Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Reviews

We have servers in Azure, and we use it to connect the on-premises users to the cloud servers.

It is a site-to-site VPN deployed on our premise.

I'm using the high availability of the VPN. We are using the VPN Gateway with two different internet service providers on-premises. We are using high availability so that in case one of the internet services fails, we can get Azure to assist using the other service.

It works perfectly for me. It is very user-friendly in terms of the configuration and the setup process.

Their technical support could be better. If you don't have a support contract, it takes longer.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is very stable.

It is easy to scale. We started with a basic plan, and we can move to another plan that has more bandwidth and more features. It is possible to do that.

It depends. If you have a technical support contract with Microsoft, it is very easy. If you don't have it, it takes longer.

It is easy to set up. The deployment process is very quick. It takes 20 to 30 minutes to set up a site-to-site VPN.

I would definitely recommend this solution because it is very easy to deploy and very stable. It is very simple. It is only a VPN connection. It works for what it is made.

I would rate Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway a 10 out of 10.

I use the solution in my company to build IPsec tunnels on on-prem sites with Microsoft Azure's cloud services.

The feature that can improve our company's network connectivity revolves around the tool's IPSec functionality. I like the stability, HA, and performance of the product.

The product's deployment phase is not simple, making it an area where improvements are required.

I have two years of experience with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution.

Around 100 people use the tool in my company.

The solution can be deployed by myself.

The product's deployment phase is not straightforward.

The solution can be deployed by following the step-by-step instructions in Microsoft's guide.

The solution can be deployed in an hour.

The solution can be deployed by myself.

The measurable benefits that I have observed from the use of the product revolve around the scalability part.

I pay the licensing charges associated with the tool on an hourly basis. The tool is affordable.

Microsoft products have better scalability. The tool integrates well with other Microsoft products.

I recommend the product to others who plan to use it.

The tool is stable and cheap if used at a lower speed and with lower connections for users.

I don't use AI tools. I only work with networking solutions.

Considering the popularity of the vendor, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

I use the solution to connect on-premises networks to remote servers. With its help, I can access CRM and ERP databases.

The solution's most valuable feature is troubleshooting. It is easy to use and implement as well.

They should release a less expensive version of the solution.

I have been using the solution for one year.

The solution has good stability.

We have 2,000 solution users in our enterprise company.

I refer to online technical support communities in case of any issues.

The solution's price is reasonable for a new technology.

The solution is ten as it is easy to configure. We can view a five-minute demonstration on a YouTube video and configure VPN. 

I advise others to use FortiGate and Cisco as well. They offer a lot of capabilities.

The solution is cloud-based on Azure and primarily used for VPN side-to-side connection. We don't care about the point set solution because we use another solution for that.

The side-to-side connections are valuable.

The solution can be improved by including a config map to separate some traffic from different bases on similar on-premise equipment that can offer this functionality.

We have been using the solution for approximately six years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable, and approximately 500 users are currently utilizing the solution.

I rate my experience with customer service and support a seven out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup and the documentation part are simple to use. But if we try to have a design for redundancy, it's a bit complicated to set up because we have some dependencies if we use on-premises to cloud interconnection. Deployment took approximately forty-five minutes.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. The solution is good, but documentation and configuration settings can be improved. Nevertheless, I recommend the solution to users considering it.

The best feature is the ability to connect from anywhere.

The cost could be lower. In the next release, Microsoft should add an option to schedule upgrades.

I've been working with this solution for nearly six years.

Azure VPN Gateway is stable.

Azure VPN Gateway is a simple VPN, and it works. I would rate it as eight out of ten.

The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is its performance. It is very fast.

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway could improve by providing IPS zero-day threat protection. For example, the IPS zero-day threat protection can monitor the user behavior to protect the infrastructure. The solution can only be used as a VPN, it is lacking features. 

I have been using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway for approximately three years.

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway has good support.

I have used ExpressRoute previously.

The initial setup of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is straightforward. It only involves a few mouse clicks to complete. I only need to subscript and I can terminate it whenever I want.

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is the cheapest way for us to connect to our cloud infrastructure. Other solutions, such as ExpressRoute are very expensive.

When we want to build a traditional firewall on the Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, we have costs on the firewall license and the infrastructure machine costs on the Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway.

I rate Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway a six out of ten.

I am using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway to connect to my client. We use it to securely connect to other systems.

I have been using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway for more than three years.

All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable.

We have a Microsoft partner that gives us support for the solution.

I did not use other solutions previously.

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is already configured on my laptop, I only need to double click a button, enter my login information, and it connects.

There is a monthly license and the price depends on how many users are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The price could be less expensive.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway a nine out of ten.

The most valuable feature is the networking. I didn't have a good experience with the networking that Sophos has.

I would like for them to improve the troubleshooting features. We have some problems with traffic and I can't identify where the problem is coming from. I have to open a ticket with support until it gets resolved. Microsoft doesn't offer enough tools to resolve the issue. 

I have been using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway for three to four years. 

Stability depends. Sometimes I need to change the VPN Gateway for another tool like Palo Alto or Checkpoint because Microsoft isn't always so consistent. 

It is scalable. 

I don't have any problems with technical support. They're very good. The problem is the platform doesn't have enough tools to resolve problems but if you contact support, they have the ability to resolve anything. 

On-premise, I worked with other tools but my principal work is with Azure. I worked with Cisco ASA and Fortinet. I studied Cisco but I didn't work with it in an actual environment.

The initial setup is very easy. It's not difficult. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

It's simple to deploy, it's faster than other platforms, and it's scalable which is an important advantage. 

In the next release, I would like to see more troubleshooting tools. I would also like to see the connection to remain consistent.