MuleSoft API Manager Reviews

We primarily use the solution for integration purposes. 

The solution offers good policies. We have all the policies available via drag and drop. It made it very easy.

I don't have any notes for improvements. I'm happy with it. 

I'd like more monitoring and analyzing features included in the future. It would be helpful to have a dashboard with monitoring and health check visible to users. 

I've used the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable. I'd rate it ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

I'd rate the scalability ten out of ten. It is easy to extend. We have multiple users on the solution. We have around 100 users so far. 

I don't have any experience with technical support. I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

I've also used Apigee, IBM API Connect, and Kong Enterprise. They are pretty new for me. I've used Apigee and IBM for a couple of weeks. I did not use a different solution previously.

The solution is pretty easy to set up. I'd rate the ease of setup ten out of ten. That said, I was not involved in the initial deployment directly.

I'm not sure about the solution's pricing. 

Currently, I'm evaluating the difference between this solution and Apigee, IBM API Connect, and Kong Enterprise.

I'm a customer and end-user. 

This is a very useful product. However, it is involved, and you do have to learn a few things to use it effectively. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. 

Our primary use case for this solution is for infestation and backend services. It is also a gateway. We use it heavily because Azure offers better pricing than its competitors. 

In addition, we use MuleSoft to run APIs. 

I can explain how this solution helped our organization through an example. Let's say, I want to buy my home insurance. I'd go to the market for the digital product and get a quote. Upon accepting the offer, I'll go through payment and then a three-step process for binding. After that, documents will be released to me in a multi-step process. MuleSoft provides a lot of the visualization and you are able to do the mapping and confirmations. It powers some of the connectors out of the box and you're able to connect to the different endpoints. You do not need to write many core basis and this is a great advantage.

The most valuable features of this solution are the Acura Station and the API Gateway.

The cost model could be improved.

I have been using this solution for around two years now.

I would rate the stability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate the scalability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate the pricing model of this solution a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most expensive and 10 being the best pricing.

Overall, I would rate this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I use MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager to manage and work on APIs for my company.

MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is a great solution. I like it very much because of its speed of delivery and because it allows API-led integration.

I also find MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager beneficial because it gives me a lot of information about who's consuming my APIs. It also has an analytics feature.

As a solution, it's easy to use. I also like that you can manage APIs easily on it.

An area for improvement in MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is the process of applying policies because it's manual. It would be great if MuleSoft could make the process easier, particularly by automating it.

I also want to see more features added to MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. One example is deploying an API without manual intervention to make processes faster.

I've been working with MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager for five years.

I found the stability of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager good, so the solution is a ten out of ten in that area.

Scalability is a problem in MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager mainly because of the cost to scale it. Scaling the solution is very expensive, so it's a real problem because my company needs to create a lot of architecture to solve the scalability issue, mainly because it has many APIs, which means more interfaces and channels. After all, one API is bound to a channel point of entry, and you have to separate each application or two or three applications to improve scalability, which is very difficult for my company.

Scalability-wise, I rate MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager as five out of ten.

MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager provided excellent technical support, so it's a ten for me on a scale of one to ten.

Positive

We used a different solution before MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager but went with MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager for digital transformation.

The initial setup for MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager was easy.

I'm giving it a ten out of ten in terms of setup.

My company has a lot of APIs, so for thirty applications, the total time it took to deploy MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager was two hours.

Our in-house team deployed MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager for the company.

I want MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager to be cheaper because when you scale up, it becomes very costly. Price-wise, I'd give it a seven out of ten.

I work as a tech lead. My company is a MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager customer.

About ten people from different departments take care of the deployment and maintenance of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager.

I'd tell others planning to implement MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager that scaling the solution can be costly. Hence, it's essential to factor in the costs. I'd also tell others that MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is easy to use. Still, as a solution, it would benefit more from improved DevOps to make it even easier for users and result in more business for MuleSoft.

I'm rating the solution eight out of ten because it's easier to run and manage than others.

Our first primary use case for this solution are APIs based in MuleSoft. It's natural to use the MuleSoft API manager for MuleSoft APIs. We also use this solution's API manager to manage non-MuleSoft APIs in environments based on the MuleSoft platform. It functions as a kind of API gateway for us.

The feature I found most valuable is the ability to add a central place for managing your policies for APIs. This makes our life easier and enables central monitoring.

I would like to see MuleSoft expand the range of APIs you can manage with it beyond HTTP, GIPC, and others.

I have been using MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager for about six months.

I would rate the stability of this solution a 10, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the least stable, and 10 being the most stable.

My impression is that this product is quite scalable. I would rate its scalability an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I have not had any contact with their technical support team.

The initial setup was relatively easy. I would rate it a 10, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the hardest and 10 being the easiest. The deployment process was done with an in-house team of three people.

We have seen a return on investment but not from the product itself, but rather from the platform. If you adopt the whole platform, you can build composable applications. This will cut your time creating new applications and updating them – once you have everything running – by up to 50%.

