Microsoft Intune Reviews

We use this for management of all mobile devices.

We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks.

I have been using this solution for about three years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. We currently have tens of thousands of users within our organization using the solution.

I think customer support is quite good, we have enterprise support and premier support agreements.

Initial setup was straightforward.

Potential users should run a proof of concept. This can be done easily because Microsoft is offering a free trial period of one month.

I would rate this an eight out of ten.

The primary use of Microsoft Intune is for device management.

The solution is easy to use and it has good performance.

We can manage all our devices with the policies we want and it is secure. We can apply any policies we want, which gives us more flexibility.

There can be some added features, such as an improved dashboard. Any new feature that could be a benefit to our customers would be good.

I rate Microsoft Intune for approximately two years.

The solution is stable.

Microsoft Intune is scalable, we use it across many groups.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution in my organization.

I have not used the technical support.

We previously used AirWatch.

The installation is simple and it can be done quickly, within minutes.

We have a team that does the implementation of the solution.

There are licenses required for this solution. We enable licenses on the devices we need to manage.

We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft. It is part of our E3 and E5 of our bundle company package. We are happy with the solution.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

The solution is primarily used for people who want to manage their mobile devices.

It's difficult to describe how we've been able to improve our organization specifically with this solution.

The most valuable aspect of the product is that we are able to send application deployments and certifications for conditional access.

The solution is very easy to install.

The stability is good.

You can scale the solution if you need to.

Technical support is helpful. 

The MacBook management could be better. 

They should have better integration with, for example, Apple.

The synchronization could be improved.

They need to work on providing better troubleshooting techniques. 

I've been using the solution for two years. 

It's a very stable solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We have found the solution to be scalable. 

We have about 20 clients using the product. Typically, the users would be managers or assistant administrators. 

We've used technical support in the past. They are very fast and they know what they are talking about. We're happy with the level of support we get.

The implementation process is simple. It's very straightforward. 

I'd rate the overall initial setup process at a four out of five. 

Deployment times vary. It depends on the product. Our clients, for example, we're deploying it to all of their mobile devices. We use architects and engineers for the deployment process. How many we need depends on the project. We typically need, let's say, one architect and then, depending on the size of the project, one or more engineers.

We can integrate the product for our clients if they need us to.

I can't speak to seeing any specific ROI.

Customers do have to pay a licensing fee. Our clients pay a monthly subscription cost.

I cannot speak to the exact price as the licensing is complex. 

It's decent, however. I would rate it at a four out of five.

We did look at other solutions. The one we did look at closely was more for larger organizations in the manufacturing industry, which wouldn't have fit with our needs. 

We are Microsoft partners.

We are integrating the solution for our clients. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. With Intune, many companies may already have the product if they are also already using Microsoft.

I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

We use Microsoft Intune to secure our mobile access when you're assessing your data from your mobile. Additionally, we use the solution to limit people from transferring files to people that are not part of our domain, and secure company data from exposure.

The one feature we find most useful is the Mobile Application Manager. There are two types, we have the complete MDM and the Mobile Application Manager(MAM). We don't give our users phones, it is their own personal phone, and we need to allow them to have access to the company detail on their phone. We need to create a balance between their own personal data and the company data. We deploy the  Mobile Application Manager for them so that we won't be able to interfere with their own personal data.

We are always working with Microsoft on improvements. Improvement is not something that is static, we are always looking for a dynamic way of working with Microsoft. We have a support and enterprise agreement with Microsoft. Every quarter, we review the performance of all our solutions and then we ask for further improvement.

In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for approximately four years.

I have found Microsoft Intune to be stable.

Microsoft Intune is scalable.

The installation is not complex.

I would advise others to ensure that the technical people are well versatile and trained, especially the technical people that will implement Microsoft Intune.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

Being able to use it to control phones is the most valuable feature. 

It's a developing product, so there's lots of room for improvement. There's a lot of stuff we couldn't do because Google and Apple prevent you from doing a lot of the stuff you'd like to do. 

Microsoft documentation is a bit hard to get around, so having more control over devices would be good.

I've been using Intune for about a year or so.

We had no problems with stability.

It's hard to find the information to work out what you need to configure, but it's easy once you get to know how to work it.

The pricing is pretty good.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Endpoint Manager for patch management and software and application deployment. We also use it to engage with the user to be flexible and encourage them to use our organizational tool in their home or country, along with Microsoft 365 features and VDI.

Microsoft Endpoint Manager's patch management has been the most helpful to us. However, Microsoft Endpoint Manager has a lot of features. We could use it for cost management, inventory, and security purposes. But, bottomline, its best feature is patch management.

No tool is 100% perfect. An issue we have run into with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is that we cannot patch third-party products like Adobe and Chrome with it.

I have more than 10 years of experience with Microsoft Endpoint Manager. 

Microsoft Endpoint Manager is scalable. We have not run into any issues. 

The initial setup was not easy for me.

The pricing is reasonable. Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments. But for enterprises with more than 6,000 or 7,000 users, it can start to get a little expensive.

I'm a solution architect. When I put up a new solution for managing devices, I prefer to put it on Microsoft Intune.

At the moment, Autopilot is the most valuable feature.

The main disadvantage seen today is regarding Linux clients. We have a lot of development resources that have Linux on their clients, and we can't manage them on the same platform, as we do with other clients such as macOS and Windows. So, it should have support for Linux clients. It should also have better support for macOS.

I have been familiar with it since it was released. 

It is very stable.

It is scalable.

It depends on the technology for which you ask them for support.

We are also working with VMware Workspace ONE. When comparing these two products, I prefer Intune.

It is simple. It is easier than easy.

It is reasonable. When you have Microsoft 365 E3 or E5 license, it is already licensed in that license. So, you could say it is free.

It is quite easy to get people who understand the technology. For other platforms, at least in Sweden, there are not so many technicians who understand the technology.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

We use the policies and the features to quickly access devices and make policies for users working in another country, but their device is from Brazil.

The most valuable features are that users can make screenshots, and devices only need the minimal version of iOS.

The major problem with this product is that there can be delays in the deployment of new policies.

I have been working with Microsoft Intune for almost two years.

I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.