Trello Reviews

My primary use case for Trello is project and task management for academic research. I use it to organize research activities, track deadlines, manage project milestones, design tasks with team projects, and monitor progress across different stages of research. It also helps keep all project-related information in one place and improves collaboration among team members.

In one of our research projects, we used Trello to manage a semester-long study on student learning behavior. We created separate boards for each phase of the project: literature review, data collection, analysis, and reporting. Each task, such as designing survey questions or cleaning a dataset, was added as a card with deadlines and assigned owners. This helped us clearly track progress, avoid duplicated work, and quickly see what was pending or completed. It also made weekly team check-ins more structured since we could review the board instead of relying on scattered updates.

Trello helps significantly with prioritization, keeping research work structured over time. We often use labels and lists to separate urgent tasks, ongoing work, and completed items, which makes it easier to focus on what actually needs attention each week. It also works well for long-term academic projects because we can revisit past tasks, track progress history, and maintain continuity even when team members change or new contributors join.

The best features of Trello are its Kanban-style boards, drag-and-drop task management, labels, due dates, and team collaboration. I also find the simplicity of the interface to be a significant advantage. It does not take much time to learn, which is especially helpful for student and research work.

Kanban boards help us break down academic research into clear stages such as planning, data collection, analysis, and reporting. This makes it easy to visually track where each task is in the workflow, so we always know what is in progress, what is done, and what still needs attention. Labels add another layer of organization by helping us categorize tasks, for example, urgent items, literature review tasks, or data-related work. This is especially useful when multiple people are working on the same project. Overall, these features make research work more structured, transparent, and easy to coordinate with the team.

Using Trello positively impacted our projects by improving organization, visibility, and overall team efficiency. It helped us break down research work into clear tasks, track progress more effectively, and ensure that nothing was missed during different project phases. This made it much easier to coordinate within the team and meet deadlines consistently. If I had to quantify it, I would say it improved our workflow efficiency by around twenty to thirty percent, mainly because it reduced confusion, duplicate work, and time spent on status updates during meetings.

There are several areas where Trello could be improved based on our academic research and team project usage. One improvement would be more advanced built-in analytics, such as better progress tracking dashboards or productivity insights without relying on third-party tools. Another area is scalability for complex projects where boards get very large with many cards and dependencies. It can become harder to manage without additional structure or hierarchy features. Overall, it works very well, but these enhancements would make it even stronger for larger or long-term projects.

One additional area of improvement in Trello is automation and integrations. While Trello does support basic automation through Butler, more advanced and flexible automation rules would be helpful, especially for academic research workflows where tasks often move between stages in more complex forms. It would help if automation rules were easier to set up and more flexible for different project workflows. Additionally, smoother integrations with tools such as Google Drive or other study applications would save time and reduce switching between platforms.

I think one additional improvement for Trello would be support for larger projects with many tasks and team members. As boards grow, they can become crowded and harder to navigate. More advanced filtering, reporting, and project overview features would help users manage complex projects more efficiently.

I have been using Trello for the past two years.

The twenty to thirty percent improvement estimate with Trello is based on comparing how we worked before and after adopting it in our academic research projects. Before Trello, we relied on group chats, spreadsheets, and email updates, which meant a lot of time was spent clarifying task status, following up, and reorganizing work manually. After switching, we tracked how much time was spent in weekly check-ins and task coordination. The efficiency gain is not from a formal measurement tool but from observed reductions in coordination time, fewer delays, and smoother task tracking across semester-long projects.

My advice for anyone considering Trello is to start with a simple board structure and avoid overcomplicating it. Use clear lists, labels, and due dates from the beginning so tasks stay organized as the project grows. Trello works especially well for students, research teams, and small to medium-sized projects because it is easy to learn and quick to adopt. I also recommend exploring the built-in automation and integrations, as they save time and improve team productivity without requiring much setup. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.

My main use case for Trello is graphics, specifically for interacting with a graphics designer.

A quick, specific example of how I use Trello with my graphics designer is that I put requests in for them and I manage those requests as well as from other people who need to use the graphics designer.

Trello has impacted my organization positively as it keeps things better organized.

