Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Reviews

We have servers in Azure, and we use it to connect the on-premises users to the cloud servers.

It is a site-to-site VPN deployed on our premise.

I'm using the high availability of the VPN. We are using the VPN Gateway with two different internet service providers on-premises. We are using high availability so that in case one of the internet services fails, we can get Azure to assist using the other service.

It works perfectly for me. It is very user-friendly in terms of the configuration and the setup process.

Their technical support could be better. If you don't have a support contract, it takes longer.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is very stable.

It is easy to scale. We started with a basic plan, and we can move to another plan that has more bandwidth and more features. It is possible to do that.

It depends. If you have a technical support contract with Microsoft, it is very easy. If you don't have it, it takes longer.

It is easy to set up. The deployment process is very quick. It takes 20 to 30 minutes to set up a site-to-site VPN.

I would definitely recommend this solution because it is very easy to deploy and very stable. It is very simple. It is only a VPN connection. It works for what it is made.

I would rate Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway a 10 out of 10.

The most valuable feature is the networking. I didn't have a good experience with the networking that Sophos has.

I would like for them to improve the troubleshooting features. We have some problems with traffic and I can't identify where the problem is coming from. I have to open a ticket with support until it gets resolved. Microsoft doesn't offer enough tools to resolve the issue. 

I have been using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway for three to four years. 

Stability depends. Sometimes I need to change the VPN Gateway for another tool like Palo Alto or Checkpoint because Microsoft isn't always so consistent. 

It is scalable. 

I don't have any problems with technical support. They're very good. The problem is the platform doesn't have enough tools to resolve problems but if you contact support, they have the ability to resolve anything. 

On-premise, I worked with other tools but my principal work is with Azure. I worked with Cisco ASA and Fortinet. I studied Cisco but I didn't work with it in an actual environment.

The initial setup is very easy. It's not difficult. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

It's simple to deploy, it's faster than other platforms, and it's scalable which is an important advantage. 

In the next release, I would like to see more troubleshooting tools. I would also like to see the connection to remain consistent. 

The solution provides access to multiple applications and data. I use it for management, mainly to access platforms or as a bastion or management server. We are integrating the MFA into the VPN through Defender.

The solution is very quick to connect.

Microsoft could work on having micro VPNs to integrate with mobile devices.

I've used the solution for four or five years now and use the latest version.

The solution is very stable, and the performance is great. I've never had to complain about it. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is very scalable. Hundreds of users in my organization use the solution.

The initial setup is very straightforward. We don't need a lot of technical staff to deploy the solution.

We implemented the solution in-house.

The solution is subscription-based and very cheap.

I rate Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway a ten out of ten. Users should only use the solution for its main use case and other solutions for user access.