Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Purview Audit Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Microsoft Purview Audit Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Purview Audit based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Dynatrace, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Purview Audit surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive data tracking, real-time access monitoring, and advanced analytics, ensuring robust security and compliance for enterprises seeking to manage their information with unparalleled depth and precision.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog provides comprehensive monitoring with real-time performance metrics and seamless integration for dynamic infrastructure. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit focuses on compliance and data governance with features like detailed audit logs, appealing to enterprises with strong regulatory needs.
Download Datadog vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with competitive pricing, whereas Microsoft Purview Audit involves potentially higher initial setup costs. Key differences lie in budget considerations and setup complexity, making them suited to different operational demands.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with competitive pricing, whereas Microsoft Purview Audit involves potentially higher initial setup costs. Key differences lie in budget considerations and setup complexity, making them suited to different operational demands.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers real-time application monitoring with automated issue resolution, ideal for performance-focused organizations. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit is preferred for its robust data audit and compliance features, appealing to businesses that prioritize governance and data protection within Microsoft's ecosystem.
Download Dynatrace vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
Dynatrace setup costs are often perceived as significant, while Microsoft Purview Audit generally boasts a more straightforward and lower-cost setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace setup costs are often perceived as significant, while Microsoft Purview Audit generally boasts a more straightforward and lower-cost setup process.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers extensive security features and flexibility, ideal for comprehensive threat management. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit excels in compliance and data governance, providing seamless integration for Microsoft users. Tech buyers choose Splunk for versatility, Microsoft for integration ease.
Download Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security suggests a higher initial setup cost compared to the relatively lower setup cost of Microsoft Purview Audit.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security suggests a higher initial setup cost compared to the relatively lower setup cost of Microsoft Purview Audit.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar is valued for its detailed security analytics, providing robust threat management. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit offers seamless Microsoft integration with advanced audit capabilities, appealing to environments prioritizing streamlined deployment. QRadar attracts those seeking comprehensive security, while Purview Audit draws integration-focused buyers.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
IBM Security QRadar is known for its high setup cost, whereas Microsoft Purview Audit offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar is known for its high setup cost, whereas Microsoft Purview Audit offers a more affordable initial setup.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's ecosystem for efficient audit log management. In comparison, Grafana Loki offers flexibility in log aggregation across various sources, appealing to those seeking open-source solutions with high customization and extensive community support.
Download Grafana Loki vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
Microsoft Purview Audit has a higher setup cost compared to Grafana Loki, highlighting cost efficiency differences.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Purview Audit has a higher setup cost compared to Grafana Loki, highlighting cost efficiency differences.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit excels with seamless integration within Microsoft ecosystems, appealing to enterprises deeply embedded in that infrastructure. In comparison, Security Onion provides a comprehensive open-source suite for detailed threat detection, appealing to organizations seeking a customizable and community-supported cybersecurity solution.
Download Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Security Onion Report
Microsoft Purview Audit requires a higher setup cost, while Security Onion offers a more budget-friendly setup. The notable cost difference highlights varying implementation expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Purview Audit requires a higher setup cost, while Security Onion offers a more budget-friendly setup. The notable cost difference highlights varying implementation expenses between the two solutions.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Graylog Enterprise offers customizable log management with powerful search and dashboard options. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit emphasizes compliance auditing with strong Azure integration, appealing to businesses embedded in Microsoft's ecosystem for streamlined deployment and enhanced long-term ROI through centralized support.
Download Graylog Enterprise vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
Graylog Enterprise offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Microsoft Purview Audit involves a more complex deployment with higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Graylog Enterprise offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Microsoft Purview Audit involves a more complex deployment with higher expenses.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.1 out of 5
LogRhythm SIEM is favored for its robust threat detection and advanced analytics, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit integrates seamlessly within Microsoft ecosystems, offering easier deployment and lower initial costs, appealing to those already using Microsoft products.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
LogRhythm SIEM incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Purview Audit, highlighting differences in initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
LogRhythm SIEM incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Purview Audit, highlighting differences in initial investment requirements.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit excels in security and seamless Microsoft integration, ideal for compliance-driven environments. In comparison, Elastic Stack offers open-source flexibility and robust search capabilities, appealing to tech buyers seeking customization and deeper analysis options. Both provide unique value based on organizational needs.
Download Elastic Stack vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
Microsoft Purview Audit shows a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Stack presents a more variable pricing model, emphasizing the differences in cost structure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Purview Audit shows a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Stack presents a more variable pricing model, emphasizing the differences in cost structure between the two solutions.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Amazon CloudWatch excels in monitoring and logging for AWS environments, focusing on real-time visibility and metric monitoring. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit offers comprehensive governance and compliance auditing, providing extensive data governance and seamless integration with Microsoft services for enhanced compliance management.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
Amazon CloudWatch has a more straightforward setup process, while Microsoft Purview Audit presents a more complex configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon CloudWatch has a more straightforward setup process, while Microsoft Purview Audit presents a more complex configuration.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer excels in security analytics and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those prioritizing efficient log management. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit offers robust integration and auditing features, attracting buyers interested in comprehensive data exploration and long-term value despite higher initial costs.
Download Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer setup costs are generally moderate and straightforward, while Microsoft Purview Audit often involves higher initial expenses due to its complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer setup costs are generally moderate and straightforward, while Microsoft Purview Audit often involves higher initial expenses due to its complexity.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.1 out of 5
Sumo Logic Security offers cost-effective real-time analytics and easy data visualization. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit provides comprehensive auditing and seamless integration with Microsoft systems, favoring advanced compliance. A tech buyer might choose Sumo Logic for budget considerations and Microsoft Purview for extensive capabilities.
Download Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Sumo Logic Security incurs a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Purview Audit offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sumo Logic Security incurs a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Purview Audit offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
4.0 out of 5
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server attracts tech buyers with its affordability and ease of deployment for businesses with simpler IT needs. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit is ideal for enterprises requiring advanced data analytics and robust compliance features in complex data environments.
Download Microsoft Purview Audit vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Report
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers a one-time setup fee, making it ideal for budget-constrained environments, while Microsoft Purview Audit involves subscription-based pricing, reflecting its cloud-based capabilities and continuous updates.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers a one-time setup fee, making it ideal for budget-constrained environments, while Microsoft Purview Audit involves subscription-based pricing, reflecting its cloud-based capabilities and continuous updates.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Stackify
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Stackify
3.9 out of 5
Stackify offers real-time insights for developers with strong application performance management. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Audit provides extensive auditing vital for compliance. Tech buyers may choose Stackify for development insights or Microsoft Purview Audit for comprehensive compliance and security monitoring.
Download Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Stackify Report
Stackify offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, whereas Microsoft Purview Audit involves a more complex setup process, which may require higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Stackify offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, whereas Microsoft Purview Audit involves a more complex setup process, which may require higher initial investment.
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
CrowdStrike Observability
4.1 out of 5

Unify security, log management, and observability with the new CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale module, the next evolution of Humio, including the all-new managed Falcon Complete LogScale service.

Download CrowdStrike Observability vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report
View comparison

Related categories

Log Management
Microsoft Security Suite
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability