Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
manager863820 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Specialist, Information Technology at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Mar 16, 2021
Significant backup time savings, user-friendly, stable, and good support
Pros and Cons
  • "The web interface is user-friendly, clean, and it provides a good summary of what you're protecting at a glance."
  • "The reporting, in particular the customization of reports, needs to be improved."

What is our primary use case?

Rubrik has been our main backup and disaster recovery solution for two campuses.

We are using the hardware appliance, rather than the virtual solution. The environments that we are protecting are 99% virtual and just a couple of physical systems.

The specific systems that we protect are SQL, Oracle, ERP, and our wireless controllers.

How has it helped my organization?

We used to have to dedicate a full-time employee just to look at and manage the backups. After implementing Rubrik, we no longer need a dedicated person. It's user-friendly to the point where anybody can just look at it and figure what's going on.

The time we spend on recovery testing has been improved by up to 50%. Similarly, we have saved time in managing our backups. The savings in time for managing our backups is up to 50%.

Using Rubrik has helped to reduce our downtime by up to 50%.

What is most valuable?

The simplicity of the SLA design is the most useful feature. You just set it and you don't need to come back to it again or worry about it.

The SLA-based policy administration has helped us to adjust the workflow, saving us time. This is because what we have right now is that we set up an SLA based on what the appliance does; for example, it might be an SQL server or an application server.

The web interface is user-friendly, clean, and it provides a good summary of what you're protecting at a glance. It also shows you whether there are jobs running, or not. It is my daily task to look at the web interface to monitor our status.

We use the archival functionality and it seems to work fine. We don't see a conflict with it.

The integration with EMC Isilon works well and it's a really great idea to have Rubrik take the snapshot not just on its end, but on the appliance end, and be able to retrieve it.

We used the predictive search functionality and find that it makes things easier to do. We save a lot of time in trying to figure out whether we need to download a file first, or whether we need to unarchive it.

What needs improvement?

The reporting, in particular the customization of reports, needs to be improved. It should be more user-friendly and a little bit easier to do. The reports should be less dull, as they are a little bit too technical for management.

When upgrading the software, the data on the node being upgraded should still be accessible from the other nodes.

Buyer's Guide
Rubrik
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about Rubrik. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been a Rubrik customer since 2017.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This product is very stable. Each time that we asked to do a backup job or a restore, it simply performs the command. We have not seen any compatibility issues.

There is no maintenance, except for security advisories that Rubrik recommends once in a while.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not seen any limitation in the amount of data that we are backing up. Between two locations, we are backing up approximately 40 terabytes.

How are customer service and support?

The support from Rubrik is excellent. They do support tunnels on the back end, and you can simply email support and they will get an answer to you within that hour. Or, if you call, then someone will address your issue right away. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we used to have Dell EMC Avamar and we were running into a problem where the backup jobs would conflict with each other. Now, Rubrik does that for us and fixes it. Not only that, but we're uploading to Azure as well. This means that we didn't have to worry about that part and how to configure it. It can be a complicated process, but the Rubrik software made it simpler to do and easy to manage.

This is one of the reasons that we switched to Rubrik.

We also have EMC Isilon, and the backup jobs were taking far too long to complete. It would take days and with Rubrik, there was a significant improvement. I would estimate a 40% cut in the time required to complete a backup.

How was the initial setup?

I find the deployment process very straightforward. It was set up in just a few hours.

The process is basically to rack and stack, then assignment management and data VLAN to the Rubrik appliance.

What about the implementation team?

Three of us were involved in the initial setup. There was me, a colleague of mine, and a Rubrik engineer. The engineer from Rubrik was very professional, insightful, and answered all of the questions that we had about the product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

As a technical person, I don't have the details, but from what I have heard, it can be expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not personally evaluate other products but my colleague, who was handling the project, evaluated Veeam and Cohesity.

What other advice do I have?

Rubrik is fully-equipped in the sense that it is a full-service backup appliance. You can search, restore, perform backups, and you can live-mount.

My advice for anybody who is considering this product is to look at what type of appliance you have and check the compatibility. Review case studies or testimonials from customers who have that appliance to get their feedback on it, and then do a demo.