I would rate the pricing of this solution a seven, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. My opinion is that it's a bit expensive but they do offer a lot.

The advice I would give to anybody looking to try this product is: if you have a lab, test out all the MuleSoft features to make sure that they will bring what you need into your environment. I would say that with any product. It's always good to have a list of requirements and make sure that the product does what you want.

We primarily use the solution for API management.

We can use both on-premises and cloud setups. 

The API policies are great.

We can use command line, and it also has a good UI.

We can select the required servers and deploy API. It's great for managing the API.

If we talk about the designing of our API site with RAML and putting it into the exchange and then looking at it as a library, it's pretty good. 

The initial setup can be pretty straightforward. 

It's stable. 

We can scale the product.

I'd like an option for having customized policies also. I'd suggest that the product provide some inbuilt customized policies alongside the ability to fully customize.

The solution is expensive. 

They're coming up with lots of new things right now. I'm looking for something like AI-based monitoring in the future.

I've been using the solution for almost three years. 

The solution looks to be stable. It is reliable so far. there are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

We've found it to be a scalable product in general. 

I'm not sure of the exact amount of users. 

We have technical support from MuleSoft, and they have a portal where we can log the ticket. We've had a couple of resolutions already.

Positive

So far, we've had pretty straightforward setups. That said, we are looking to build a more complex project right now, and that implementation may be more involved. 

We were able to do a couple of things by ourselves. We are also planning on building a complex integration with the system soon.

I'm not sure of the exact cost of the solution. 

While I haven't had detailed discussions, my understanding is that the solution is expensive. I found it pricey when I was doing some research.

I evaluated a couple of tools. We wanted to compare to see what might be better. We wanted to use one of MuleSoft's business units. MuleSoft stands out.

We're trying to build a partnership with MuleSoft right now. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

You can find SLA there. You can do the security level that you need. You can also do any authentication, authorization, implementation, etc.

You can create it yourself and publish it. While publishing, if there is a unique ID generated by that, it will be implemented there while creating the application. While deploying to the cloud, the Mule runtime is internally created and embedded in the API Manager.

All of these features are available in the cloud, and you can configure it. It is of great benefit to the customer.

MuleSoft has given the API solution a 3-tiered architecture. This means that there are multiple channels available in one application. The usability is very high.

MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower.

I've been working with this solution since 2017.

It is highly stable, and that's why MuleSoft is booming. Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager internally uses the AWS availability zone. When one availability zone is down, then it will automatically route to another availability zone. You will not find this kind of stability on-premises because you can have server issues. However, on the cloud it's very stable and very reliable.

MuleSoft has horizontal and vertical scaling capabilities.

The technical support is good, but it is a new solution, so it will take time to mature. I would give technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is easy. You may have some issues when you deploy it for the first time if the team is new, but once you do it, the next time it will not take much time.

You just need half a day or one day of training, and any team member can implement the solution.

Maintenance wise, it doesn't require a lot because it's on the cloud. You do have to monitor some things on your end, but other maintenance issues are taken care of by MuleSoft.

You will need to look at your requirements and choose the solution.

Message Broker, ACE only has ESB and does not have the gateway. You will have to buy additional software, but MuleSoft has embedded both API and ESB. This is called method-oriented architecture.

In terms of the speed and process, I prefer Message Broker, ACE technology IIB. In my current project, we are processing 25 MB to 50 MB files, and Message Broker is able to do it. However, with MuleSoft it would take more time. MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower.

I would rate Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager at ten on a scale from one to ten.

We primarily use the solution for API management.

Their gateway is great. They have a pay manager gateway which I find very interesting. 

We like their API manager.

Their RTF, runtime fabric, is very useful.

The stability overall has been pretty great.

We didn't have any issues with the initial setup.

Technical support has been very helpful.

Their ability to observe is good.

Some items are not ideal. For example, they should for sales management, they need better performance in the core processing.

The IO blocking isn't ideal.

We find that the enterprise level is lacking scalability.

We have some hundred Linux boxes and 400 or so APIs and for scaling, we are facing challenges. However, we haven't yet compared it to other ESBs, and therefore it's possible that all ESBs are limited in the same way.

They're in the process of evolving right now. There are many changes on the horizon that may prove to be interesting. For example, we've implemented CI/CD and now it's my understanding that the graph scale's also coming. 

I've been using the solution for four years.

The stability of the solution is pretty good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The scalability is lacking. We're not sure if it's just this solution or ESBs in general, however, we've had trouble scaling as we need to.

We have about 100 users on the solution currently. They are mostly tech leads, senior developers, and architects.

Technical support has been great. If you raise a ticket, then they respond on the basis of the severity of the issue, the criticality of the issue. They attend to the call really quickly. We've been happy with the level of support on offer.

The initial setup is very straightforward. We didn't have any issues at all. It's simple and easy to implement and not overly complex.

We have 30 to 50 people that comprise a support team that can help handle any maintenance issues. 

We did have assistance from MuleSoft support.

