up to a petabyte the next day. There's no need to worry about scalability in terms of performance.

Azure support is excellent.

Installation is simple. I handled the installation alone, and we performed the entire deployment in DevOps. You need at least a five-person team to manage and maintain the solution 

There's no consultant involved in this as far as the platform architecture is concerned because I own that architecture end to end.

Our license is about $5,000 per month, but it's $5,000 to $10,000 per month when you factor in services and everything else. 

I rate Azure Synapse Analytics eight out of 10. No competitors provide the entire solution to one place like Synapse. For example, a database just focuses moving and manipulating data, etc. But Synapse is like an all-inclusive workspace. 

I advise other people to go with Databricks Notebook if you need a computation engine. It has a solid SQL storage procedure. 

Suppose you are dealing with complex transformation logic and manipulation of run-time data flows. In that case, it's better to use Databricks than any Microsoft ADF. DataBricks looks more promising in terms of computing in memory, so we integrated Databricks in Synapse.

I use the solution in my company for graphs. We need graphs for some resources on Office 365. We also do a lot of stuff with other applications, specifically third-party applications. In Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, we use pipelines to manage the data from third-party applications.

I love the way Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics works, and I can also manage Microsoft Fabric. I can gather all the information using Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics on Microsoft Fabric, including areas revolving around reporting using Microsoft Power BI. I love the way all the application resources from Microsoft can synchronize, help me with a lot of stuff, and reduce the time or hour of having maybe a resource for an hour a day while also being able to use artificial intelligence.

In our company, we always want to improve our data management, including how to manage structured and unstructured data. Every day, we need to do a lot of stuff because we are a bank. We have reports from user accounts and client accounts. Eventually, I want to use machine learning bots, maybe since they can help our company.

I have experience with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics.

I am good with the tool's stability part. For stability, I would prefer Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics over other tools. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven to eight out of ten.

I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

To be able to manage the product's initial setup phase, I believe that you have to know a little bit of networking. On a scale of one to ten, if ten is the easiest, I rate the setup phase as a five or six.

Three people can deploy the solution. A developer, an administrator, and I, the vice president of technology, can deploy the tool.

The tool's on-demand query capabilities help enhance our analytical tasks. I like the way the tool works, as I have people doing queries and an analyst doing a lot of stuff in the product. I love the way that we can manage Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics.

One person can maintain the tool.

I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Our company uses the solution to mine generous amounts of data for customers. We are partners with Microsoft and are totally dependent on the solution. 

Synapses are very good and can deal with petabytes of data. 

The solution has far better synapse analytics than Redshift. 

The solution handles single or complex items within a second. 

Power BI is a great management tool that has email in the synapse itself so you can move regulations. 

The solution does not support oriented scaling in the synapse. 

I have been using the solution for seven months. 

The solution is stable and properly distributes all kinds of data including symmetric multiprocessing. 

The solution is scalable.

I have not needed technical support. If I have an issue, there is always another staff member who can assist. The staff can solve complexities within seconds. 

The setup is quite easy and similar to Jira. 

We implement the solution for customers. 

Deployment can take some time because you first have to collect and develop the data through client relations. This can cause lags. 

The computer and storage costs are totally separate which allows you to work independently or manage costs. 

In contrast, Redshift combines both costs. 

The solution is far better than Redshift in terms of secondary indexing and the level of international support.

It is easy to migrate data to the solution from other clouds, even for big organizations. A complete migration can be done in less than ten hours.  

The solution is better than other cloud platforms so I recommend it. 

I rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

The good thing about Synapse is the scale factor. It can handle a lot more volume of data compared to Azure SQL. There is Azure SQL, and there is a SQL Data Warehouse, which is now called Synapse. SQL is for smaller databases, and SQL Data Warehouse (Synapse) is for larger databases. Performance-wise, if you process a huge amount of data, SQL Data Warehouse is good due to its parallel processing capability. It's scalable. 

The setup is pretty simple. 

It's stable. 

In Azure, when you do the scaling up, it is not totally simple. It takes time to scale up. It actually kind of rebuilds the database behind this when you scale. If I am utilizing 1,000 of what they call the Data Warehouse and you need 1,200, there is downtime required.

There is a limit on the number of concurrent queries to around 125 for Azure Synapse.

I've been using the solution for a while at this point. 

The solution is pretty stable. The dedicated pool is pretty stable. It can handle quite a heavy workload.

The product can scale. 

For one of my clients, it was used as an Enterprise Data Warehouse, so it has got all kinds of insurance functions, and users. It has got an underwriting team, it has got the actual team, it has got a claims operations team, et cetera. All the enterprise Data Warehouse users start consuming data while using the visualization tools like Boll-BI, and then MicroStrategy, et cetera.