The best feature Trello offers is that it keeps things better organized, so it makes things easier to collaborate with people.

I can say that I really enjoyed using Trello for a lot of things, and it has some really good features, such as helping people write out descriptions and the comment section being absolutely one of the best parts of it.

It is hard to track completed requests and show performance based on closed cards.

I have been using Trello for six to seven years.

The customer support for Trello in my experience is not great, as I tried to reach out to get answers before or even look on the web community support for things, such as the out-of-office notifications, without finding answers.

Neutral

I previously used Monday.com at another company.

I don't really think Trello is good for automation, or that it has good automation features; in general, it's a pretty standard project management board.

My advice to others looking into using Trello is that with any project management software, you just need to know if it meets your needs and do a POC, while also recognizing that Trello is similar to Monday.

On a scale of one to ten, I rate Trello an eight out of ten.

I mostly do software development. I am building a SaaS platform for business process automation, so I mostly work with software now. That is why Trello is mentioned. I am not working much with network infrastructure anymore at this time. If I do work with network infrastructure, it will be occasionally with Juniper Networks, but not Cisco. Trello is the only software product that I work with now. What I do now does not involve digital infrastructure anymore. It is mostly software.

I have found the boards in Trello to be quite valuable for providing updates from the project manager to the dev team. I found that to be most valuable in managing a sprint.

Because we upgraded from the free version to the $6 per month version, and because most of our projects at this time are not huge, we have found that to be very sufficient. Trello is one software that we use quite often. Even though I am not a developer anymore, I am leading the organization and I focus a lot more on sales and management. Trello is still one software that we use a lot.

In terms of notifications, in terms of managing our sprints, in terms of managing our tasks, Trello is most valuable for task management. It helps with managing time and expectations. It also eases communication. Trello has been pretty much everything we need for our software development.

Trello's Kanban interface is awesome. For us, it actually addresses all of our needs in that regard.

Maybe some AI enhancements would be beneficial, but in terms of how we use Trello here, a lot of people seem to be really happy with Trello and that is always the go-to. Most people will just immediately tell you to go to Trello and get their latest products. I think Trello has done a fantastic job regarding that.

I have been using Trello overall for about six years.

We worked with the paid version. We had that subscription, and the last time we had it was for maybe about a year or so. That subscription only ended a couple of months ago. We used the paid version, which was $6 a month. We had about five or six licenses.

I purchased directly from the Trello website. I did not use any other method. I am not sure Trello has resellers. I think they may have partners where you can buy Trello from, perhaps Amazon or a couple of places, but I doubt if Trello has partners or maybe I do not even know if they actually really need to have partners.

I have not had any reason to interact with their technical support, so I would not know. I think it is quite responsive. I have not really interacted with customer support much. The only interaction we had was some messages regarding subscriptions and managing subscriptions.

I have not used Trello's mobile app for project management. Maybe my colleagues have, but personally I have not.

I think Trello is quite popular in Nigeria. Trello and Jira, Confluence, especially Trello and Jira, are the most popular project management software in Nigeria currently. I think Trello is doing a good job with marketing, but most people actually use Trello.

We have a Trello account for my company Infohob, which is currently inactive in terms of paid subscriptions, but the account is still active.

I know that there have been some improvements. I have seen some articles published on LinkedIn regarding Trello, but I have not used it recently myself. It is used mostly by the team, even though I also had a subscription or a license. I was not as active as my teammates. From what I see, I think it actually pretty much exceeded our expectations or at least met all of our expectations regarding task management and sprint management. I think it was excellent. At the level at which we use Trello, I think we are just fine.

I find the pricing reasonable.

Trello is the most popular option in the market. I actually find it hard to think of any other products in the market. You may have other products which would be mostly for companies using ERPs, maybe depending on the size of the company. If it is a small company, then it would be Zoho or Odoo. If it is a big company, probably SAP or Oracle. But generally, Trello is clearly the most popular product in Nigeria.

We use Trello for a number of different things. We use it in R&D, in product, and across the company for tracking ideas and monitoring tasks.

