The performance of the solution is impeccable.
The simplicity and ease of use is fantastic. Compared to other databases, it's not a complex tool to manage.
The performance of the solution is impeccable.
The simplicity and ease of use is fantastic. Compared to other databases, it's not a complex tool to manage.
While working with 20-30 terabytes is okay using this solution, if you have Big Data, data that's much bigger than that, you will run into issues. It's a problem I have right now. They should support much more data.
Aside from that, the solution isn't lacking any features that I can think of. It's an almost perfect solution, aside from the data issues we face.
I've been using the solution for many years. It's been a long time.
The solution is extremely stable. There are no problems with it there. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or fail. It's completely reliable.
Scalability is a problem for us. We need something that can handle Big Data. By Big Data, I mean more than 30 terabytes of data. Anything under that, and the solution might scale okay, however, for us, scalability is a problem because of the vast amounts of data we need to work with.
Technical support is excellent. They're really great. I have no complaints in regards to the level of support they provide to us. We've been satisfied with their service.
I've looked at Axway Data, and it is a very good solution as well, however, it is a bit expensive and offers little support for very Big Data.
We work closely with many integrator companies, however, we don't have a business relationship with Oracle. I'm a technical architect, so I just make some recommendations, and that's all.
I'd recommend the solution, so long as you aren't working with very very Big Data like we are. I could also recommend Axway, which I believe is also good.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
The primary use case of this solution is in a financial institution to store our transactional data.
This product has a number of features. The feature that I worked with and that excited me the most is one that is not available in other databases, and it involves the use of Java Runtime.
There is also a feature that will trace the transaction and direct them to an FTP server. That was excellent. It is provisioned with very little additional cost.
The database has a lot and not everything is known to every user. The licensing is a bit complicated.
I am trying to configure the GoldenGate and I find that you have to connect to the classic one in big data, I should use only one instead of two to stream the data to streaming platforms.
The integration with other vendor solutions needs improvement. It is difficult to connect to other hardware.
I would like to see more focus on the features that are supporting the new technology, rather than just focus on the hardware.
I have been working with Oracle Database for approximately seven years.
This solution is stable and we have not had any issues.
It's a scalable solution.
We have subscribed to the site, where we can ticket the problem. There is a library of issues that have been recorded worldwide. You can search the library resources to find your problem and follow that research to resolve it.
The initial setup was straightforward. The challenge comes with performance tuning, where you need more experience.
I do more than 70% of work on an Oracle database, which is why I would recommend it to others.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for auditing purposes.
The best feature of the solution is the capability of running extreme processes for database processing requirements.
From a database product perspective, I would say, they're good in what they provide. There's not much concern.
For our organization, the price is the main factor that needs improvement. They charge you exorbitantly for a license, and, I would say, they are not doing justice to today's industry requirements when it comes to a pricing model. They talk about cloud hybrid on-prem solutions, and they tell you that you have a cloud solution that will benefit your company considerably, however, it's just a lot of cut-throat pricing that they offer.
From the perspective of using the database in a legacy product, some people are usually stuck with it, and they need to continue working on that. That's a new thing they have not been able to change. The licensing model works in a different way altogether. It's not really very friendly for management to take decisions when it comes to executing licensing right for a product like this.
If their database encryption features could come in bytes, that would be a major improvement. They should bring the encryption model to their standard databases as well.
We've been using the solution for about seven years now.
In terms of stability, it's got a little bit more stability than it used to be. It's good. It's been quite stable, however, I believe the stability is limited to a standard model of licensing that we are provided.
Technical support has been very good for us. We have no complaints. We're satisfied with the level of service we've been provided. They are very helpful.
The licensing costs are very high. We feel the solution is price gouging its customers.
The solution has a standard license, which is different from an enterprise license. If you need the encryption feature, you need to go up to enterprise licensing which has a whole lot of other features that you may not even be using. Encryption is a top requirement in the industry, however, you're forced to use the enterprise edition if you need to use anything like this. That said, it is always better to go to a standard edition, which has more limited capabilities but can still fit into your product perspective.
I'm not reselling this product. I'm using this for designing my own product, and I'm giving it as a solution to my customer. If I need to work out pricing for my customer, there may be my own raw materials that come into play.
The raw materials that come into play should be considered in order to make a better pricing model, which in turn can help me get a better solution for my clients. If the base product that you use is so expensive, like this is, it doesn't make sense. I would start looking at other products. That's what I'm doing. I need to better scale my capabilities.
I'd recommend Mongo Database over this product for that reason.
I'd rate the solution overall eight out of ten. It's very good. It's just a bit too expensive for my purposes.
We mainly use the solution for database purposes. We are maintaining the standard edition version and normally not on a very big scale.
We are only really utilizing the solution for database purposes and only taking the database for backup purposes, on a daily basis. The database and getting the required data on the database have been very helpful.
It's easy to use, it's robust, and it offers good security that we can count on.
Most importantly, our users are familiar with the interface and the operational capability of this product. That's why we chose to use Oracle.
While we don't interact too much with the database and interact more with our front-end application, we get good reports as it simply runs in the back end.
It's a very comprehensive database, although we are using only the standard version, not the enterprise version. Even the standard version is quite good. It's very reliable.
It all depends on the requirements we have. Right now, it's fulfilling our current ERP requirements.
We don't really find that any features are lacking.
We have been using it for the last 10 years.
The solution is very stable. I haven't experienced bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes. It's quite reliable. An organization shouldn't have to worry about it's stability at all.