The initial setup is not complex. It's pretty simple and straightforward. 

There was a pool of DBAs that maintain all the Data Warehouse on-premise and cloud. There were hundreds of databases, and this is just one of the databases added to that list. The DBA team is comprised of five to six DBA team members.

I'm not sure of the exact cost, however, it is around $100,000 a year. 

We are Microsoft partners. 

Potential customers should check out the ease of management. This solution is easier to maintain compared toother options. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. There are some challenges related to this replication and then there is quite a lot of design thinking to be done.

What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is that it's native only for Azure, so you get better performance and there's no issue. To explain further, many different types of data come, in particular, structured and unstructured data. For audit purposes, there's also unstructured data, so the most important aspect is that with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, you have the capability of using both technologies, meaning that you can use or mix structured and unstructured data which is important. This can also be done in Hadoop, and on other platforms, so you have everything in one place. You don't have to worry about how to manage both structured and unstructured data and where to store information. With Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, you can take care of everything, particularly in Azure.

The solution also provides you with many features apart from analytics, for example, storage which makes it better.

An area for improvement in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is its user interface. You can use it for analytical purposes, but its platform should be a little bit more user-friendly.

Another small point for improvement in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is its stability. It's good currently, but it could still be improved.

Microsoft is combining different tools and technologies into one solution, so in the future, I'm expecting to see even more improvement in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics.

An additional feature I'd like to see in the next version of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is the drag-and-drop feature. If you're doing some integrations where you can write Scala or you have SPARK programming or SQL, or you're combining different programming, the process should be seamless, and you should be able to drag and drop in Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. When doing reporting in the solution, you should also be able to drag and drop. There should be connectors available and a drag-and-drop feature available in the user interface of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, so you won't have to worry about how all processes would work together. You need to be able to drag and drop even from the backend, and having this feature will make the solution more user-friendly.

I've been using Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics for three years.

In my opinion, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is stable. I would rate its stability seven out of ten.

As Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is on the cloud, it's scalable, and you won't have that many issues with scalability. If a solution is cloud-based, you won't have to worry about whether it's scalable or whether it supports other features, because you'd have all features in the cloud itself. You can scale up or scale down Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics based on your requirement, so it all depends on what exactly you want. In the cloud, you won't have to schedule, wait, think, or plan. You can scale up or scale down automatically anytime.

I'm working on behalf of a vendor for the client, so my team is supporting not just users of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics within my company, but several other companies as well. Apart from supporting the infrastructure, data-related services, and other services, my team provides a combined type of effort for clients. My team is a big team with people working together from three different companies providing support for Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. My team provides technical support for the solution.

The initial setup for Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is straightforward because Azure makes it very easy. Any Azure solution is very user-friendly, but you just have to know how to use the solution, and that's it. Setting up Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is not that complex if you're knowledgeable.

I evaluated AWS, and if you compare Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics with AWS, Azure excels more than AWS.

Amazon or AWS is established, and there's no doubt about it. It's also less costly in comparison with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, but since I worked on both platforms, if you want everything where you have to pay a little bit, and you don't want to pay or invest in some other development areas, and you want certain features to be automatically available for you, apart from a lot of features to be available on any platform you use, then your choice should be Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. Amazon is a cloud provider only and relies mostly on open-source, but Azure has support from Microsoft which is an innovative company. Whatever product is offered by Azure, Microsoft support is there, and as a company, Microsoft is always very innovative, so a product such as Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is very useful and very user-friendly, which you won't get that much, at least for now, from Amazon. If Amazon wants to be comparable to Azure and have the same capabilities, then it will need to depend on some other companies. Whereas for Microsoft products, for example, GEO, it's native to the Microsoft platform, so it's comfortable to use, even though it's open-source and you're never sure of what type of problems could arise. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, because it's an Azure or Microsoft solution, is more advantageous than AWS.

I'm an architect and I'm using Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, and apart from that solution, I'm also using other types such as Big Data, AIML, SPARK, and Scala. I'm also into other languages and reporting services.

I'm using the solution for my clients. Currently, I'm using it for clients, particularly Netherland-based banking institutions that have a cloud setup on Azure, but the deployment is now hybrid because of an ongoing migration. It's not completely migrated yet, so there's still something left in the data center. The clients have an ongoing migration from Hadoop and SD inSITE as well, which would be moved completely to Azure Cloud, so as of now, the deployment of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is still hybrid.

My rating for Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is seven out of ten as it combines many different features that you can use, so it's a good solution, and in the future, I'm expecting it to be better and better.

Several teams use Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, but then in my team, around twenty-five people use it, but that's not the complete number of users. Many people use the solution, with different features being used.