The ability to move cards between boards is really helpful, as well as the labels. The ability to tag different team members in both the description and the comments, and the due dates feature are handy. We are able to customize the labels, both the text and the color, so when looking at a board, we can easily filter or see cards related to specific tasks or team members. This functionality really streamlines using Trello. Trello definitely saves time and makes things a lot easier, except when it's buggy.

There can be bugs sometimes. When more than one person tries to edit the description at the same time, it can do some unexpected things. I would like to see that improved. Sometimes they add new features, which can be either welcome or odd. More control over email notifications would also be helpful.

I have been using Trello for probably ten or eleven years now.

The scalability is fine for our organization.

We used something very outdated in comparison to Trello. I don't remember what it was called, maybe something like Bug Tracker, but I'm really not sure.

It was so long ago I don't remember, but I think it was fairly straightforward. I think we also migrated some tasks or tickets from a previous solution.

It saves us time. Sometimes we can have a back-and-forth conversation in the comments, which helps minimize some meetings.

I recommend testing it out. Trello has a free version, which is a really easy way to get started. It's simple to use, easy to add team members or even external consultants. I would rate Trello an eight overall. Trello is good for what we need. It is not too complex, but it has a decent amount of features that we take advantage of. Every solution has room for improvement, which is why I didn't give it a nine or ten.

My main use case for Trello is to organize our job and for project management, and it helps us to organize tickets, set priorities, and build a feature list schedule for our team.

We use checklists to organize priorities and organize job to do one by one, step-by-step, so it really helps us to build it.

The best features Trello offers in my opinion are probably its good design, and the ability to easily manage many boards and separate jobs between work among those tables.

Trello has positively impacted my organization as it saves us about one hour a week, and it's really good to have a product such as Trello just to organize it.

Having special fields for users such as members, testers, and verifiers would be beneficial, as it would be much easier for us than adding three people in a row as members.

I have been using Trello for five years.

Trello is stable for my needs.

I have not seen any issues with Trello's scalability since we joined it.

We have not experienced any huge problems, so I never contacted technical support.

I would rate the customer support an eight based on my experience.

Positive

We used Jira before Trello, but it was much more complicated, and we switched to a much simpler product such as Trello.

It was just a single option to switch to Trello.

I do not know if we have seen a return on investment from using Trello.

I do not have information on pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trello because it was set up by my manager and staff.

My advice to others looking into using Trello is that if you have a small team and need to organize small projects into one system, it's a good product to use instead of Jira.

I would rate Trello a nine on a scale of 1 to 10.

I chose nine out of 10 because I would to see more features in the next releases, and probably it will rise to that.

We use Trello to manage projects and different tasks with various teams to manage our workflows. Some examples include getting content created. We put a card onto Trello with a content request, and then it gets moved along the queue as different people do what they need to do. It's also a way to prioritize different items by having different columns for tasks that need to get done. We can organize them by time or status. Trello is very customizable.

Just being able to manage tasks very easily is one of the best features Trello offers. We can attach whatever we need there and tag multiple people. It's a very easy way to get multiple teams working on the same project and know who's responsible. It replaces ping-ponging emails back and forth with a board where people can follow a task from start to finish and see when it's done. This allows projects to be completed without confusion and makes it easy to track different pieces using the checklists.

Trello could be improved by having a better notification system. Currently, notifications flood my inbox, making it hard to differentiate what I actually need to open. Each card move or addition results in a new email, so a digest or a better way to receive notifications would be helpful. It would also be beneficial to more easily assign different members to specific parts of cards or action items.

I have been using Trello for about five years.

No, I did not use a different solution before Trello.

I am not responsible for the budget and wouldn't know about actual ROI metrics, but anecdotally, Trello saves a lot of time, effort, and prevents miscommunication.

My main use case for Trello is task management, for organizing all the projects, different boards for different departments, things like that.

I set up my boards using a lot of custom labels and I integrate with other tools, but sometimes it can be very pricey to do that.

I really like Trello's drag and drop; sometimes the board can get overwhelming, though, with so many cards everywhere. But there are good filtration options. There doesn't seem to be a good way to organize a parent project, such as an epic card, and then have sub-cards. That seems to be lacking.