What I have learned from using this product is that when the appliance does throw an error, it's not typically Rubrik's fault because they do the API calls. It's on the appliance end, so you have to keep it up to date. This is from both a firmware and software perspective.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1277985 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jan 19, 2022
Secure, simple to use , and the support is excellent
Pros and Cons
  • "Rubrik, when compared to Cohesity, Dell, and Veritas, was the best of the four."
  • "The dashboard and user interface could be improved to make them more user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

It was a test environment for testing the backups.

What is most valuable?

Rubrik is a little better than Cohesity.

Rubrik, when compared to Cohesity, Dell, and Veritas, was the best of the four.

For the most part, it is easy to use.

It is secure.

What needs improvement?

The dashboard and user interface could be improved to make them more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

Rubrik was last used six months ago.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We had some stability issues. We encountered some bugs and glitches.

I recall having to go to the lab because we couldn't get in from the outside, we had to gain access from within, and I had a network.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Rubrik is easy to scale.

We had a team of about seven users when we were working with Rubrik.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support was pretty good. They were excellent.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have also worked with Cohesity, Dell, and Veritas. Cohesity was one of the simplest. It is more user-friendly.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

The Rubrik, team assisted us with the installation and the updates.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Rubrik a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Rubrik
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about Rubrik. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1052715 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Technical Services at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jan 16, 2022
Excellent support, beneficial restorations, and simple installation
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of Rubrik are the restoration and ease of use."
  • "The solution could improve by having fewer VM Stuns."

What is our primary use case?

We use Rubrik for backup and recovery.

How has it helped my organization?

Rubrik is critical for our organization because it keeps our data safe. It helps us meet all of our POs and TOs.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Rubrik are the restoration and ease of use.

What needs improvement?

The solution could improve by having fewer VM Stuns.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Rubrik for approximately three years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have recently scaled the solution and it went well.

We have an administrator and people who do the restorations that use the solution.

How are customer service and support?

I rate Rubrik support a five out of five.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were previously using Avamar, but we switch because it was too expensive.

How was the initial setup?

The initial installation was very simple. 

I would create the ease of installation a five out of five.

What about the implementation team?

We used a VAR for the implementation and our experience was excellent.

What was our ROI?

We haven't actually calculated the ROI, but there's a good return on investment.

I would rate the ROI of Rubrik a four out of five.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We are on an annual license to use Rubrik and it is priced well.

I would rate the price of Rubrik a four out of five.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other options before, such as Cohesity. We choose Rubrik because it was overall a better solution.

What other advice do I have?

If you are wanting to implement this solution I would recommend doing your homework and evaluating other solutions.

I rate Rubrik a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1752804 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Support Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jan 7, 2022
Enables archive to cloud location and automation around the PowerShell script but doesn't cater for open source databases
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the archive to cloud location and the automation around the PowerShell script. There are also reports and dashboards."
  • "The only thing that can be improved is catering for open source databases because at the moment it doesn't cater for Mongo, MySQL, and Postgres."

What is our primary use case?

The use case is for backups of virtual environments, so it covers all IT areas. Whether it's infrastructure, virtualization or database platforms, our organization uses it for backups and storage.

The solution is deployed on-premise. The version I'm running is 5.3.1.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the archive to cloud location and the automation around the PowerShell script. There are also reports and dashboards. There is simplicity in going through the interface and servers and setting SLAs. Overall, the product is good. It's just a single pane of glass.

Rubrik has ransomware and encryption, so there is nothing I can fault on the technology.

What needs improvement?

The only thing that can be improved is catering for open source databases because at the moment it doesn't cater for Mongo, MySQL, and Postgres. It has a good database agnostic.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Rubrik for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Rubrik has come a long way. Initially, it was a bit unstable in giving incorrect information, but I think that has been rectified. The performance of the devices was an issue. When you added devices, it was a problem. Rubrik actually leverages off your Microsoft VSS, so Rubrik is basically just a front-end.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable, but you're just locked in because you have to buy a Rubrik device unless you go with the cloud.

There's another team that does maintenance. There are other products, so the team isn't just dedicated to Rubrik. We have about five individuals using Rubrik.

We are planning to increase usage. There are between a few hundred workloads to a thousand in IT. We're basically looking at cloud technology, so we're not actually using Rubrik.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is excellent.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I played with various technologies. I played with Veeam, Data Domain, Commvault, and Tivoli.

