MuleSoft API Manager Reviews

The tool has a private area. It also has a cloud deployment option. 

The solution's price is high. 

I am using the tool for more than six years. 

The solution is very stable. I would rate its stability an eight out of ten. 

The tool is scalable. I would rate its scalability a nine-point five out of ten. 

The product's support is good. 

Positive

The tool's setup is easy and quick. 

I would rate the product's pricing a seven-point five out of ten. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. AWS is cheaper than MuleSoft. 

I have used this solution for an Europe based customer. They have ticketing tools like ServiceNow and other applications in their multiple locations including Asia, the Pacific and North America. The idea was to integrate data communication between those applications.

When using the Mulesoft Anypoint Platform, it has a wide range of connectors that are readily available to connect with the multiple applications. They have specifically categorized the API application into three parts; backend APIs, middle APIs (which handles a business process), and front end layer APIs. These distributed API applications make Mulesoft a well matured and organized platform. 

Migrating any existing middleware platform to Mulesoft is difficult because of the transformation, conversion and integration involved. Better tools are needed to achieve quicker time to market.

The security infrastructure for this solution could be improved. Other API tools have more security options available. API Connect, for example, has specifically designed policies where I can customize my security framework for internal and external users. That kind of infrastructure is not available with Mulesoft.

I have used Mulesoft API Management for one year. 

This is a stable solution if the hardware is set up properly. You need to monitor the load of the APIs and the bandwidth they use to achieve maximum throughput. 

This is a scalable solution. 

We have hardly needed assistance from a technical perspective because their infrastructure is powerful and after sale service is good. I would rate it a four out of five.

The initial setup is complex when it comes to establishing the connectivity between on-premise services and cloud services. Deployment took between six and eight months. We have two junior resources who are responsible for maintenance but the solution does not require much maintenance after being pushed to production. 

Mulesoft is great in terms of reusability. When I design APIs for backend application, they can be reused because they are independent of the business flow. It is a good overall solution compared to other API management technologies with a quick time to value. 

The pricing for this solution is cheaper than GCP and Bluemix.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

We utilized Mulesoft API Management for a learning management system and content management system for the education sector.

We used the latest version of this solution. It was deployed on a hybrid Azure cloud.

There are around 200 people using this solution.

The security features are good. It's easy to configure the end-to-end integration with existing applications.

There should be more pricing options or certain discounts for the education sector.

I used this solution for about six months. I work as a cloud solution architect for a few companies.

It's stable.

We didn't utilize the scalability features.

Technical support is good. I was already working in Mulesoft, so I didn't require any technical help.

I'm a technical guy, so it was pretty straightforward by reading the documents.

Deployment took five months.

I was working as an architect. After that, they got their own in-house development team, and I handed over the entire project to them to manage the deployment and further development.

There were two people on the development team, and I was working as a cloud solution architect, so the whole team was three people.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

I am offering consulting services to help clients build the API. I am not involved in the deployment or anything behind the API.

We are using the Anypoint component for the integration layer which is not specific to the API management.

Its best feature is that its plugins are somewhat unique in the market. We have budgets, prime membership, and pre-plugins available in the marketplace that we can use immediately.

I believe there is an issue with MuleSoft, specifically the studio, it is very slow.

The performance could be faster. Their studio performance is very slow, and it requires a lot of memory which should be improved. 

It is not as compatible as other options available.

You would like to improve studio performance in the next release.

I have been working with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for three years.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is very stable.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is a scalable product.

We have 300 users in our company, and we use approximately 10,000,000 hits per day.

We will definitely increase our usage. It should be standard as a requirement model. It's not specific. We have a capability team, and the capability team gives us access to that information. We have a plan, but we cannot provide specific data numbers because of time constraints.

The technical support is very good. One of the best things about MuleSoft is its community. They provide support if you raise an issue in the MuleSoft community they will respond. Anyone who is available will respond and resolve your query as soon as possible.

I was not involved in the installation.

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

Definitely, I will recommend Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager over IBM App Connect.

I would rate Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager a seven out of ten.

I use Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for application integration.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager's most valuable aspect is it has plenty of features.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager could improve the monitoring because it is very poor quality and not user-friendly. It is not as good as other solutions on the market.

I have been using Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for approximately two years.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager has been stable and my usage. However, there have been some issues with SMTP connectors.

The scalability of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is good.

We have approximately 80 people using the solution. They are architects and developers. We have plans to increase the usage of the solution if the depends require it.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager technical support is good, they are responsive.

I rate the support from Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager a five out of five.

I have previously used different API gateway solutions, such as Akana API Management and SOA Software.

The initial setup of the Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is simple. The whole process did not take a lot of time.

We did the implementation of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager in-house.

The price of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is very high.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is a very good solution.

I rate Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager a nine out of ten.

This solution was primarily used for data retrieval.

Anypoint API Manager's most valuable feature is its connectors.

In the next release, Mulesoft should make it easier for people who don't have the native connectors to build their own rather than using the APA from the power platform or outlet.

The stability is pretty good, I haven't seen any issues with it.

I didn't see any issues while using the APIs and connectors, which means it's scalable.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward because we purchased support from Mulesoft, so their engineers took care of it. However, using it within the user-integrated cloud was a bit tricky.

I would give Anypoint API Manager a rating of nine out of ten.

I mainly use Anypoint for data integration and flow, and securing, transferring, and monitoring data logs.

The most valuable feature is the API manager.

Anypoint could be improved by making it more open and configurable for small companies, who tend not to consider the solution as it's expensive and requires a lot of costs upfront.

I've been using this solution for more than two years.

Anypoint's reliability is very good, we've had no issues with it.

Anypoint is very capable in terms of scalability.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward and takes a couple of hours, but it depends very much on the licensing because not all licenses cover all the features MuleSoft has. Sometimes, especially on CloudHub, it can look like everything will be nice and easy, but if you're expecting to have some features and don't see them, you have to go back to MuleSoft and find out what's happening.

We used an in-house team to implement since we are experts on this solution.

Anypoint is the most expensive solution on the market, as far as I know, though it's also the most capable.

I would advise making sure your enterprise is following an API-led connectivity approach and is prepared for digital transformation. Also, make sure that there are no internal conflicts between the product and internal strategic goals and needs so that it will be relevant and synchronized. I would rate Anypoint as ten out of ten.

We use Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for different reasons, it depends from project to project. We mainly use Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager to orchestrate some internal system integration processes.

The most valuable features of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager are the API gateway, rate limiting, and orchestration.

The dashboards in Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager could improve.

I have been using Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for approximately one year.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is a scalable solution.

The support from Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager needs to improve.

The initial setup of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was complex. For those running Kubernetes it is an even higher difficulty level for the initial implementation.

We do the implementation of the solution. We have three people supporting our systems but they are not only dedicated to Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager.

The licensing model is based on how many cores are used. It is a very simple licensing scheme.

My advice to others is they will need strong technical support for this solution, however, they do not provide good support. If you are not experienced in this solution you may encounter some technical problems during the implementation and maintenance period. A strong architect is needed to help do the infrastructure and architecture of this solution.

I rate Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager a six out of ten.