It's scalable.
However, in terms of our usage, it's quite limited. We are using only three to four modules of this application. We're a very small scale operation. It's the reason why we are using the standard edition and not the enterprise one.
We only have about 10 to 15 users that are using these applications.
It's not used on a daily basis. It's just occasional use.
We find technical support to be very responsive. They briefly describe everything on phone and we handle the operations. I'd say we've been more than satisfied with their level of service. They're quite helpful and knowledgeable.
It's my understanding that we've always used Oracle. I can't recall if there was something before that was used.
The initial setup is very simple. It's not complex at all. To deploy it only took about one hour. It's quite quick and easy.
It's a very good application. Once we installed it and it started running, we haven't needed to perform regular maintenance on it and we haven't faced any issues. We installed it four or five years ago. It's been a long time and it's been in perfect working order since we launched it. The solution is seamless.
We're just a customer and we have the licensed product. We are continuously updating the license on an annual basis.
It's a standard license, with a worldwide standard licensing cost for Oracle that we are paying. The fees are at about 22%.
It's a very good product. I'd recommend it. It's very robust. It's scalable. On side of security, it's a very secure product. And support is available from Oracle via their local partners. We are already very satisfied with this product and I would recommend it to other users as well.
I'd rate it eight out of ten.
The solution is used mainly for the database.
The database is very good for holding our client's data.
Oracle has a very good RIC (Retail Integration Console). It gives good visibility.
Overall, from a technical perspective, the solution is very strong.
The licenses are quite expensive. They should work on making it more affordable for their customers and it needs to be simplified. The database environment needs to be cheaper. By making it less expensive, Oracle would be more competitive with other database vendors.
We don't use the solution ourselves. We're an Oracle partner. We deploy the solution for our customers.
The stability of the solution is okay. I don't recall experiencing bugs or glitches. The solution hasn't crashed on me before. It's quite reliable. Stability is never an issue.
We deployed the Oracle database on the HCI environment. We can expand and scale it easily. It just requires expanding the hardware itself.
Typically, if a customer has a problem with the solution, we will look into the issue. We are the ones that maintain the solution for our clients.
However, technical support is good.
The only downside is that occasionally when we do need to communicate with the technical support team, we need to do so via one of our engineers. There's a bit of a language barrier, so a little translation is often needed.
The initial setup isn't complex. It's quite straightforward. We do, however, have an expert in Oracle on staff, so that may make things easier for us.
Deployment took about one month from beginning to end.
Pricing on the solution is higher. There are less expensive database options on the market.
Our organization is partners with Oracle.
We mostly implement the solution on-premise because our customer is a governmental agency. The protocol is that they cannot store information on the cloud as it is far too sensitive.
I would advise other organizations to try it out. I'd recommend the solution.
I would rate the solution about eight out of ten. I would rate it higher if the licensing costs were not so high.
One of the best aspects of the solution is that it is very easy to use. In my opinion, for how I use it, I find it quite straightforward.
Occasionally I do have some technical issues. However, there are very good communities that can help solve problems, so It's not too bad.
It could be slightly more intuitive, but other than that, we really like it as a solution.
For our type of usage, we don't have any particular requirements or needs that the solution doesn't provide. I can't speak to any features that may be lacking in general. Right now, I don't find that it's lacking in any regard.
I've been using Oracle Database for about five years now.
I've never faced any stability issues with the product. I don't recall any bugs, glitches, or crashes. I'd say it's fairly stable and shouldn't cause anyone issues in that regard.
We are working with the software that moves the current update store. We don't have problems with any new features or applications or integration, so I believe it to be very scalable.
Currently, we have about 3 people using the database. There is only one developer and the rest are admins that are simply connected to the database.
We have never faced many issues in terms of having trouble with the solution. For that reason, we haven't really dealt with technical support, so I can't speak to how good or bad they are.
We did previously use a different solution, however it was associated with a company that gave us the software and when they switched to Oracle, we, by default, did as well.
At the beginning, I may have found it a bit tricky, and other new users might too. At this point, after a number of years, I don't think it's too difficult. However, it may be because I'm used to the system. Those coming at it completely new may find it a bit complex.
The initial setup is quite quick. For us, it didn't take more than an hour or so. It was probably less than that.
I don't deal with the accounting, so I can't speak to the pricing of the solution.
We're not an Oracle partner. We're just a customer.
We're quite comfortable with this solution at the moment. It provides us with everything we need.
I'd highly recommend Oracle Database to other companies and users. We haven't had any issues at all using it aside from a few small technical issues. It's good software. It's very stable and reliable.
Personally, I would rate the solution nine out of ten. It's almost perfect.
We use this RDBMS for OLTP, OLAP, and Data Warehousing.
This solution is easy to use, provides good tuning options, backup & recovery, and overall a professional network.
The most valuable features of this solution are the cost optimizer and partition exchanges.
The cost of this solution needs to be improved.
We have been using this solution for twenty years.
Our primary use case is Oracle EBS using Oracle Database 8.
Oracle Database is the base of all local solutions in the company. Oracle Database is fast and easy to use. I have been using geospatial solutions for a long time, too.
This is the last solution before cloud and cloud developers no longer have knowledge about the Oracle database.
The most valuable features are Velocity, security, and compatibility.
Solutions for cloud developers are in need of improvement.
Cheap and easy solutions for startups need to be made available.
We would like to see Oracle Apex as an independent and paid solution.