We switched to Rubrik because of the user interface. The other products use the same VSS Microsoft. The only difference between all these backup products is just the user interface, the PowerShell modules, and the reporting that it presents. 

The underlying technology is all the same, whether it is Veeam, Data Domain, whatever it is. The only thing is the compression and the deduplication. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment took a day or two.

What about the implementation team?

We worked with Rubrik for deployment.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10. 

In terms of the compression, there are other products out there that are better in terms of deduplication and recovery time. Another thing is that you have to buy a Rubrik device if you don't go cloud. You can't go buy another piece of software, so you're actually locked in.

My advice is if you want to go through Rubrik, then you must forward something that can protect the data and the backups from ransomware for end-to-end protection.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Srinivas-R - PeerSpot reviewer
General Manager - IT Infrastructure / Security at a pharma/biotech company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Nov 30, 2021
Effective Live Mount feature, reliable, and straightforward installation
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature has been the Live Mount feature."
  • "There are some features to improve on in Rubrik. For instance, they should have a tool where we can integrate with our SAP HANA. Directly from the HANA studio, we should be able to do a backup. That's what I'm looking forward to in the future."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Rubrik for our server backups.

How has it helped my organization?

The Live Mount feature is one of the main features we use. It is saving us time in restoring the VMs, allowing us to give them quickly to the developers for testing. There is a faster turnaround time.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature has been the Live Mount feature.

What needs improvement?

There are some features Rubrik planning to give in next version. For instance, a tool where we can integrate with our SAP HANA native tool directly from the HANA studio/HANA Cockpit, to trigger backup and restore. We understand it is available in the new version, looking forward to it.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Rubrik for approximately three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Rubrik is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Rubrik is scalable. We can manage multiple Rubrik appliances from a single console.

All of our IT infrastructure team are using Rubrik. We are using it in at our data centers in  India, and we have another  in the middle east. We have recently increased our usage of the solution.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good. We have good contact, all the issues are resolved on time.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have previously used a backup tool only for virtual infrastructure, as we were migrating to SAP HANA from a virtual environment. We wanted to have a single solution for virtual and physical  environments , Rubrik is helping us in a great way here.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. However, since Rubrik was new to use and different than the previous our solution, there were some new things we need to understand, such as SLA based orchestrating. We were used to scheduling it manually before, Once SLA is done the automation in place.

The full implementation process took us two and a half weeks.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation was directly from the OEM.

What was our ROI?

We have received a return on investment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We pay annually for the license for Rubrik. There are no additional costs. Initially, we needed to set it up, negotiate and finalize the offer.

What other advice do I have?

I would advise people who are wanting to implement this solution to evaluate their business case and the business requirement prior to making their decision because every enterprise has a different requirements and environments, they should do the thorough assessments, POC's  then decide on what backup fits their needs.

I rate Rubrik a nine out of ten

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Principal at a venture capital & private equity firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Nov 25, 2021
Easy to set up, supports cloud backup, and can be used as a file server
Pros and Cons
  • "What I like about Rubrik is that you can back up to the cloud. It is a different kind of backup where you're not archiving the tape. Rubrik is a physical appliance. It is a dedicated appliance to which you can back up, and you can also back up to another device. So, you can back up to Rubrik and then to another device. If you have more than one site, you can set up Rubrik on site A and also on site B. You can back up to the Rubrik on site A and then replicate that data to the Rubrik on site B."
  • "It is a lot more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."

What is most valuable?

What I like about Rubrik is that you can back up to the cloud. It is a different kind of backup where you're not archiving the tape. Rubrik is a physical appliance. It is a dedicated appliance to which you can back up, and you can also back up to another device. So, you can back up to Rubrik and then to another device. If you have more than one site, you can set up Rubrik on site A and also on site B. You can back up to the Rubrik on site A and then replicate that data to the Rubrik on site B.

I like it. There are so many functions. It can also be used as a file server. It is a physical appliance. It is a backup device, but it can also be used as a file server. It can back up a file share. 

What needs improvement?

It is a lot more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I didn't have any issues with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

You can scale it. It is expensive, and it normally requires their support team's help because it is a physical brick. So, you usually connect another brick to it, and it scales out to that brick. So, it is easy to scale out. Scalability is not a problem. 