I don't have any visibility on the licensing and therefore cannot speak to the exact cost of the product.

We are working with a platinum tier and have an unlimited core. It's my understanding is that there are no additional costs beyond the licensing fee itself. 

We've gone live with MuleSoft and I have been comparing it with TIBCO or Dell and IBM products. If it's threat management that can be done concurrently across platforms, maybe it can be performed better. However, I've heard TIBCO is not evolving at this time.

I was exploring other options for my own knowledge and understanding as I am looking for a job change. People not only use Mulesoft, and companies want to have knowledge in two to three platforms. I'm just comparing Mulesoft with IBM ESB, Oracle, and a few other products. 

We're just a customer and an end-user.

Previously, a Mulesoft community edition was available. We started using Mulesoft's community version. We were exploring some ESB in our organization four years back. We started using MuleSoft as we've got Salesforce. At that time, Mulesoft was not yet acquired by Salesforce and that's why we went with the community edition. It was good. It was free. Then, slowly, we purchased some courses and Mulesoft was more connected to Salesforce. Now also Salesforce is there and AWS is there and it's more well-known and integrated. We thought it would help us due to its growth.

I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. It's a product that's still evolving. 

We're using MuleSoft API Manager to integrate with an endpoint in our backend system to import much information into Salesforce. Other tools didn't allow for as many API calls, so we used it to create a new endpoint.

The tool needs to improve customization and interface. 

I have been using the product for a year. 

I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten. 

The technical support has been very responsive. I've opened three cases, and the previous ones were solved quickly.

Positive

I'm currently deploying MuleSoft API Manager, but it's not fully deployed. There have been some challenges, mainly related to IP restrictions, which I believe are on our side. The testing phase took about two months due to people being on holiday. I'm hoping the actual deployment will go quickly, but I'm unsure how long it might take as technical issues could arise.

I can't say definitively about cost savings since we're still in the testing phase. MuleSoft uses separate testing and production environments, with more resources allocated to production. So far, in testing, it works fine and does everything it needs to, but I'm not sure how performance will compare in production.

We faced IP restriction challenges, which we resolved by changing the authentication method from an API key. This solved the issue for now, but we'll need to verify it again in production.

Based on my 2-3 years of experience with MuleSoft products, I'd rate MuleSoft API Manager eight out of ten.

We use the solution to integrate various applications and services, whether it's integrating Salesforce or other third-party systems.

The solution is crucial for businesses, especially those looking to streamline their operations through seamless integration. The platform offers features for API monitoring, security, and lifecycle management.

The MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager simplifies workflow documentation for Azure Logic Apps and Azure Functions. It's a valuable tool for managing APIs, whether you work directly with MuleSoft or within the Azure ecosystem. It simplifies workflow documentation for MuleSoft applications and APIs.

The platform offers seamless integration of code and visual components. Anypoint API Manager provides various advantages in the integration field, including support for Azure services and cloud integrations. It facilitates integration across multiple systems, including Salesforce and other CRM.

The solution’s scalability and integration could be enhanced. Also, it can offer workflows, orchestration, and webhooks.

I have been using MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager for two years.

The product is stable and has 15 nodes.

The solution is scalable. 20 people are using this solution.

Customer support is user-friendly.

The initial setup is easy. You deploy it or install it to the project. To set up your project in MuleSoft, you need API ops tools, and Anypoint is one option for this setup.

The product is cheap and similar to Apigee or Azure.

I recommend this solution since it is stable.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I am an enterprise architect.  I work with Anypoint API Manager and MQ as part of my role in MuleSoft projects.

Typically, the customers use it to capture events from Salesforce in the auto industry, sending these events to their backend systems. They mainly process events from Salesforce.

The ease of maintaining Anypoint MQ and applying policies on APIs is particularly valuable.

So, the ease of policy maintenance and API functionality are key features for me. They streamline business processes by allowing configurable control over policies, instead of writing codes and making maintenance more straightforward.

Overall, it's quite efficient. However, I'd suggest more control over MQ restarts and greater transparency in traffic management.

I have been using this solution for five years. I am working with the MuleSoft 4.0 stack.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It's mostly stable. However, sometimes, visibility is less in terms of monitoring messages. We lack the capability to restart queues on our own, which is why I rated it nine. Otherwise, it's reliable for regular use.

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It's scalable, so if we need more licenses or queues, we can easily get them.

I've worked on at least ten different projects using this. We have multiple customers using this solution. Our customers are small, medium, or enterprise businesses.

Customer service and support are always great. Whenever we face issues, especially with Anypoint MQ's lack of transparency, we reach out to them. They respond quickly, identifying the issue, and we can set up a call or troubleshoot over email if needed.

Positive

The initial setup is quite straightforward and user-friendly. It's mostly deployed on the cloud.

Deployment is quick since it's a SaaS model. We primarily focus on configuration.

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten. It's not very expensive, reasonably priced. There are no additional costs. 

I would definitely recommend it. It's a fantastic product. Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.