Trello has impacted my organization positively by keeping everything very organized and allowing people to keep track of their tasks.

I would like to see Trello improved with more options for integration with other platforms, a way to manage an overall project with all the specifications, and then managing all the sub-cards related to that project.

I have been using Trello for a long time, since they started.

I don't really have anything else to add about my main use case or how I organize things in Trello.

Regarding the best features Trello offers in my opinion, that's all I would like to add.

That pretty much covers my thoughts on the needed improvements.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Trello a 9.

I have a free account on Trello. There are two many tools that I have used in the past. I had used Trello for some time in the past, but since my needs were too simple, I stopped using it.

The most valuable features of the solution revolve around the mobile version of the product that was easy to use.

I used only the tool's free version. I didn't use the solution extensively for several months, as it was more of trying out what Trello is capable of because it was something I kept hearing about my colleagues and from my wide circle of friends who were using it. Honestly, I didn't spend a lot of time with the tool.

I have been using Trello for my personal needs, but not to an extensive range.

In terms of stability, Trello is different from ADO because multiple people use the latter. Trello was available as a standalone version that does not allow you to collaborate with other people. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten. I didn't explore it for its capabilities. I don't know how other features in the tool behave. I don't know much about the product since I used it for my personal use.

I understand that the tool is deployed through apps, and it has the technology all the way, owing to which it should be scalable to whatever number of users are needed.

I was the only user of the product.

I have used Jira in the past. I have also used another product named Redmine, but it was used around 10 to 15 years ago when my company was first introduced to the concept of agile.

Trello is at par with Jira and Redmine.

There wasn't much time required to deploy the product since it offers an immediate installation process.

Trello helps organize cluttered items into buckets. If you are looking for something that helps sort out, organize, and plan activities, then the tool definitely provides some value.

I do believe that Trello has a licensed version, but I used the free version of the tool with limited capabilities. Trello offers a SaaS model. I didn't do a thorough investigation to compare Trello's prices to other tools.

The product has features to support project management workflows and team collaborations. I was using a free version for my personal use and for managing my private activities, and both times, I saw that the tool did the job.

I used Trello's board and card system of training with Kanban task management format to handle work in progress and to see whether it has already been completed. I would say that the tool was decent in the aforementioned area.

I used the product's mobile version and the handheld device version, and I can say that it was easy to use. In general, the tool's app was quite easy to use.

It is definitely a product which is quite highly rated by others.

The mobile application functionality affected my productivity in a good way. It is quite good because, if I remember correctly, I could set some reminders for pending tasks. The tool did improve my productivity. The tool did help me deal with my personal backlog and to-do activities.

As a beginner-level user, I found the tool very helpful and intuitive. From my friends, I came to know that it is an application that can be used in a wide enterprise setup. If you have an option, you can try it.

I rate the overall tool a nine to ten out of ten.

It's essentially a virtual board that allows you to easily plan various tasks, projects, and events.

I find its simplicity quite valuable, particularly its versatile use for organizing tasks, planning events, or even managing personal projects like writing. While I haven't explored all its features, I appreciate the ease of creating boards and the flexibility it offers.

In terms of improvements, adding more artificial intelligence and making it more user-friendly in terms of design could be beneficial. However, given its user-friendly nature, there's not much to criticize.

I've used Trello in a private capacity, mainly for personal organization or small team planning for the past few months.

Its scalability suits small to medium business needs. It's not for large enterprises or massive projects.

As for support, I haven't directly interacted with it, so I can't judge the assistance provided.

I had previously used Jira but found Trello to be more flexible and user-friendly. While I've not evaluated other options, I would recommend it for both personal and team-oriented tasks or projects, given its ease of use and adaptability.

Trello's initial setup is almost effortless, much like registering for an email account.

It is free.

Regarding features, it could benefit from better integration with other platforms, though it's not a critical need for me. Customization-wise, it's quite configurable, and it's not too demanding in terms of usage or customization. Overall, I'd rate it an eight. To improve it further, enabling a more significant scale for larger teams or enterprise-level use could be beneficial, but given its design and structure, this might be challenging to implement.