How are customer service and support?

Since the time I've used it, I never had to call their support. I didn't have any issues with it.

How was the initial setup?

It is pretty easy to set up because it is a physical appliance. You just need to configure IP addresses. There is not much to set up on that. You just plug it into the network and assign IP addresses. After that, you just log in, and you're ready to go.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Some people say it is expensive, but you get what you pay for. If you want a Maserati, you have to pay for it. If you want to buy a Porsche, you have to pay for it.

What other advice do I have?

If you're still backing the tape, Rubrik is not going to be for you.

I would rate it a strong nine out of 10. It is a solid product.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
IT Infrastructure Engineer at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Mar 1, 2021
Provides us with reliable backups and removes the onus of checking that backups run
Pros and Cons
  • "I would rate the solution's web interface at eight out of ten. It's just fantastic and intuitive. It's so easy to use. I've never done any formal training on Rubrik, but I was able to quickly come to grips with its capabilities."
  • "We would like to be able to do granular restores directly from Exchange. Also, more granular management of VM backups would help."

What is our primary use case?

We use it as a backup for our memory store. It protects virtual and physical environments for us, all on-prem. The applications being protected include VMware VMs, Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft SQL, SharePoint, our file services, and operating systems.

How has it helped my organization?

The backups are a lot more reliable. That's the core headline. It's taken the onus off making sure that backups run and making sure that we're protected. It gives us time to work on other things proactively. It's a very reliable solution. Our technical team has benefited from it in terms of both time and capacity.

Rubrik has absolutely reduced the time we spend on recovery testing by about 75 percent. It has reduced the time we spend on managing backups by the same amount. The reduction in recovery time is even greater. It's in the Exchange and database stuff that we've really noticed the difference. It's so much easier for the guys in support to recover single files, so the reduction in recovery time is as much as 85 to 90 percent.

And because we've been able to recover more expediently, it has reduced downtime. We don't have a lot of downtime, but we know that there's a safety blanket there if we need it.

When it comes to overall productivity, the team isn't having to manage and check backups on a daily basis, so they're interfacing with our end-users or proactively checking other aspects of the infrastructure and making sure that they're running. That's what the positive effect is. Problems are being headed off before they start causing an impact. From the ITIL problem management perspective, that's fantastic.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the speedy restore. It helps in expediting RPOs and RTOs across our core applications.

I would rate the solution's web interface at eight out of ten. It's just fantastic and intuitive. It's so easy to use. I've never done any formal training on Rubrik, but I was able to quickly come to grips with its capabilities. That's a fantastic thing, especially for somebody who is just looking to adopt it, because they don't have to worry about training for their wider support function.

What needs improvement?

We would like to be able to do granular restores directly from Exchange. Also, more granular management of VM backups would help.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using Rubrik for 18 months. We've got four Briks across two data centers.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is fantastic. We rarely have to engage with Rubrik support.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is also fantastic.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used many other solutions throughout the years. This one just seemed to be quite refreshing at the time. It seemed to be the most cost-effective with the best support options.

We needed to protect our core applications and virtualized environment, which is what Rubrik did.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very straightforward. It was a solution in the box. We didn't have to complete much configuration, other than having the right port open on our destination servers and deploying the various agents. It was very easy to configure the vCenter connections and start backing up our virtualized environment.

The trickiest part was figuring out how crawler sits in there. We set up a standalone server for that and installed crawler there. I can recover an entire database and granular emails within 15 to 20 minutes, now that I've practiced.

We're having another one put in and the implementation strategy will be to upgrade the current Brik, have the new Brik upgraded to that version as well, plug it in and it will configure itself, essentially.

What about the implementation team?

We did it with our team and Rubrik support. The Rubrik team have been fantastic for the lifecycle of the product.

What was our ROI?

We have seen return on investment in Rubrik.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Veeam was also a front-runner in there, but there are a lot of horror stories about Veeam and Exchange backups. That affected the decision. Other differences between Veeam and Rubrik include the level of reliability and support as well as third-party support available from the vendor.

What other advice do I have?

Depending on the size of your environment, I would say go for it. This is a very flexible and reliable product, but I don't know how it would do in a large, enterprise-size infrastructure. I can't comment on that because I've never tested it.

