Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) Logo

OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.2 out of 5

What is OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL)?

Featured OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) reviews

OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) in the Indexing and Search category stands at 6.1%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Indexing and Search Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL)6.1%
Elastic Search12.0%
Lucidworks6.3%
Other75.6%
Indexing and Search
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Transportation Company
18%
Government
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Wholesaler/Distributor
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Construction Company
3%
International Affairs Institute
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Media Company
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
University
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%

Compare OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL)

OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) customers

Related questions

 
OpenText Knowledge Discovery (IDOL) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Team Lead Solutions Architect at IMEXPERTS DO BRASIL4.0No summary available
Sr Technical Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I've used IDOL for five years, valuing its unstructured data processing. Setup was straightforward, and deployment issues were quickly resolved. Customer service is good, but technical support could improve. I'd like better native key view capabilities.
Senior Technical Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees4.5I value the connectors and CFS, noting speed improvements over older Fetch architecture. I'd appreciate best practices for optimizing Lua Scripting configuration to prevent CFS processing slowdowns.
IT Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I've seen a 30% improvement in search success and productivity using this solution for a year. Its extraction features are valuable, and it's stable. However, on-premise installation is complicated, and documentation could be better.
Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We quickly implemented this enterprise search solution, centralizing information despite initial SSO and complexity challenges. Early ROI shows over 50% improvement in satisfaction and content finding, though mobile-friendliness is a needed enhancement.