I don't see a product comparable to Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics that's available on the cloud. Currently, there's no comparison, so you can't say whether it's good or bad, though room for improvement in any product will always be there. Based on all the features of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, my rating for it is seven out of ten, at the moment, there's no competition for the solution because I've not come across any other tool that's comparable to Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics.

Dealing with big data is the primary use case.

Its scalability and ease of use are valuable. It is fairly simple for a tool that's that powerful. If you have a background in Microsoft SQL Server, it is a very easy-to-transition path.

They should automate some of the features. There are some things, such as the creation of external tables, that you have to do manually. They should be automated.

In terms of additional features, they're adding new features all the time. They have new features faster than I can figure out what to do with them.

I have been using this solution for five years.

So far, it has been pretty good. In five years, it has had two failures, which is pretty acceptable from my standpoint. Those were more environmental failures.

It is pretty much infinitely scalable if you got the money to pay for it.

Currently, we probably have 600 or 700 users in the county. They are mostly data analysts and data scientists. As far as developers go, we probably have 15 developers working with it right now.

It is fairly simple. It is a fairly simple tool to set up. It is all just clicking buttons. There is nothing overly complex to the initial setup process.

In terms of maintenance, it is a cloud product. So, the updates happen behind the scenes.

It just depends on how big your instance is. It could be anywhere from 1,000 to 50,000 per year depending on how big your instance is. You pay based on how big you make your database. Essentially, they charge you per hour of usage.

I am generally very satisfied with it. So, I would definitely recommend it.

I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for Azure Synapse is as a data warehouse, for creation of data pipelines. It allows login into to one central workspace, manage our databases, and the entire warehouse. We can embed business intelligence (BI), using Power BI. This allows us to show visualizations all in one central place.

I think potential areas to improve on could be performance and if they offered a decoupled compute from storage kind of service that would be nice. But I don't think that is possible as it's a fundamental change in the underlying architecture and Microsoft won't make that decision easily. 

We have been using Microsoft Azure technology for the last 4-5 years, including Synapse.

As Synapse is hosted on the Azure cloud, it's very stable. 

The Azure Synapse service is highly scalable. 

The initial setup is very straight forward. Azure Synapse offers you one workspace where you can do everything, creation of your data warehouse, ETL pipelines using Azure Data Factory, Create storage and data marts. Also use Power BI for visualization. 

Before Synapse was available, all of these was offered as separate services and this is how a data warehouse was constructed. Synapse is one layer on top of this where we make use of one single workspace to initiate and manage the entire set of services that you need for creating and managing your data platform - Data Warehouses and marts using SQL Warehouse, ETL pipelines using Azure Data Factory, Data Lake using Azure Blob Storage, and it offers server-less SQL - meaning you can run queries without having to initiate an SQL database or SQL data warehouse instance. It also offers Spark compute to process non-structured data.

We are a Microsoft partner and have setup and built Azure Synapse based solutions for our manufacturing, energy and healthcare clients. We are very customer centric and build and manage solutions based on our clients needs. We recommend what the best technology stack is for them. 

If I hosted a Microsoft setup on premise, I would need to invest in licensing for different tools and services, SQL server, SSIS, SSRS, Power BI or SSAS. Compared to this if you use Azure Synapse, the return on investment is very high. You get rid of your hardware, licensing and you move to a subscription based pay as you use model. Your operational costs reduce and your optimization increases. Capital expenditure absolutely diminishes and you move to an OpEx model. 

Finally, the overall management of it is simplified as compared to on premise. This of course leads to high RoI. 

Azure Synapse is best for people who are already invested in Microsoft technologies, in particular those who already use Microsoft data warehousing services, including MS SQL-Server based data warehouse technology. For them, migrating to Azure is very straight forward and Synapse adoption stays easy. 

With Azure Synapse, there is no database installation, no licensing cost, no hardware setup, everything is available as a cloud service, you then pay for the service, pay only for what you use. 

With regards to pricing, as I said you pay for what you use. The amount of data you store and compute power contributes to your pricing. If I use Azure's blob storage, the pricing depends on how much I use. If I utilize Azure Data Factory, pricing depends on how much data I process through the ETL pipelines and so on.

For some customers we recommend Snowflake, for others Azure Synapse or Google BigQuery. In one of our cases we are building a solution with both Azure Synapse and Snowflake. 

We have approximately 20-25 team members with knowledge of Azure Synapse service capabilities. 

With regards to deployment and maintenance, an Azure Synapse based solution may need anywhere between 3-15 people. This depends on what type of warehouse and analytics you want to create, the number of reports and visualization. Typically a small team size would be of 3-4 people and a large team size would be of around 12-14 members.