The SLA-based policy automation is just another name for protection group. It hasn't really changed the game. It's just a logical way of grouping the things that you protect and making sure they're all backed up in a similar way. It's good.

I've tried some of the API from Rubrik, to automate the SQL resource, but it took a bit of a backseat. I've toyed with it a little bit, but not to the full extent of its capabilities. So far, the APIs seem fit for purpose. We have also looked into the Polaris SaaS-based framework for extracting metadata, from a risk perspective, but we haven't used it.

There are just 40 of us in IT and about 30 of us have got access to it. I don't think many of them interface with it on a daily basis. The only regular user is probably just one of the infrastructure guys. We use it as a backbone for protecting the data of 900-plus law firm employees.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate this product at eleven. It is really good. We are a happy customer.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Service Delivery Consultant at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Feb 7, 2021
We can retrieve data faster, trimming down our recovery time
Pros and Cons
  • "In terms of usage, Rubrik has allowed us to retrieve data 80 to 90 percent faster than our previous technology."
  • "The reporting in the dashboard and reporting for extractions both need improvement. I would suggest making them easier to understand and use, not just out-of-the-box. We should also be able to customize them."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use cases of Rubrik are to back up critical files, servers, documents, VMs, and partition drives from servers. We protect our Linux and Unix OSs.

I am using both their physical appliances and software. We are using it on SaaS.

How has it helped my organization?

The SLA-based policy automation affects us greatly because we don't need to monitor it daily. We just allow the SLA to screen and do a daily checkup, e.g., if the SLA proceeded and or if it failed. This makes our work much easier. 

We use the archival functionality in terms of our cloud operations. Instead of buying extra hardware or extra large devices for Rubrik, we attached it and transferred our on-premise data to the cloud. We had a seamless connection from the AWS platform.

What is most valuable?

Lately, we appreciate the archival to cloud and search finder for restorations, where we don't need to back up or restore the overall backup of a drive. Instead, we just retrieve specific files from specific servers.

Rubrik's web interface is user-friendly. It takes time to understand every aspect of the system and interface, but it is understandable and quite easy to use.

It is seamless with fast backup storage.

What needs improvement?

The reporting in the dashboard and reporting for extractions both need improvement. I would suggest making them easier to understand and use, not just out-of-the-box. We should also be able to customize them.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Rubrik for around two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have had some minor issues, but they have been solved. In terms of backup, it has been quite good and works as expected.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability as a three out of five because additional hardware is a must if in terms of infrastructure loads. In terms of archival functionality, the scalability is good because you can achieve that through cloud storage.

We have four Rubrik clusters with 41 DB in them. I would assume that we are backing up around 100 terabytes of data from the company.

We have three system administrators who handle the infrastructure side of the company.

How are customer service and technical support?

In terms of escalating tickets or bugs, they are very quick in terms of their support system.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used a different solution called Legato, which is an old school tape backup solution. We switched to Rubrik because of:

  1. Costs.
  2. Time.
  3. Hardware updates and outdated technology.

Compared to the way that we were previously backing up different files and servers, using Rubrik is as easy as clicking a button, except using dates.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

Rubrik's partner (Trend Micro) usually does the heavy work on it. It only takes around three to four hours to set up, depending on the company's infrastructure and security. We had a very good experience during the deployment process.

What was our ROI?

We were able to decrease the process around five minutes using Rubrik from a day's work.

It trims down recovery testing time from eight hours to 10 to 15 minutes.

In terms of usage, Rubrik has allowed us to retrieve data 80 to 90 percent faster than our previous technology.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We reviewed Commvault, Rubrik, and Dell EMC. Rubrik won out in stability, support, and functionality.

What other advice do I have?

Know your needs first and understand if Rubrik can provide the solution to your problems. In terms of backup, Rubrik is a top-notch technology. In terms of user-friendliness, UI, and the price, it is suitable for a company or startup to consider this solution.

Time matters in terms of receiving and backing up data. Having a solution that can fit in terms of time management can help a company thrive.

We don't actually backup cloud systems. We only do archival. We upload the on-premise data to the cloud.

I would rate Rubrik as a 10 (out of 10).

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Rubrik Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Rubrik Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.